Necdin shapes serotonergic development and SERT activity modulating breathing in a mouse model for Prader-Willi Syndrome

  1. Valéry Matarazzo  Is a corresponding author
  2. Laura Caccialupi
  3. Fabienne Schaller
  4. Yuri Shvarev
  5. Nazim Kourdougli
  6. Alessandra Bertoni
  7. Clément Menuet
  8. Nicolas Voituron
  9. Evan Deneris
  10. Patricia Gaspar
  11. Laurent Bezin
  12. Pascale Durbec
  13. Gérard Hilaire
  14. Françoise Muscatelli  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, France
  2. Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
  3. UFR STAPS, Université Paris 13, France
  4. Case Western Reserve University, United States
  5. INSERM, U839, Institut du Fer à Moulin, France
  6. Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France
  7. Aix Marseille University CNRS, France

Abstract

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder that presents with hypotonia and respiratory distress in neonates. The Necdin-deficient mouse is the only model that reproduces the respiratory phenotype of PWS (central apnea and blunted response to respiratory challenges). Here, we report that Necdin deletion disturbs the migration of serotonin (5-HT) neuronal precursors, leading to altered global serotonergic neuroarchitecture and increased spontaneous firing of 5-HT neurons. We show an increased expression and activity of 5-HT Transporter (SERT/Slc6a4) in 5-HT neurons leading to an increase of 5-HT uptake. In Necdin-KO pups, the genetic deletion of Slc6a4 or treatment with Fluoxetine, a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, restored normal breathing. Unexpectedly, Fluoxetine administration was associated with respiratory side effects in wild-type animals. Overall, our results demonstrate that an increase of SERT activity is sufficient to cause the apneas in Necdin-KO pups, and that Fluoxetine may offer therapeutic benefits to PWS patients with respiratory complications.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Valéry Matarazzo

    INSERM U901, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    For correspondence
    valery.matarazzo@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0833-203X
  2. Laura Caccialupi

    INSERM U901, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Fabienne Schaller

    INSERM U901, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yuri Shvarev

    Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6622-1453
  5. Nazim Kourdougli

    INSERM U901, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8725-792X
  6. Alessandra Bertoni

    INSERM U901, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Clément Menuet

    INSERM U901, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7419-6427
  8. Nicolas Voituron

    UFR STAPS, Université Paris 13, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2092-4900
  9. Evan Deneris

    Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Patricia Gaspar

    INSERM, U839, Institut du Fer à Moulin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4217-5717
  11. Laurent Bezin

    CNRS, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Pascale Durbec

    IBDM UMR7288, Aix Marseille University CNRS, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9660-1809
  13. Gérard Hilaire

    INSERM U901, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Françoise Muscatelli

    INSERM U901, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    For correspondence
    francoise.muscatelli@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4001-6528

Funding

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale

  • Valéry Matarazzo
  • Laura Caccialupi
  • Fabienne Schaller
  • Nazim Kourdougli
  • Alessandra Bertoni
  • Clément Menuet
  • Patricia Gaspar
  • Françoise Muscatelli

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Laurent Bezin
  • Pascale Durbec
  • Gérard Hilaire
  • Françoise Muscatelli

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (PRAGEDER ANR14-CE13-0025-01)

  • Valéry Matarazzo
  • Fabienne Schaller
  • Yuri Shvarev
  • Clément Menuet
  • Nicolas Voituron
  • Gérard Hilaire
  • Françoise Muscatelli

Stiftelsen Frimurare Barnhuset i Stockholm

  • Yuri Shvarev

Kronprinsessan Lovisas Forening for Barnasjukvard

  • Yuri Shvarev

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joseph G Gleeson, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice were handled and cared for in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (N.R.C., 1996) and the European Communities Council Directive of September 22th 2010 (2010/63/EU, 74). Experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee guidelines for animal research with the accreditation no. B13-055-19 from the French Ministry of Agriculture.

Version history

  1. Received: October 9, 2017
  2. Accepted: October 29, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 31, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 1, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Matarazzo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,352
    views
  • 248
    downloads
  • 26
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Valéry Matarazzo
  2. Laura Caccialupi
  3. Fabienne Schaller
  4. Yuri Shvarev
  5. Nazim Kourdougli
  6. Alessandra Bertoni
  7. Clément Menuet
  8. Nicolas Voituron
  9. Evan Deneris
  10. Patricia Gaspar
  11. Laurent Bezin
  12. Pascale Durbec
  13. Gérard Hilaire
  14. Françoise Muscatelli
(2017)
Necdin shapes serotonergic development and SERT activity modulating breathing in a mouse model for Prader-Willi Syndrome
eLife 6:e32640.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32640

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32640

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ivan Tomić, Paul M Bays
    Research Article

    Probing memory of a complex visual image within a few hundred milliseconds after its disappearance reveals significantly greater fidelity of recall than if the probe is delayed by as little as a second. Classically interpreted, the former taps into a detailed but rapidly decaying visual sensory or ‘iconic’ memory (IM), while the latter relies on capacity-limited but comparatively stable visual working memory (VWM). While iconic decay and VWM capacity have been extensively studied independently, currently no single framework quantitatively accounts for the dynamics of memory fidelity over these time scales. Here, we extend a stationary neural population model of VWM with a temporal dimension, incorporating rapid sensory-driven accumulation of activity encoding each visual feature in memory, and a slower accumulation of internal error that causes memorized features to randomly drift over time. Instead of facilitating read-out from an independent sensory store, an early cue benefits recall by lifting the effective limit on VWM signal strength imposed when multiple items compete for representation, allowing memory for the cued item to be supplemented with information from the decaying sensory trace. Empirical measurements of human recall dynamics validate these predictions while excluding alternative model architectures. A key conclusion is that differences in capacity classically thought to distinguish IM and VWM are in fact contingent upon a single resource-limited WM store.

    1. Neuroscience
    Emilio Salinas, Bashirul I Sheikh
    Insight

    Our ability to recall details from a remembered image depends on a single mechanism that is engaged from the very moment the image disappears from view.