Spatiotemporal ecological chaos enables gradual evolutionary diversification without niches or tradeoffs

  1. Aditya Mahadevan
  2. Michael T Pearce
  3. Daniel S Fisher  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Meta Data Science, United States

Abstract

Ecological and evolutionary dynamics are intrinsically entwined. On short timescales, ecological interactions determine the fate and impact of new mutants, while on longer timescales evolution shapes the entire community. Here we study the evolution of large numbers of closely related strains with generalized Lotka Volterra interactions but no niche structure. Host-pathogen-like interactions drive the community into a spatiotemporally chaotic state characterized by continual, spatially-local, blooms and busts. Upon the slow serial introduction of new strains, the community diversifies indefinitely, accommodating an arbitrarily large number of strains in spite of the absence of stabilizing niche interactions. The diversifying phase persists - albeit with gradually slowing diversification - in the presence of general, nonspecific, fitness differences between strains, which break the assumption of tradeoffs inherent in much previous work. Building on a dynamical-mean field-theory analysis of the ecological dynamics, an approximate effective model captures the evolution of the diversity and distributions of key properties. This work establishes a potential scenario for understanding how the interplay between evolution and ecology - in particular coevolution of a bacterial and a generalist phage species - could give rise to the extensive fine-scale diversity that is ubiquitous in the microbial world.

Data availability

The current manuscript is a computational study, so no data have been generated for this manuscript. Simulations use only standard algorithms: details in paper.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Aditya Mahadevan

    Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michael T Pearce

    Meta Data Science, Menlo Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel S Fisher

    Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    dsfisher@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5559-2491

Funding

National Science Foundation (PHY-160760 and PHY-2210386)

  • Aditya Mahadevan
  • Michael T Pearce
  • Daniel S Fisher

National Institutes of Health (R01AI13699201)

  • Aditya Mahadevan
  • Daniel S Fisher

Simons Foundation (Sabbatical Fellowship)

  • Daniel S Fisher

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Armita Nourmohammad, University of Washington, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: May 28, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 16, 2022
  3. Accepted: April 27, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 28, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 28, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Mahadevan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 946
    views
  • 210
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Aditya Mahadevan
  2. Michael T Pearce
  3. Daniel S Fisher
(2023)
Spatiotemporal ecological chaos enables gradual evolutionary diversification without niches or tradeoffs
eLife 12:e82734.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82734

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82734

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Ecology
    Kazushi Tsutsui, Ryoya Tanaka ... Keisuke Fujii
    Research Article

    Collaborative hunting, in which predators play different and complementary roles to capture prey, has been traditionally believed to be an advanced hunting strategy requiring large brains that involve high-level cognition. However, recent findings that collaborative hunting has also been documented in smaller-brained vertebrates have placed this previous belief under strain. Here, using computational multi-agent simulations based on deep reinforcement learning, we demonstrate that decisions underlying collaborative hunts do not necessarily rely on sophisticated cognitive processes. We found that apparently elaborate coordination can be achieved through a relatively simple decision process of mapping between states and actions related to distance-dependent internal representations formed by prior experience. Furthermore, we confirmed that this decision rule of predators is robust against unknown prey controlled by humans. Our computational ecological results emphasize that collaborative hunting can emerge in various intra- and inter-specific interactions in nature, and provide insights into the evolution of sociality.

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Théo Constant, F Stephen Dobson ... Sylvain Giroud
    Research Article

    Seasonal animal dormancy is widely interpreted as a physiological response for surviving energetic challenges during the harshest times of the year (the physiological constraint hypothesis). However, there are other mutually non-exclusive hypotheses to explain the timing of animal dormancy, that is, entry into and emergence from hibernation (i.e. dormancy phenology). Survival advantages of dormancy that have been proposed are reduced risks of predation and competition (the ‘life-history’ hypothesis), but comparative tests across animal species are few. Using the phylogenetic comparative method applied to more than 20 hibernating mammalian species, we found support for both hypotheses as explanations for the phenology of dormancy. In accordance with the life-history hypotheses, sex differences in hibernation emergence and immergence were favored by the sex difference in reproductive effort. In addition, physiological constraint may influence the trade-off between survival and reproduction such that low temperatures and precipitation, as well as smaller body mass, influence sex differences in phenology. We also compiled initial evidence that ectotherm dormancy may be (1) less temperature dependent than previously thought and (2) associated with trade-offs consistent with the life-history hypothesis. Thus, dormancy during non-life-threatening periods that are unfavorable for reproduction may be more widespread than previously thought.