Skip to Content
eLife home page
Submit my research
(via ORCID - An ORCID is a persistent digital identifier for researchers)
Browse the search results
Page 2 of 305
Multicellularity: The evolution of gene regulation
Veronica Hinman, Gregory Cary
The gene regulation mechanisms necessary for the development of complex multicellular animals have been found in sponges.
The Natural History of Model Organisms: An organismal perspective on
development, origins and diversification
Matthew J Kourakis, William C Smith
The life cycle and morphology of the sea squirt
shed light on vertebrate evolution.
and early career researchers
Randy Schekman et al.
There are many reasons for submitting your best work to eLife, especially if you are an early career researcher.
Meta-Research: Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions
Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang et al.
A longitudinal study of open access levels at 1,207 research institutions worldwide reveals high performing institutions in Latin America, Africa and Asia.
Chromosomes and Gene Expression
Ophthalmology: Stem cells set their sights on retinitis pigmentosa
Jeannette L Bennicelli, Jean Bennett
Research Culture: Setting the right tone
Tanita Casci, Elizabeth Adams
Improving the research culture of an institution may lead to a fairer, more rewarding and successful environment, but how do you start making changes?
Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Research: A comprehensive and quantitative exploration of thousands of viral genomes
Gita Mahmoudabadi, Rob Phillips
A compendium of critical genomic numbers for viruses through the lenses of different viral classification systems.
Research: Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature
Daniel S Himmelstein et al.
The availability of almost all articles from toll access journals in the Sci-Hub repository will disrupt scholarly publishing towards more open models.
Epidemiology and Global Health
Science Forum: Unit of analysis issues in laboratory-based research
Nick R Parsons et al.
A simulation study is used to demonstrate how mistakes in identifying the experimental unit and the unit of analysis can lead to incorrect analyses and inappropriate inferences when reporting research studies.
Research: Gender bias in scholarly peer review
Markus Helmer et al.
Gender-bias in peer reviewing might persist even when gender-equity is reached because both male and female editors operate with a same-gender preference whose characteristics differ by editor-gender.
Be the first to read new articles from eLife
Sign up for alerts
Please leave this field empty
Back to top