Disruption of awake sharp-wave ripples does not affect memorization of locations in repeated-acquisition spatial memory tasks

  1. Lies Deceuninck  Is a corresponding author
  2. Fabian Kloosterman  Is a corresponding author
  1. KU Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Storing and accessing memories is required to successfully perform day-to-day tasks, for example for engaging in a meaningful conversation. Previous studies in both rodents and primates have correlated hippocampal cellular activity with behavioral expression of memory. A key role has been attributed to awake hippocampal replay - a sequential reactivation of neurons representing a trajectory through space. However, it is unclear if awake replay impacts immediate future behavior, gradually creates and stabilizes long-term memories over a long period of time (hours and longer), or enables the temporary memorization of relevant events at an intermediate time scale (seconds to minutes). In this study, we aimed to address the uncertainty around the timeframe of impact of awake replay by collecting causal evidence from behaving rats. We detected and disrupted sharp wave ripples (SWRs) - signatures of putative replay events - using electrical stimulation of the ventral hippocampal commissure in rats that were trained on three different spatial memory tasks. In each task, rats were required to memorize a new set of locations in each trial or each daily session. Interestingly, the rats performed equally well with or without SWR disruptions. These data suggest that awake SWRs - and potentially replay - does not affect the immediate behavior nor the temporary memorization of relevant events at a short timescale that are required to successfully perform the spatial tasks. Based on these results we hypothesize that the impact of awake replay on memory and behavior is long-term and cumulative over time.

Data availability

Falcon software for closed-loop ripple detection and code for analysis are publicly available at http://www.bitbucket.org/kloostermannerflab. Source data are deposited in the following Figshare repository: https://figshare.com/s/4c0fcdad7e4890d7ba93.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lies Deceuninck

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    lies.deceuninck@nerf.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Fabian Kloosterman

    Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    kloosterman.fabian@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6680-9660

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (PhD fellowship 11D9322N)

  • Lies Deceuninck

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (project grant G077321N)

  • Fabian Kloosterman

KU Leuven (grant C14/17/042)

  • Fabian Kloosterman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Liset M de la Prida, Instituto Cajal, Spain

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were carried out in accordance with protocols approved by KU Leuven animal ethics committee (P119/2015 and P175/2020) and in accordance with the European Council Directive, 2010/63/EU.

Version history

  1. Received: October 6, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: November 3, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: March 25, 2024
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 26, 2024 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: April 15, 2024 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2024, Deceuninck & Kloosterman

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 766
    views
  • 120
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lies Deceuninck
  2. Fabian Kloosterman
(2024)
Disruption of awake sharp-wave ripples does not affect memorization of locations in repeated-acquisition spatial memory tasks
eLife 13:e84004.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84004

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84004

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ya-Hui Lin, Li-Wen Wang ... Li-An Chu
    Research Article

    Tissue-clearing and labeling techniques have revolutionized brain-wide imaging and analysis, yet their application to clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks remains challenging. We introduce HIF-Clear, a novel method for efficiently clearing and labeling centimeter-thick FFPE specimens using elevated temperature and concentrated detergents. HIF-Clear with multi-round immunolabeling reveals neuron circuitry regulating multiple neurotransmitter systems in a whole FFPE mouse brain and is able to be used as the evaluation of disease treatment efficiency. HIF-Clear also supports expansion microscopy and can be performed on a non-sectioned 15-year-old FFPE specimen, as well as a 3-month formalin-fixed mouse brain. Thus, HIF-Clear represents a feasible approach for researching archived FFPE specimens for future neuroscientific and 3D neuropathological analyses.

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Article

    Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that - in addition to jumping, and rearing - is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing - all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveal a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.