Functional limb muscle innervation prior to cholinergic transmitter specification during early metamorphosis in Xenopus

  1. Francois M Lambert  Is a corresponding author
  2. Laura Cardoit
  3. Elric Courty
  4. Marion Bougerol
  5. Muriel Thoby-Brisson
  6. John Simmers
  7. Hervé Tostivint
  8. Didier Le Ray
  1. CNRS Université de Bordeaux, France
  2. CNRS Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, France

Abstract

In vertebrates, functional motoneurons are defined as differentiated neurons that are connected to a central premotor network and activate peripheral muscle using acetylcholine. Generally, motoneurons and muscles develop simultaneously during embryogenesis. However, during Xenopus metamorphosis, developing limb motoneurons must reach their target muscles through the already established larval cholinergic axial neuromuscular system. Here, we demonstrate that at metamorphosis onset, spinal neurons retrogradely labeled from the emerging hindlimbs initially express neither choline acetyltransferase nor vesicular acetylcholine transporter. Nevertheless, they are positive for the motoneuronal transcription factor Islet1/2 and exhibit intrinsic and axial locomotor-driven electrophysiological activity. Moreover, the early appendicular motoneurons activate developing limb muscles via nicotinic antagonist-resistant, glutamate antagonist-sensitive, neuromuscular synapses. Coincidently, the hindlimb muscles transiently express glutamate, but not nicotinic receptors. Subsequently, both pre- and postsynaptic neuromuscular partners switch definitively to typical cholinergic transmitter signaling. Thus, our results demonstrate a novel context-dependent re-specification of neurotransmitter phenotype during neuromuscular system development.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are available via Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.9sj250q).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Francois M Lambert

    INCIA UMR 5287, CNRS Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    For correspondence
    francois.lambert@u-bordeaux.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8655-2652
  2. Laura Cardoit

    INCIA UMR 5287, CNRS Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Elric Courty

    INCIA UMR 5287, CNRS Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marion Bougerol

    ERE UMR 7221, CNRS Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Muriel Thoby-Brisson

    INCIA UMR 5287, CNRS Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3214-1724
  6. John Simmers

    INCIA UMR 5287, CNRS Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hervé Tostivint

    ERE UMR 7221, CNRS Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Didier Le Ray

    INCIA UMR 5287, CNRS Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Didier Le Ray

Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Actions thématiques du Museum)

  • Hervé Tostivint

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Carol A Mason, Columbia University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were carried out in accordance with, and approved by, the local ethics committee (protocols no. 68-019) to H. Tostivint and no. 2016011518042273 APAFIS no. 3612 to DLR)

Version history

  1. Received: July 25, 2017
  2. Accepted: May 6, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 30, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 12, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Lambert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,331
    views
  • 197
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Francois M Lambert
  2. Laura Cardoit
  3. Elric Courty
  4. Marion Bougerol
  5. Muriel Thoby-Brisson
  6. John Simmers
  7. Hervé Tostivint
  8. Didier Le Ray
(2018)
Functional limb muscle innervation prior to cholinergic transmitter specification during early metamorphosis in Xenopus
eLife 7:e30693.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30693

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30693

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kenta Abe, Yuki Kambe ... Tatsuo Sato
    Research Article

    Midbrain dopamine neurons impact neural processing in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) through mesocortical projections. However, the signals conveyed by dopamine projections to the PFC remain unclear, particularly at the single-axon level. Here, we investigated dopaminergic axonal activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) during reward and aversive processing. By optimizing microprism-mediated two-photon calcium imaging of dopamine axon terminals, we found diverse activity in dopamine axons responsive to both reward and aversive stimuli. Some axons exhibited a preference for reward, while others favored aversive stimuli, and there was a strong bias for the latter at the population level. Long-term longitudinal imaging revealed that the preference was maintained in reward- and aversive-preferring axons throughout classical conditioning in which rewarding and aversive stimuli were paired with preceding auditory cues. However, as mice learned to discriminate reward or aversive cues, a cue activity preference gradually developed only in aversive-preferring axons. We inferred the trial-by-trial cue discrimination based on machine learning using anticipatory licking or facial expressions, and found that successful discrimination was accompanied by sharper selectivity for the aversive cue in aversive-preferring axons. Our findings indicate that a group of mesocortical dopamine axons encodes aversive-related signals, which are modulated by both classical conditioning across days and trial-by-trial discrimination within a day.

    1. Neuroscience
    Baiwei Liu, Zampeta-Sofia Alexopoulou, Freek van Ede
    Research Article

    Working memory enables us to bridge past sensory information to upcoming future behaviour. Accordingly, by its very nature, working memory is concerned with two components: the past and the future. Yet, in conventional laboratory tasks, these two components are often conflated, such as when sensory information in working memory is encoded and tested at the same location. We developed a task in which we dissociated the past (encoded location) and future (to-be-tested location) attributes of visual contents in working memory. This enabled us to independently track the utilisation of past and future memory attributes through gaze, as observed during mnemonic selection. Our results reveal the joint consideration of past and future locations. This was prevalent even at the single-trial level of individual saccades that were jointly biased to the past and future. This uncovers the rich nature of working memory representations, whereby both past and future memory attributes are retained and can be accessed together when memory contents become relevant for behaviour.