54 results found
  1. PREreview — a new resource for the collaborative review of preprints

    Reviewing preprints provides feedback to the authors and helps involve more scientists in peer review.
  2. Accelerating science with preprints

    eLife encourages authors to deposit manuscripts as preprints in bioRxiv and other online repositories in order to increase access to research findings and to communicate new results more quickly.
  3. Preprint progress

    A summary of our recent application in response to the ASAPbio Request for Applications for central services to support the use of preprints in the biological sciences.
  4. Authors can now submit a preprint to bioRxiv while submitting to eLife

    By offering the opportunity to submit to bioRxiv at submission, it saves Authors time and supports the use of preprints.
  5. Webinar report: What’s the deal with preprints?

    The first of our monthly #ECRWednesday webinars explored the advantages of preprints.
  6. Scientific Publishing: Beyond scoops to best practices

    Eve Marder
    Authors submitting a manuscript to eLife are encouraged to upload it to a recognized preprint server at the same time in order to make their results available as quickly and as widely as possible.
    Editorial
    Available as:
    • HTML
    • PDF
  7. Opinion: Including preprints and interim research products in applications and reports

    Our response to the National Institutes of Health Request for Information on the use of interim research products in NIH applications and reports, and the standards for reporting them.
  8. Point of View: Priority of discovery in the life sciences

    Ronald D Vale, Anthony A Hyman
    Disclosing work prior to submission to a journal would benefit scientists seeking to be acknowledged for their discoveries.
  9. Research: Publication bias and the canonization of false facts

    Silas Boye Nissen et al.
    Publication bias, in which positive results are preferentially reported by authors and published by journals, can restrict the visibility of evidence against false claims and allow such claims to be canonized inappropriately as facts.
  10. Peer Review: Decisions, decisions

    Peter Rodgers
    Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparency and respond to author preferences.

Refine your results by:

Type
Research categories