Peer review process
Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, and public reviews.
Read more about eLife’s peer review process.Editors
- Reviewing EditorVolker DötschGoethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Senior EditorVolker DötschGoethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
This foundational study builds on prior work from this group to reveal the complexities underlying ligand-dependent RXRγ-Nur77 heterodimer formation, offering a compelling re-evaluation of their earlier conclusions. The authors examine how a library of RXR ligands influences the biophysical, structural, and functional properties of Nur77. They find that although the Nur77-RXRγ heterodimer shares notable functional similarities with the Nurr1-RXRα complex, it also exhibits unique features, notably, both dimer dissociation and classical agonist-driven activities. This work advances our understanding of the nuanced behaviors of nuclear receptor heterodimers, which have important implications for health and disease.
Strengths:
(1) Builds on previous work by providing a comprehensive analysis that examines whether Nur77-RXRγ heterodimer formation parallels that of the Nurr1-RXRα complex.
(2) Systematic evaluation of a library of RXR ligands provides a broad survey of functional outputs.
(3) Careful reanalysis of previous work sheds new light on how NR4A heterodimers function.
Weaknesses:
(1) Some conclusions appear overstated or are not well substantiated by the work presented. It's unclear how the data support a non-classical mode of agonism, for example, based on the data shown.
(2) Some assays have relatively few replicates, with only two in some cases.
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
This foundational study builds on prior work from this group to reveal the complexities underlying ligand-dependent RXRγ-Nur77 heterodimer formation, offering a compelling re-evaluation of their earlier conclusions. The authors examine how a library of RXR ligands influences the biophysical, structural, and functional properties of Nur77. They find that although the Nur77-RXRγ heterodimer shares notable functional similarities with the Nurr1-RXRα complex, it also exhibits unique features, notably, both dimer dissociation and classical agonist-driven activities. This work advances our understanding of the nuanced behaviors of nuclear receptor heterodimers, which have important implications for health and disease.
Strengths:
(1) Builds on previous work by providing a comprehensive analysis that examines whether Nur77-RXRγ heterodimer formation parallels that of the Nurr1-RXRα complex.
(2) Systematic evaluation of a library of RXR ligands provides a broad survey of functional outputs.
(3) Careful reanalysis of previous work sheds new light on how NR4A heterodimers function.
Weaknesses:
(1) Some conclusions appear overstated or are not well substantiated by the work presented. It's unclear how the data support a non-classical mode of agonism, for example, based on the data shown.
(2) Some assays have relatively few replicates, with only two in some cases.