Developmental stage determines the realized energy landscape for a flight specialist

  1. Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany
  2. Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany
  3. Section Géographie, École normale supérieure de Lyon, BP 7000 69342 Lyon Cedex 07, France
  4. ERSAF-Direzione Parco Nazionale dello Stelvio, 23100 Bormio (SO), Italy
  5. Swiss Ornithological Institute, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland
  6. Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zürich, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
  7. Konrad Lorenz Research Center (KLF), Core Facility for Behavior and Cognition, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 4645 Grünau/Almtal, Austria

Peer review process

Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, and public reviews.

Read more about eLife’s peer review process.

Editors

  • Reviewing Editor
    Yuuki Watanabe
    Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Tokyo, Japan
  • Senior Editor
    George Perry
    Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States of America

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Summary:

The authors propose that the energy landscape of animals can be thought of in the same way as the fundamental versus realized niche concept in ecology. Namely, animals will use a subset of the fundamental energy landscape due to a variety of factors. The authors then show that the realized energy landscape of eagles increases with age as the animals are better able to use the energy landscape.

Strengths:

This is a very interesting idea and that adds significantly to the energy landscape framework. They provide convincing evidence that the available regions used by birds increase with size.

Weaknesses:

Some of the measures used in the manuscript are difficult to follow and there is no mention of the morphometrics of birds or how these change with age (other than that they don't change which seems odd as surely they grow). Also, there may need to be more discussion of other ontogenetic changes such as foraging strategies, home range size etc.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Summary:

With this work, the authors tried to expand and integrate the concept of realized niche in the context of movement ecology by using fine-scale GPS data of 55 juvenile Golden eagles in the Alps. Authors found that ontogenic changes influence the percentage of area flyable to the eagles as individuals exploit better geographic uplifts that allow them to reduce the cost of transport.

Strengths:

Authors made insightful work linking changes in ontogeny and energy landscapes in large soaring birds. It may not only advance the understanding of how changes in the life cycle affect the exploitability of aerial space but also offer valuable tools for the management and conservation of large soaring species in the changing world.

Weaknesses:

Future research may test the applicability of the present work by including more individuals and/or other species from other study areas.

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation