Endocannabinoid dynamics gate spike-timing dependent depression and potentiation

  1. Yihui Cui
  2. Ilya Prokin
  3. Hao Xu
  4. Bruno Delord
  5. Stephane Genet
  6. Laurent Venance
  7. Hugues Berry  Is a corresponding author
  1. College de France, France
  2. French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation, France
  3. University Pierre et Marie Curie, France

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity is a cardinal cellular mechanism for learning and memory. The endocannabinoid (eCB) system has emerged as a pivotal pathway for synaptic plasticity because of its widely characterized ability to depress synaptic transmission on short- and long-term scales. Recent reports indicate that eCBs also mediate potentiation of the synapse. However it is not known how eCB signaling may support bidirectionality. Here, we combined electrophysiology experiments with mathematical modeling to question the mechanisms of eCB bidirectionality in spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) at corticostriatal synapses. We demonstrate that STDP outcome is controlled by eCB levels and dynamics: prolonged and moderate levels of eCB lead to eCB-mediated long-term depression (eCB-tLTD) while short and large eCB transients produce eCB-mediated long-term potentiation (eCB-tLTP). Moreover, we show that eCB-tLTD requires active calcineurin whereas eCB-tLTP necessitates the activity of presynaptic PKA. Therefore, just like glutamate or GABA, eCB form a bidirectional system to encode learning and memory.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yihui Cui

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, College de France, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ilya Prokin

    French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hao Xu

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, College de France, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Bruno Delord

    University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Stephane Genet

    University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Laurent Venance

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, College de France, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hugues Berry

    French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation, Villeurbanne, France
    For correspondence
    hugues.berry@inria.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Upinder S Bhalla, National Centre for Biological Sciences, India

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in accordance with local animal welfare committee (Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology and EU guidelines, directive 2010/63/EU).

Version history

  1. Received: November 19, 2015
  2. Accepted: February 26, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 27, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 16, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Cui et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,272
    views
  • 605
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yihui Cui
  2. Ilya Prokin
  3. Hao Xu
  4. Bruno Delord
  5. Stephane Genet
  6. Laurent Venance
  7. Hugues Berry
(2016)
Endocannabinoid dynamics gate spike-timing dependent depression and potentiation
eLife 5:e13185.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13185

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13185

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ivan Tomić, Paul M Bays
    Research Article

    Probing memory of a complex visual image within a few hundred milliseconds after its disappearance reveals significantly greater fidelity of recall than if the probe is delayed by as little as a second. Classically interpreted, the former taps into a detailed but rapidly decaying visual sensory or ‘iconic’ memory (IM), while the latter relies on capacity-limited but comparatively stable visual working memory (VWM). While iconic decay and VWM capacity have been extensively studied independently, currently no single framework quantitatively accounts for the dynamics of memory fidelity over these time scales. Here, we extend a stationary neural population model of VWM with a temporal dimension, incorporating rapid sensory-driven accumulation of activity encoding each visual feature in memory, and a slower accumulation of internal error that causes memorized features to randomly drift over time. Instead of facilitating read-out from an independent sensory store, an early cue benefits recall by lifting the effective limit on VWM signal strength imposed when multiple items compete for representation, allowing memory for the cued item to be supplemented with information from the decaying sensory trace. Empirical measurements of human recall dynamics validate these predictions while excluding alternative model architectures. A key conclusion is that differences in capacity classically thought to distinguish IM and VWM are in fact contingent upon a single resource-limited WM store.

    1. Neuroscience
    Emilio Salinas, Bashirul I Sheikh
    Insight

    Our ability to recall details from a remembered image depends on a single mechanism that is engaged from the very moment the image disappears from view.