Synaptic plasticity and cognitive function are disrupted in the absence of Lrp4

  1. Andrea M Gomez
  2. Robert C Froemke
  3. Steven J Burden  Is a corresponding author
  1. Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, NYU Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Lrp4, the muscle receptor for neuronal Agrin, is expressed in the hippocampus and areas involved in cognition. The function of Lrp4 in the brain, however, is unknown, as Lrp4-/- mice fail to form neuromuscular synapses and die at birth. Lrp4-/- mice, rescued for Lrp4 expression selectively in muscle, survive into adulthood and showed profound deficits in cognitive tasks that assess learning and memory. To learn whether synapses form and function aberrantly, we used electrophysiological and anatomical methods to study hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses. In the absence of Lrp4, the organization of the hippocampus appeared normal, but the frequency of spontaneous release events and spine density on primary apical dendrites were reduced. CA3 input was unable to adequately depolarize CA1 neurons to induce long-term-potentiation. Our studies demonstrate a role for Lrp4 in hippocampal function and suggest that patients with mutations in Lrp4 or autoantibodies to Lrp4 should be evaluated for neurological deficits.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrea M Gomez

    Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, NYU Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Robert C Froemke

    Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, NYU Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Steven J Burden

    Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, NYU Medical Center, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    steve.burden@med.nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christian Rosenmund, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by the New York University School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol 140406-01).

Version history

  1. Received: August 10, 2014
  2. Accepted: November 19, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 19, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 15, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Gomez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,743
    views
  • 414
    downloads
  • 38
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrea M Gomez
  2. Robert C Froemke
  3. Steven J Burden
(2014)
Synaptic plasticity and cognitive function are disrupted in the absence of Lrp4
eLife 3:e04287.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04287

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04287

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ivan Tomić, Paul M Bays
    Research Article

    Probing memory of a complex visual image within a few hundred milliseconds after its disappearance reveals significantly greater fidelity of recall than if the probe is delayed by as little as a second. Classically interpreted, the former taps into a detailed but rapidly decaying visual sensory or ‘iconic’ memory (IM), while the latter relies on capacity-limited but comparatively stable visual working memory (VWM). While iconic decay and VWM capacity have been extensively studied independently, currently no single framework quantitatively accounts for the dynamics of memory fidelity over these time scales. Here, we extend a stationary neural population model of VWM with a temporal dimension, incorporating rapid sensory-driven accumulation of activity encoding each visual feature in memory, and a slower accumulation of internal error that causes memorized features to randomly drift over time. Instead of facilitating read-out from an independent sensory store, an early cue benefits recall by lifting the effective limit on VWM signal strength imposed when multiple items compete for representation, allowing memory for the cued item to be supplemented with information from the decaying sensory trace. Empirical measurements of human recall dynamics validate these predictions while excluding alternative model architectures. A key conclusion is that differences in capacity classically thought to distinguish IM and VWM are in fact contingent upon a single resource-limited WM store.

    1. Neuroscience
    Emilio Salinas, Bashirul I Sheikh
    Insight

    Our ability to recall details from a remembered image depends on a single mechanism that is engaged from the very moment the image disappears from view.