Skip to Content
eLife home page
Submit my research
(via ORCID - An ORCID is a persistent digital identifier for researchers)
Browse the search results
Page 2 of 20
Scientific Publishing: Beyond scoops to best practices
Authors submitting a manuscript to eLife are encouraged to upload it to a recognized preprint server at the same time in order to make their results available as quickly and as widely as possible.
Opinion: Including preprints and interim research products in applications and reports
Our response to the National Institutes of Health Request for Information on the use of interim research products in NIH applications and reports, and the standards for reporting them.
Point of View: Priority of discovery in the life sciences
Ronald D Vale, Anthony A Hyman
Disclosing work prior to submission to a journal would benefit scientists seeking to be acknowledged for their discoveries.
JetFighter: Towards figure accuracy and accessibility
JetFighter screens preprints to improve data representation and colour-blind accessibility.
Scientific Publishing: How early-career researchers are shaping eLife
Mark Patterson, Randy Schekman
Journals can benefit from listening to graduate students, postdocs and newly-independent group leaders.
Computational and Systems Biology
Point of View: Data science for the scientific life cycle
Daphne Ezer, Kirstie Whitaker
Each stage of the scientific life cycle stands to benefit from the introduction of data science techniques.
Research: Publication bias and the canonization of false facts
Silas Boye Nissen et al.
Publication bias, in which positive results are preferentially reported by authors and published by journals, can restrict the visibility of evidence against false claims and allow such claims to be canonized inappropriately as facts.
Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Research Culture: Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts
Gary S McDowell et al.
Early career researchers commonly peer review manuscripts on behalf of invited reviewers, often without receiving feedback or being named to the journal.
Research: Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature
Daniel S Himmelstein et al.
The availability of almost all articles from toll access journals in the Sci-Hub repository will disrupt scholarly publishing towards more open models.
Peer Review: Decisions, decisions
Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparency and respond to author preferences.
Be the first to read new articles from eLife
Sign up for alerts
Please leave this field empty
Back to top