Causal manipulation of functional connectivity in a specific neural pathway during behaviour and at rest

  1. Vanessa M Johnen  Is a corresponding author
  2. Franz-Xaver Neubert
  3. Ethan R Buch
  4. Lennart M Verhagen
  5. Jill O'Reilly
  6. Rogier B Mars
  7. Matthew F S Rushworth
  1. Oxford University, United Kingdom
  2. National Institutes of Health, United States

Abstract

Correlations in brain activity between two areas (functional connectivity) have been shown to relate to their underlying structural connections. We examine the possibility that functional connectivity also reflects short-term changes in synaptic efficacy. We demonstrate that paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) near ventral premotor cortex (PMv) and primary motor cortex (M1) with a short 8ms inter-pulse interval evoking synchronous pre- and post-synaptic activity and which strengthens interregional connectivity between the two areas in a pattern consistent with Hebbian plasticity, leads to increased functional connectivity between PMv and M1 as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Moreover, we show that strengthening connectivity between these nodes has effects on a wider network of areas, such as decreasing coupling in a parallel motor programming stream. A control experiment revealed that identical TMS pulses at identical frequencies caused no change in fMRI-measured functional connectivity when the inter-pulse-interval was too long for Hebbian-like plasticity.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vanessa M Johnen

    Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    vanessa.johnen@psy.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Franz-Xaver Neubert

    Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ethan R Buch

    Human Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lennart M Verhagen

    Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jill O'Reilly

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rogier B Mars

    Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Matthew F S Rushworth

    Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jody C Culham, University of Western Ontario, Canada

Ethics

Human subjects: Human subjects: Informed consent, including consent to publish was obtained from all subjects. The study was performed in accordance with local ethics committee approval (MKREC REF 07/Q1603/11 and Berkshire REC 11/SC/0537).

Version history

  1. Received: September 3, 2014
  2. Accepted: February 8, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 9, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 10, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 3,341
    views
  • 776
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vanessa M Johnen
  2. Franz-Xaver Neubert
  3. Ethan R Buch
  4. Lennart M Verhagen
  5. Jill O'Reilly
  6. Rogier B Mars
  7. Matthew F S Rushworth
(2015)
Causal manipulation of functional connectivity in a specific neural pathway during behaviour and at rest
eLife 4:e04585.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04585

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04585

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.