Abstract

Increased extracellular proton concentrations during neurotransmission are converted to excitatory sodium influx by acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs). 10-fold sodium/potassium selectivity in ASICs has long been attributed to a central constriction in the channel pore, but experimental verification is lacking due to the sensitivity of this structure to conventional manipulations. Here, we explored the basis for ion selectivity by incorporating unnatural amino acids into the channel, engineering channel stoichiometry and performing free energy simulations. We observed no preference for sodium at the 'GAS belt' in the central constriction. Instead, we identified a band of glutamate and aspartate side chains at the lower end of the pore that enables preferential sodium conduction.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Timothy Lynagh

    Center for Biopharmaceuticals, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4888-4098
  2. Emelie Flood

    School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Céline Boiteux

    School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Matthias Wulf

    Center for Biopharmaceuticals, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Vitaly V Komnatnyy

    Center for Biopharmaceuticals, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Janne M Colding

    Center for Biopharmaceuticals, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Toby W Allen

    School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Stephan A Pless

    Center for Biopharmaceuticals, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    For correspondence
    stephan.pless@sund.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6654-114X

Funding

Lundbeckfonden (Lundbeck Foundation Fellowship R139-2012-12390)

  • Stephan A Pless

Carlsbergfondet (Equipment Grant 2013_01_0439)

  • Stephan A Pless

Det Frie Forskningsråd (Postdoctoral Fellowship 4092-00348B)

  • Timothy Lynagh

Australian Research Council (Project Grant DP170101732)

  • Toby W Allen

Novo Nordisk Foundation (Project Grant)

  • Stephan A Pless

National Health and Medical Research Council (Project Grant APP1104259)

  • Toby W Allen

National Institutes of Health (Project Grant U01-11567710)

  • Toby W Allen

Lundbeckfonden (Postdoctoral Fellowship R171-2014-558)

  • Timothy Lynagh

National Cancer Institute (dd7)

  • Toby W Allen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Baron Chanda, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations by the by the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration and approved under license 2014−15−0201−00031. Surgery was performed on Xenopus laevis frogs anaesthetized in 0.3% tricaine.

Version history

  1. Received: December 23, 2016
  2. Accepted: May 11, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 12, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 30, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Lynagh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,542
    views
  • 601
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Timothy Lynagh
  2. Emelie Flood
  3. Céline Boiteux
  4. Matthias Wulf
  5. Vitaly V Komnatnyy
  6. Janne M Colding
  7. Toby W Allen
  8. Stephan A Pless
(2017)
A selectivity filter at the intracellular end of the acid-sensing ion channel pore
eLife 6:e24630.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24630

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24630

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.