N501Y mutation of spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 strengthens its binding to receptor ACE2

  1. Fang Tian
  2. Bei Tong  Is a corresponding author
  3. Liang Sun
  4. Shengchao Shi
  5. Bin Zheng
  6. Zibin Wang
  7. Xianchi Dong  Is a corresponding author
  8. Peng Zheng  Is a corresponding author
  1. Nanjing University, China
  2. Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is spreading around the world for the past year. Recently, several variants such as B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), and P.1 (Gamma), sharing a key mutation N501Y on the RBD, appear to be more infectious to humans. To understand the underlying mechanism, we performed cell surface binding assay, kinetics study, single-molecule technique, and computational method to investigate the interaction between these RBD (mutations) and ACE2. Remarkably, RBD with the N501Y mutation exhibited a considerably stronger interaction, with a faster association rate and slower dissociation rate. Consistently, atomic force microscopy-based single-molecule force microscopy quantifies their strength showing a higher binding probability and unbinding force for the mutation. Molecular dynamics simulations of RBD-ACE2 complexes indicated that the N501Y introduced additional π-π and π-cation interaction for the higher force/interaction. Taken together, we suggested that the reinforced interaction from N501Y mutation in RBD should play an essential role in the higher transmission of SARS-CoV-2 variants and future mutations in the RBD of the virus should be under surveillance.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have provided for Figures 1-4.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fang Tian

    School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Bei Tong

    Institute of Botany, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China
    For correspondence
    beitong@cnbg.net
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Liang Sun

    School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shengchao Shi

    Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bin Zheng

    Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Zibin Wang

    School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Xianchi Dong

    School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
    For correspondence
    xianchidong@nju.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Peng Zheng

    Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
    For correspondence
    pengz@nju.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4792-6364

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0509000)

  • Xianchi Dong

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (14380205)

  • Peng Zheng

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200058)

  • Peng Zheng

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20202004)

  • Peng Zheng

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190275)

  • Xianchi Dong

National Natural Science Foundation of China (21771103)

  • Peng Zheng

National Natural Science Foundation of China (21977047)

  • Peng Zheng

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Aaron Frank, University of Michigan, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: February 15, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: April 4, 2021
  3. Accepted: August 19, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 20, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 17, 2021 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: December 14, 2021 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Tian et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,281
    views
  • 834
    downloads
  • 246
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Fang Tian
  2. Bei Tong
  3. Liang Sun
  4. Shengchao Shi
  5. Bin Zheng
  6. Zibin Wang
  7. Xianchi Dong
  8. Peng Zheng
(2021)
N501Y mutation of spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 strengthens its binding to receptor ACE2
eLife 10:e69091.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69091

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69091

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.