Bacterial Clearance: With a little help from T cells

Specific host factors, such as immune cell activity, sex hormones and microbiota composition, influence the ability of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria to colonize the gut of mice.
  1. Troy Burtchett
  2. Neal Hammer  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Microbiology, Genetics, and Immunology, Michigan State University, United States

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (or MRSA for short) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and present a large burden for hospitals and other healthcare facilities (Murray et al., 2022). Although around a third of the population carries S. aureus – including MRSA – in the nose or on the skin without any symptoms, if these bacteria enter the body, they can cause serious, often life-threatening infections (Sakr et al., 2018; Castleman et al., 2018).

Recent studies have shown that the gut can also serve as a reservoir of MRSA (Piewngam and Otto, 2024), and around 20% of the healthy population carries the bacteria in the gut. This asymptomatic MRSA colonization ha been associated with increased risks of bloodstream infections and is also linked to increased transmission through inanimate objects in both the community and hospital settings (Squier et al., 2002). However, little is known about the strategies MRSA uses to colonize the gut and why some people are more susceptible to this colonization than others. Now, in eLife, Ken Cadwell and colleagues – including Alannah Lejeune as first author – report new insights into the factors that influence gut colonization of MRSA (Lejeune et al., 2024).

The researchers (who are based at New York University, the University of Pennsylvania and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital) studied two different populations of laboratory mice bred at New York University (NYU mice) and Jackson Laboratories (JAX mice). Female mice bred at NYU were able to clear MRSA from their gut, while both male and female JAX mice and NYU male mice were persistently colonized. These results suggest that the microbiota (the community of microbes residing within the gut) may affect colonization rates of MRSA, which is in keeping with findings from previous studies focusing on other pathogens (Caballero-Flores et al., 2023).

Analyzing the microbiota of the different mice revealed that female NYU mice harbored a distinct composition of microbes compared to JAX mice (Figure 1). Moreover, when female JAX mice were housed with female NYU mice to allow transfer of microbiota between the mice, they were able to clear MRSA. However, male and female NYU mice were found to have similar microbiota, indicating that other factors can also influence MRSA colonization in the gut. This is similar to findings in epidemiological studies in humans showing that men are more frequently colonized with MRSA, demonstrating that the mouse model can be used to represent human colonization patterns accurately (Humphreys et al., 2015).

MRSA colonization in the gut of mice is microbiota- and sex-dependent.

The gut microbiota of female and male mice bred at New York University (NYU) or Jackson Laboratories (JAX) influences the ability of MRSA bacteria to colonize the gut. The gut microbiota of NYU female mice (left panel) differs from NYU male mice (middle panel) and both male and female JAX mice (right panel). This difference provided NYU females with unique protection against MRSA colonization (microbiota effect). The immune response of NYU females after they were infected with MRSA resulted in increased counts of T-helper 17 (Th17) cells (green) and activated neutrophils (pink), which promoted clearance of MRSA (immune response effect; bottom panel). Th17 cell proliferation and neutrophil activation were not observed in NYU male mice, resulting in persistent colonization with MRSA.

Next, Lejeune et al. wanted to identify sex-dependent factors that lead to the differences observed between female and male mice. The researchers analyzed gene expression patterns that respond to MRSA colonization in the gut of male and female NYU mice, including genes associated with the activity and migration of immune cells. Male and female mice had distinct gene expression patterns. Most notably, females upregulated genes associated with T cell and neutrophil activity, cells involved with long-term immunity and rapid immune response, respectively (Sun et al., 2023).

The T cell response was unusual given the short MRSA exposure, but Lejeune et al. confirmed the importance of T cells in clearing MRSA from the gut of female mice using genetically modified mice and cell depletion assays. In particular, a specific type of T-helper cell known as the Th17 cell, which is important for activating neutrophils, was crucial for clearing MRSA (Figure 1). This supports previous findings indicating that neutrophils play a critical role in controlling MRSA colonization and infection throughout the body (Rigby and DeLeo, 2012).

To determine the mechanism of the sex-dependent immune activation in the gut, Lejeune et al. focused on two features of females that are distinct from males: the additional X chromosome and female sex hormones. Transplanting female XX immune cells into male counterparts did not eliminate MRSA from the gut of male mice, but removing ovaries, the source of female sex hormones, reversed MRSA clearance from the gut in females. Consistent with this, female mice lacking the estrogen receptor had increased levels of MRSA in their gut. Lastly, an elegant transgenic mouse experiment that allowed hormonal and chromosomal distinctions between males and females to be further decoupled provided additional evidence that female hormones promote MRSA clearance. Overall, the work demonstrates that the microbiota, an enhanced Th17 cell response and female sex hormones play pertinent roles in the clearance of MRSA from the gut.

Important considerations for future research include determining whether specific microbes within the microbiota stimulate Th17 cells in an estrogen-dependent manner to activate neutrophils that clear MRSA. Another outstanding question is whether other pathogens can be cleared from the gut via a similar mechanism. New knowledge gained using this model can be leveraged to develop new decolonization strategies to reduce the risk of invasive infections. Perhaps most importantly, this work serves as a poignant example that investigating sex as a biological variable in the context of host-pathogen interactions can lead to important discoveries.

