Loss of Cdc42 leads to defects in synaptic plasticity and remote memory recall

  1. Il Hwan Kim
  2. Hong Wang
  3. Scott H Soderling
  4. Ryohei Yasuda  Is a corresponding author
  1. Duke University Medical School, United States
  2. Max Planck Florida Institute, United States

Abstract

Cdc42 is a signaling protein important for reorganization of actin cytoskeleton and morphogenesis of cells. However, the functional role of Cdc42 in synaptic plasticity and in behaviors such as learning and memory are not well understood. Here we report that postnatal forebrain deletion of Cdc42 leads to deficits in the synaptic plasticity and in remote memory recall using conditional knockout of Cdc42. We found that deletion of Cdc42 impaired LTP in the Schaffer collateral synapses and postsynaptic structural plasticity of dendritic spines in CA1 pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus. Additionally, loss of Cdc42 did not affect memory acquisition, but instead significantly impaired remote memory recall. Together these results indicate that the postnatal functions of Cdc42 may be crucial for the synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons, which contribute to the capacity for remote memory recall.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Il Hwan Kim

    Duke University Medical School, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Hong Wang

    Duke University Medical School, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Scott H Soderling

    Duke University Medical School, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ryohei Yasuda

    Max Planck Florida Institute, Jupiter, United States
    For correspondence
    ryohei.yasuda@mpfi.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Eunjoon Kim, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) of the Duke University Medical Center and the approved animal protocols are A113-11-05 and A288-11-11. The institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.

Version history

  1. Received: March 19, 2014
  2. Accepted: July 6, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 8, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 1, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 3,156
    views
  • 468
    downloads
  • 83
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Il Hwan Kim
  2. Hong Wang
  3. Scott H Soderling
  4. Ryohei Yasuda
(2014)
Loss of Cdc42 leads to defects in synaptic plasticity and remote memory recall
eLife 3:e02839.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02839

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02839

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.