Re-examining how complexin inhibits neurotransmitter release: SNARE complex insertion or electrostatic hindrance?

  1. Thorsten Trimbuch
  2. Junjie Xu
  3. David Flaherty
  4. Diana R Tomchick
  5. Josep Rizo  Is a corresponding author
  6. Christian Rosenmund
  1. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
  2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Complexins play activating and inhibitory functions in neurotransmitter release. The complexin accessory helix inhibits release and was proposed to insert into SNARE complexes to prevent their full assembly. This model was supported by 'superclamp' and 'poor-clamp' mutations that enhanced or decreased the complexin-I inhibitory activity in cell-cell fusion assays, and by the crystal structure of a superclamp mutant bound to a synaptobrevin-truncated SNARE complex. NMR studies now show that the complexin-I accessory helix does not insert into synaptobrevin-truncated SNARE complexes in solution, and electrophysiological data reveal that superclamp mutants have slightly stimulatory or no effects on neurotransmitter release, whereas a poor-clamp mutant inhibits release. Importantly, increasing or decreasing the negative charge of the complexin-I accessory helix inhibits or stimulates release, respectively. These results suggest a new model whereby the complexin accessory helix inhibits release through electrostatic (and perhaps steric) repulsion enabled by its location between the vesicle and plasma membranes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thorsten Trimbuch

    Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Junjie Xu

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. David Flaherty

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Diana R Tomchick

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Josep Rizo

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    jose@arnie.swmed.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Christian Rosenmund

    Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    Christian Rosenmund, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Axel T Brunger, Stanford University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animals were handled according to the animal welfare committee of the Charit� Berlin, Germany. Time pregnant females were anesthetized and euthanized at E18 according to the german animal law ({section sign}4 section 1) and permit by the Berlin authorities (Landesamt f�r Gesundheit und Soziales, LaGeSo) under the permit number T0220/09.

Version history

  1. Received: January 24, 2014
  2. Accepted: May 6, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 8, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 3, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Trimbuch et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,362
    views
  • 303
    downloads
  • 69
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thorsten Trimbuch
  2. Junjie Xu
  3. David Flaherty
  4. Diana R Tomchick
  5. Josep Rizo
  6. Christian Rosenmund
(2014)
Re-examining how complexin inhibits neurotransmitter release: SNARE complex insertion or electrostatic hindrance?
eLife 3:e02391.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02391

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02391

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Shyam S Krishnakumar, Feng Li ... Karin M Reinisch
    Short Report

    We have previously proposed that complexin cross-links multiple pre-fusion SNARE complexes via a trans interaction to function as a clamp on SNARE-mediated neurotransmitter release. A recent NMR study was unable to detect the trans clamping interaction of complexin and therefore questioned the previous interpretation of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer and isothermal titration calorimetry data on which the trans clamping model was originally based. Here we present new biochemical data that underscore the validity of our previous interpretation and the continued relevancy of the trans insertion model for complexin clamping.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marco van den Noort, Panagiotis Drougkas ... Bert Poolman
    Research Article

    Bacteria utilize various strategies to prevent internal dehydration during hypertonic stress. A common approach to countering the effects of the stress is to import compatible solutes such as glycine betaine, leading to simultaneous passive water fluxes following the osmotic gradient. OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is a type I ABC-importer that uses two substrate-binding domains (SBDs) to capture extracellular glycine betaine and deliver the substrate to the transmembrane domains for subsequent transport. OpuA senses osmotic stress via changes in the internal ionic strength and is furthermore regulated by the 2nd messenger cyclic-di-AMP. We now show, by means of solution-based single-molecule FRET and analysis with multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling, that the SBDs transiently interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner. The smFRET data are in accordance with the apparent cooperativity in transport and supported by new cryo-EM data of OpuA. We propose that the physical interactions between SBDs and cooperativity in substrate delivery are part of the transport mechanism.