MERS-CoV spillover at the camel-human interface
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
- University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Abstract
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a zoonotic virus from camels causing significant mortality and morbidity in humans in the Arabian Peninsula. The epidemiology of the virus remains poorly understood, and while case-based and seroepidemiological studies have been employed extensively throughout the epidemic, viral sequence data have not been utilised to their full potential. Here we use existing MERS-CoV sequence data to explore its phylodynamics in two of its known major hosts, humans and camels. We employ structured coalescent models to show that long-term MERS-CoV evolution occurs exclusively in camels, whereas humans act as a transient, and ultimately terminal host. By analysing the distribution of human outbreak cluster sizes and zoonotic introduction times we show that human outbreaks in the Arabian peninsula are driven by seasonally varying zoonotic transfer of viruses from camels. Without heretofore unseen evolution of host tropism, MERS-CoV is unlikely to become endemic in humans.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (R35 GM119774-01)
- Trevor Bedford
Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew Biomedical Scholar)
- Trevor Bedford
European Commission (278433-PREDEMICS)
- Andrew Rambaut
Wellcome (206298/Z/17/Z)
- Andrew Rambaut
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Mahan Postdoctoral Fellowship)
- Gytis Dudas
European Commission (725422-RESERVOIRDOCS)
- Andrew Rambaut
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Neil M Ferguson, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
Version history
- Received: August 14, 2017
- Accepted: December 19, 2017
- Accepted Manuscript published: January 16, 2018 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: January 22, 2018 (version 2)
- Version of Record updated: April 19, 2018 (version 3)
Copyright
© 2018, Dudas et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 9,298
- views
-
- 1,013
- downloads
-
- 147
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
MERS-CoV spillover at the camel-human interface
eLife 7:e31257.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31257
Further reading
-
- Epidemiology and Global Health
We discuss 12 misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes concerning the use of covariates in observational or nonrandomized research. Additionally, we offer advice to help investigators, editors, reviewers, and readers make more informed decisions about conducting and interpreting research where the influence of covariates may be at issue. We primarily address misperceptions in the context of statistical management of the covariates through various forms of modeling, although we also emphasize design and model or variable selection. Other approaches to addressing the effects of covariates, including matching, have logical extensions from what we discuss here but are not dwelled upon heavily. The misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes we discuss include accurate representation of covariates, effects of measurement error, overreliance on covariate categorization, underestimation of power loss when controlling for covariates, misinterpretation of significance in statistical models, and misconceptions about confounding variables, selecting on a collider, and p value interpretations in covariate-inclusive analyses. This condensed overview serves to correct common errors and improve research quality in general and in nutrition research specifically.