References

    1. Murray CJL
    2. Ikuta KS
    3. Sharara F
    4. Swetschinski L
    5. Robles Aguilar G
    6. Gray A
    7. Han C
    8. Bisignano C
    9. Rao P
    10. Wool E
    11. Johnson SC
    12. Browne AJ
    13. Chipeta MG
    14. Fell F
    15. Hackett S
    16. Haines-Woodhouse G
    17. Kashef Hamadani BH
    18. Kumaran EAP
    19. McManigal B
    20. Achalapong S
    21. Agarwal R
    22. Akech S
    23. Albertson S
    24. Amuasi J
    25. Andrews J
    26. Aravkin A
    27. Ashley E
    28. Babin F-X
    29. Bailey F
    30. Baker S
    31. Basnyat B
    32. Bekker A
    33. Bender R
    34. Berkley JA
    35. Bethou A
    36. Bielicki J
    37. Boonkasidecha S
    38. Bukosia J
    39. Carvalheiro C
    40. Castañeda-Orjuela C
    41. Chansamouth V
    42. Chaurasia S
    43. Chiurchiù S
    44. Chowdhury F
    45. Clotaire Donatien R
    46. Cook AJ
    47. Cooper B
    48. Cressey TR
    49. Criollo-Mora E
    50. Cunningham M
    51. Darboe S
    52. Day NPJ
    53. De Luca M
    54. Dokova K
    55. Dramowski A
    56. Dunachie SJ
    57. Duong Bich T
    58. Eckmanns T
    59. Eibach D
    60. Emami A
    61. Feasey N
    62. Fisher-Pearson N
    63. Forrest K
    64. Garcia C
    65. Garrett D
    66. Gastmeier P
    67. Giref AZ
    68. Greer RC
    69. Gupta V
    70. Haller S
    71. Haselbeck A
    72. Hay SI
    73. Holm M
    74. Hopkins S
    75. Hsia Y
    76. Iregbu KC
    77. Jacobs J
    78. Jarovsky D
    79. Javanmardi F
    80. Jenney AWJ
    81. Khorana M
    82. Khusuwan S
    83. Kissoon N
    84. Kobeissi E
    85. Kostyanev T
    86. Krapp F
    87. Krumkamp R
    88. Kumar A
    89. Kyu HH
    90. Lim C
    91. Lim K
    92. Limmathurotsakul D
    93. Loftus MJ
    94. Lunn M
    95. Ma J
    96. Manoharan A
    97. Marks F
    98. May J
    99. Mayxay M
    100. Mturi N
    101. Munera-Huertas T
    102. Musicha P
    103. Musila LA
    104. Mussi-Pinhata MM
    105. Naidu RN
    106. Nakamura T
    107. Nanavati R
    108. Nangia S
    109. Newton P
    110. Ngoun C
    111. Novotney A
    112. Nwakanma D
    113. Obiero CW
    114. Ochoa TJ
    115. Olivas-Martinez A
    116. Olliaro P
    117. Ooko E
    118. Ortiz-Brizuela E
    119. Ounchanum P
    120. Pak GD
    121. Paredes JL
    122. Peleg AY
    123. Perrone C
    124. Phe T
    125. Phommasone K
    126. Plakkal N
    127. Ponce-de-Leon A
    128. Raad M
    129. Ramdin T
    130. Rattanavong S
    131. Riddell A
    132. Roberts T
    133. Robotham JV
    134. Roca A
    135. Rosenthal VD
    136. Rudd KE
    137. Russell N
    138. Sader HS
    139. Saengchan W
    140. Schnall J
    141. Scott JAG
    142. Seekaew S
    143. Sharland M
    144. Shivamallappa M
    145. Sifuentes-Osornio J
    146. Simpson AJ
    147. Steenkeste N
    148. Stewardson AJ
    149. Stoeva T
    150. Tasak N
    151. Thaiprakong A
    152. Thwaites G
    153. Tigoi C
    154. Turner C
    155. Turner P
    156. van Doorn HR
    157. Velaphi S
    158. Vongpradith A
    159. Vongsouvath M
    160. Vu H
    161. Walsh T
    162. Walson JL
    163. Waner S
    164. Wangrangsimakul T
    165. Wannapinij P
    166. Wozniak T
    167. Young Sharma TEMW
    168. Yu KC
    169. Zheng P
    170. Sartorius B
    171. Lopez AD
    172. Stergachis A
    173. Moore C
    174. Dolecek C
    175. Naghavi M
    (2022) Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis
    The Lancet 399:629–655.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Troy Burtchett

    Troy Burtchett is at the Department of Microbiology, Genetics, and Immunology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0002-7698-8636
  2. Neal Hammer

    Neal Hammer is at the Department of Microbiology, Genetics, and Immunology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

    For correspondence
    hammern2@msu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6148-7850

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2025, Burtchett and Hammer

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 21
    views
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Troy Burtchett
  2. Neal Hammer
(2025)
Bacterial Clearance: With a little help from T cells
eLife 14:e106854.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.106854