Figures and data

KIN-G is a substrate of TbPLK in T. brucei.
(A). Co-immunostaining of KIN-G-3HA and TbPLK during the cell cycle in the procyclic form. Open arrowheads indicate KIN-G signal at the centrin arm. TbPLK signal at different structures are indicated. BB: basal body; CA: centrin arm; FC: flagella connector; FAZt: FAZ tip. Scale bars: 5 μm. (B). TbPLK phosphorylates KIN-G in vitro. The asterisk indicates a non-specific band. (C). In vitro phosphorylated KIN-G migrates slower than non-phosphorylated KIN-G on SDS-PAGE. (D). In vitro TbPLK phosphosites on KIN-G protein identified by mass spectrometry. Phosphosites highlighted in red indicate the in vitro and in vivo phosphosites. MD: motor domain; CC: coiled coil; MB: microtubule-binding motif; NB: nucleotide-binding motif. (E). Phosphosites within the KIN-G protein sequence spanning MB1 to MB3. Sequences highlighted in blue indicate the microtubule-binding motifs (MB1, MB2 and MB3), and sequences highlighted in green indicate the nucleotide-binding motifs (NB2 and NB3). Phosphosites highlighted in red in the yellow box indicate the in vitro and in vivo phosphosites.

Phosphorylation of KIN-G by TbPLK disrupts the microtubule-binding activity of KIN-G.
(A). Pre-incubation of KIN-G with TbPLK, but not TbPLKK70R, disrupted KIN-G microtubule-binding activity. KIN-G, KIN-G and TbPLK mixture, and KIN-G and TbPLKK70R mixture were first attached to coverslips and then microtubules (MTs) were added into the chamber. (B). Quantitation of KIN-G-bound microtubules in the presence or absence of TbPLK or in the presence of TbPLKK70R. Error bars indicate S.D. from three independent experiments. ****: p<0.0001; ns: no significance (one-way ANOVA). (C). Measurement of the microtubule-gliding speed of KIN-G in the presence or absence of TbPLK or in the presence of TbPLKK70R. Error bars indicate S.D. from three independent experiments. ND: not done. ns: no significance (one-way ANOVA). (D). TbPLK disrupted KIN-G microtubule-binding activity. KIN-G was first attached to coverslips, MTs were added into the chamber, and finally TbPLK was added into the chamber. (E). Quantitation of KIN-G-bound microtubules following the incubation with or without TbPLK. Error bars indicate S.D. from three independent experiments. **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001 (Student’s t-test).

Phosphorylation of Thr301 on KIN-G by TbPLK disrupts the microtubule-binding activity of KIN-G.
(A). Microtubule-binding activity of KIN-G and its Thr284 and Thr301 mutants. (B). Quantitation of the bound microtubules of KIN-G and its mutants. Error bars indicate S.D. from three independent experiments. **: p<0.01; ns: no significance (one-way ANOVA). (C). Measurement of the microtubule-gliding speed of KIN-G and its mutants. Error bars indicate S.D. from three independent experiments. ND: not done. ns: no significance (one-way ANOVA).

Expression of Thr301 phospho-mimic mutant of KIN-G disrupts cell proliferation.
(A). Subcellular localization of ectopically expressed KIN-G, KIN-GT301A, KIN-GT301D, co-stained with TbCentrin4. BB: basal body; CA: centrin arm. Scale bar: 5 μm. (B). Western blotting to detect the levels of ectopically 3HA-tagged KIN-G and its mutants and the endogenously PTP-tagged KIN-G before and after tetracycline induction for 48 hours. TbPSA6 serves as a loading control. (C). Growth curves of KIN-G RNAi cell line and its complementation cell lines expressing KIN-G, KIN-GT301A, or KIN-GT301D. OE: overexpression. Error bars indicate S.D. from three independent experiments. (D). Quantitation of the numbers of nuclei (N) and kinetoplasts (K) of KIN-G RNAi cell line and its complementation cell lines. Error bars indicated S.D. from three independent experiments.

