Assembly principles of a unique cage formed by hexameric and decameric E. coli proteins

  1. Hélène Malet
  2. Kaiyin Liu
  3. Majida El Bakkourri
  4. Sze Wah Samuel Chan
  5. Gregory Effantin
  6. Maria Bacia
  7. Walid A Houry
  8. Irina Gutsche  Is a corresponding author
  1. CNRS, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, France
  2. University of Toronto, Canada
  3. CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, France
  4. CEA, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, France

Abstract

A 3.3 MDa macromolecular cage between two E. coli proteins with seemingly incompatible symmetries - the hexameric AAA+ ATPase RavA and the decameric inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI - is reconstructed by cryo-electron microscopy to 11 Å resolution. Combined with a 7.5 Å resolution reconstruction of the minimal complex between LdcI and the LdcI-binding domain of RavA, and the previously solved crystal structures of the individual components, this work enables to build a reliable pseudoatomic model of this unusual architecture and to identify conformational rearrangements and specific elements essential for complex formation. The design of the cage created via lateral interactions between five RavA rings is unique for the diverse AAA+ ATPase superfamily.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hélène Malet

    CNRS, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kaiyin Liu

    University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Majida El Bakkourri

    University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sze Wah Samuel Chan

    University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gregory Effantin

    CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Maria Bacia

    CEA, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Walid A Houry

    University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Irina Gutsche

    CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    gutsche@embl.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Sjors HW Scheres, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: June 11, 2014
  2. Accepted: July 28, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 5, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 29, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Malet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,723
    views
  • 184
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hélène Malet
  2. Kaiyin Liu
  3. Majida El Bakkourri
  4. Sze Wah Samuel Chan
  5. Gregory Effantin
  6. Maria Bacia
  7. Walid A Houry
  8. Irina Gutsche
(2014)
Assembly principles of a unique cage formed by hexameric and decameric E. coli proteins
eLife 3:e03653.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03653

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03653

Further reading

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Giulio Facchini, Alann Rathery ... Andrea Perna
    Research Article

    Termites build complex nests which are an impressive example of self-organization. We know that the coordinated actions involved in the construction of these nests by multiple individuals are primarily mediated by signals and cues embedded in the structure of the nest itself. However, to date there is still no scientific consensus about the nature of the stimuli that guide termite construction, and how they are sensed by termites. In order to address these questions, we studied the early building behavior of Coptotermes gestroi termites in artificial arenas, decorated with topographic cues to stimulate construction. Pellet collections were evenly distributed across the experimental setup, compatible with a collection mechanism that is not affected by local topography, but only by the distribution of termite occupancy (termites pick pellets at the positions where they are). Conversely, pellet depositions were concentrated at locations of high surface curvature and at the boundaries between different types of substrate. The single feature shared by all pellet deposition regions was that they correspond to local maxima in the evaporation flux. We can show analytically and we confirm experimentally that evaporation flux is directly proportional to the local curvature of nest surfaces. Taken together, our results indicate that surface curvature is sufficient to organize termite building activity and that termites likely sense curvature indirectly through substrate evaporation. Our findings reconcile the apparently discordant results of previous studies.