Host-induced bacterial cell wall decomposition mediates pattern-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis

Abstract

Peptidoglycans (PGN) are immunogenic bacterial surface patterns that trigger immune activation in metazoans and plants. It is generally unknown, how complex bacterial structures, such as PGN, are perceived by plant pattern recognition receptors (PRR) and whether host hydrolytic activities facilitate decomposition of bacterial matrices and generation of soluble PRR ligands. Here, we show that Arabidopsis thaliana upon bacterial infection or exposure to microbial patterns produces a metazoan lysozyme-like hydrolase (lysozyme 1, LYS1). LYS1 activity releases soluble PGN fragments from insoluble bacterial cell walls and cleavage products are able to trigger responses typically associated with plant immunity. Importantly, LYS1 mutant genotypes exhibit super-susceptibility to bacterial infections similar to that observed on PGN receptor mutants. We propose that plants employ hydrolytic activities for the decomposition of complex bacterial structures, and that soluble pattern generation might aid PRR-mediated immune activation in cell layers adjacent to infection sites.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xiaokun Liu

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Heini M Grabherr

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Roland Willmann

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Dagmar Kolb

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Frédéric Brunner

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Ute Bertsche

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Daniel Kühner

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Mirita Franz-Wachtel

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Bushra Amin

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Georg Felix

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Marc Ongena

    University of Liege-Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Thorsten Nürnberger

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    Thorsten Nürnberger, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  13. Andrea A Gust

    University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    andrea.gust@zmbp.uni-tuebingen.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jean T Greenberg, University of Chicago, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 2, 2013
  2. Accepted: June 20, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 23, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 22, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Liu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,944
    views
  • 516
    downloads
  • 57
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xiaokun Liu
  2. Heini M Grabherr
  3. Roland Willmann
  4. Dagmar Kolb
  5. Frédéric Brunner
  6. Ute Bertsche
  7. Daniel Kühner
  8. Mirita Franz-Wachtel
  9. Bushra Amin
  10. Georg Felix
  11. Marc Ongena
  12. Thorsten Nürnberger
  13. Andrea A Gust
(2014)
Host-induced bacterial cell wall decomposition mediates pattern-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis
eLife 3:e01990.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01990

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01990

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    Ivan Kulich, Julia Schmid ... Jiří Friml
    Research Article

    Root gravitropic bending represents a fundamental aspect of terrestrial plant physiology. Gravity is perceived by sedimentation of starch-rich plastids (statoliths) to the bottom of the central root cap cells. Following gravity perception, intercellular auxin transport is redirected downwards leading to an asymmetric auxin accumulation at the lower root side causing inhibition of cell expansion, ultimately resulting in downwards bending. How gravity-induced statoliths repositioning is translated into asymmetric auxin distribution remains unclear despite PIN auxin efflux carriers and the Negative Gravitropic Response of roots (NGR) proteins polarize along statolith sedimentation, thus providing a plausible mechanism for auxin flow redirection. In this study, using a functional NGR1-GFP construct, we visualized the NGR1 localization on the statolith surface and plasma membrane (PM) domains in close proximity to the statoliths, correlating with their movements. We determined that NGR1 binding to these PM domains is indispensable for NGR1 functionality and relies on cysteine acylation and adjacent polybasic regions as well as on lipid and sterol PM composition. Detailed timing of the early events following graviperception suggested that both NGR1 repolarization and initial auxin asymmetry precede the visible PIN3 polarization. This discrepancy motivated us to unveil a rapid, NGR-dependent translocation of PIN-activating AGCVIII kinase D6PK towards lower PMs of gravity-perceiving cells, thus providing an attractive model for rapid redirection of auxin fluxes following gravistimulation.

    1. Plant Biology
    Daniel S Yu, Megan A Outram ... Simon J Williams
    Research Article

    Plant pathogens secrete proteins, known as effectors, that function in the apoplast or inside plant cells to promote virulence. Effector recognition by cell-surface or cytosolic receptors results in the activation of defence pathways and plant immunity. Despite their importance, our general understanding of fungal effector function and recognition by immunity receptors remains poor. One complication often associated with effectors is their high sequence diversity and lack of identifiable sequence motifs precluding prediction of structure or function. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated that fungal effectors can be grouped into structural classes, despite significant sequence variation and existence across taxonomic groups. Using protein X-ray crystallography, we identify a new structural class of effectors hidden within the secreted in xylem (SIX) effectors from Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol). The recognised effectors Avr1 (SIX4) and Avr3 (SIX1) represent the founding members of the Fol dual-domain (FOLD) effector class, with members containing two distinct domains. Using AlphaFold2, we predicted the full SIX effector repertoire of Fol and show that SIX6 and SIX13 are also FOLD effectors, which we validated experimentally for SIX6. Based on structural prediction and comparisons, we show that FOLD effectors are present within three divisions of fungi and are expanded in pathogens and symbionts. Further structural comparisons demonstrate that Fol secretes effectors that adopt a limited number of structural folds during infection of tomato. This analysis also revealed a structural relationship between transcriptionally co-regulated effector pairs. We make use of the Avr1 structure to understand its recognition by the I receptor, which leads to disease resistance in tomato. This study represents an important advance in our understanding of Fol-tomato, and by extension plant–fungal interactions, which will assist in the development of novel control and engineering strategies to combat plant pathogens.