TbPLK phosphorylation of Thr301 on KIN-G disrupts centrin arm and Golgi biogenesis.
(A). Effect of the expression of KIN-GT301D on centrin arm formation. Cells were co-immunostained with the pancentrin antibody 20H5 and the anti-TbCentrin4 antibody. Scale bar: 5 μm. (B). Measurement of centrin arm length in KIN-G RNAi cells expressing Thr301 phospho-mimic of KIN-G before and after tetracycline induction. Error bars indicate S.D. ns: no significance; ****: p<0.0001 (Student’s t-test). (C). Effect of the expression of KIN-GT301D on the biogenesis of Golgi and ER exit site (ERES). Cells were co-immunostained with the anti-TbGRASP antibody to detect TbGRASP. ERES was labeled by mCherry-tagged Sec13. Scale bar: 5 μm. (D). Quantitation of cells with different numbers of Golgi/ERES in control and KIN-G RNAi cells. Error bars indicate S.D. from three independent experiments. ***: p<0.001; ****: p<0.0001 (one-way ANOVA).

TbPLK phosphorylation of Thr301 on KIN-G impairs flagellar inheritance.
(A). Effect of the expression of KIN-GT301D on the elongation of the flagellum attachment zone (FAZ) filament. Cells were immunostained with the anti-CC2D antibody. Scale bar: 5 μm. (B). Measurement of the length of the new and the old FAZ filaments in control and KIN-G RNAi cells expressing KIN-GT301D. Error bars indicate S.D. **: p<0.01; ****: p<0.0001 (one-way ANAVA). (C). Measurement of the cell body length of the new-flagellum daughter (NFD) cell and its correlation with the length of the new FAZ for control cells and KIN-G RNAi cells expressing KIN-GT301D. (D). Effect of the expression of KIN-GT301D on the segregation of flagellar pocket collar (FPC) and basal body (BB). Cells were co-immunostained with anti-TbBILBO1 antibody and YL1/2 antibody. Scale bar: 5 μm. (E, F). Measurement of the inter-FPC distance (E) and inter-BB distance (F) in control cells and KIN-G RNAi cells expressing Thr301 phospho-mimic mutant of KIN-G. Error bars indicate S.D. ****: p<0.0001 (one-way ANOVA).

Phosphorylation of KIN-G at Thr301 by TbPLK disrupts cell division plane placement.
(A). Immunofluorescence microscopy to detect the cell division plane with endogenous triple HA-tagged KLIF in dividing cells from non-induced control and KIN-G RNAi cells. Yellow arrows indicate the KLIF-marked cell division plane. NFD: new-flagellum daughter; OFD: old-flagellum daughter. Scale bar: 5 μm. (B). Immunofluorescence microscopy to detect the NFD posterior and the OFD nascent posterior with PTP-tagged GB4 protein. Scale bar: 5 μm. (C). Measurement of the inter-posterior distance of bi-nucleated cells from non-induced control and KIN-G RNAi cells. Error bars indicate S.D. ***, p<0.001 (Student’s t-test). (D). Non-induced and tetracycline-induced KIN-G RNAi cells expressing KIN-GT301D. Shown are a non-dividing cell without a visible cleavage furrow and three dividing cells with a visible cleavage furrow. Yellow arrows indicate the cell division plane. Scale bar: 5 μm. (E). Quantitation of bi-nucleated cells with or without a visible cleavage furrow from non-induced and tetracycline-induced KIN-G RNAi cells expressing KIN-GT301D. Error bars indicate S.D. from three independent experiments. ****, p<0.0001 (one-way ANOVA). (F). Percentage of dividing bi-nucleated cells with a normally placed cell division plane or an abnormally placed cell division plane from non-induced and tetracycline-induced KIN-G RNAi cells expressing KIN-GT301D.