Absence of electron-transfer-associated changes in the time-dependent X-ray free-electron laser structures of the photosynthetic reaction center

Version of Record

The authors declare this version of their article to be the Version of Record.

Download
Cite
Share
CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).

Version of Record published: October 5, 2023 (This version)
Reviewed preprint version 3: September 4, 2023 (Go to version)
Reviewed preprint version 2: August 8, 2023 (Go to version)
Reviewed preprint version 1: July 14, 2023 (Go to version)
Preprint posted: June 3, 2023 (Go to version)
Sent for peer review: May 14, 2023

1. Of interest
The substrate-binding domains of the osmoregulatory ABC importer OpuA transiently interact

Marco van den Noort, Panagiotis Drougkas ... Bert Poolman

Research Article May 2, 2024
Further reading

Abstract
eLife assessment
Introduction
Results and discussion
Methods
Data availability
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Using the X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) structures of the photosynthetic reaction center from Blastochloris viridis that show light-induced time-dependent structural changes (Dods et al., (2021) Nature 589, 310–314), we investigated time-dependent changes in the energetics of the electron-transfer pathway, considering the entire protein environment of the protein structures and titrating the redox-active sites in the presence of all fully equilibrated titratable residues. In the dark and charge separation intermediate structures, the calculated redox potential (E_m) values for the accessory bacteriochlorophyll and bacteriopheophytin in the electron-transfer-active branch (B_L and H_L) are higher than those in the electron-transfer-inactive branch (B_M and H_M). However, the stabilization of the charge-separated [P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– state owing to protein reorganization is not clearly observed in the E_m(H_L) values in the charge-separated 5 ps ([P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– state) structure. Furthermore, the expected chlorin ring deformation upon formation of H_L^•^– (saddling mode) is absent in the H_L geometry of the original 5 ps structure. These findings suggest that there is no clear link between the time-dependent structural changes and the electron-transfer events in the XFEL structures.

eLife assessment

The manuscript describes valuable theoretical calculations focusing on the structural changes in the photosynthetic reaction center postulated by others based on time-resolved crystallography using XFEL (Dods et al., Nature, 2021). The authors provide solid arguments that calculated changes in redox potential E_m and deformations using the XEFL structures may reflect experimental errors or data processing artifacts rather than real structural changes.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88955.4.sa0

About eLife assessments

Introduction

Photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRC) are heterodimeric reaction centers, which are formed by the protein subunits L and M (Figure 1). In PbRC from Blastochloris viridis, the electronic excitation of the bacteriochlorophyll b (BChlb) pair, [P_LP_M], leads to electron transfer to accessory BChlb, B_L, followed by electron transfer via bacteriopheophytin b (BPheob), H_L, to menaquinone, Q_A, along the electron-transfer active L-branch (A-branch) (Deisenhofer et al., 1985). Electron transfer further proceeds from Q_A to ubiquinone, Q_B, which is coupled with proton transfer via charged and polar residues in the Q_B binding region (Rabenstein et al., 1998). Although the counterpart M-branch (B-branch) is essentially electron-transfer inactive, mutations of the Phe-L181/Tyr-M208 pair to tyrosine/phenylalanine lead to an increase in the yield of [P_LP_M]^•⁺H_M^•^– formation (~30%), which suggests that these residues are responsible for the energetic asymmetry in the electron-transfer branches (e.g., Kirmaier et al., 2003). The anionic states B_L^•^–, H_L^•^–, and Q_A^•^– form in ~3.5 ps, ~5 ps, and ~200 ps upon the formation of the electronically excited [P_LP_M]* state, respectively (Holzapfel et al., 1990). The anionic state formation induces not only reoriganization of the protein environment (Marcus and Sutin, 1985) but also out-of-plane distortion of the chlorin ring (Saito et al., 2012). Two distinct conformations of H_L^•^– were reported in spectroscopic studies of PbRC from Rhodobacter sphaeroides (Müh et al., 1998).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Electron-transfer pathways along the L- and M-branches in PbRC from *B. viridis*.

The PbRC is composed of the L (red), M (blue), H (gold), and C (yellow) subunits. [P_LP_M]: BChlb pair; B_L and B_M: accessory BChlb; H_L and H_M: BPheob; Q_A: primary quinone (menaquinone); Fe: non-heme Fe complex.

Recently, using the X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL), light-induced electron density changes and structural changes of PbRC were analyzed at 1 ps, 5 ps, 20 ps, 300 ps, and 8 μs upon the electronic excitation of [P_LP_M] at 960 nm (Dods et al., 2021): the 1 ps XFEL structure represents the [P_LP_M]* state, the 5 ps and 20 ps XFEL structures represent the charge-separated [P_LP_M]^•⁺H_L^•^– state, and the 300 ps and 8 μs XFEL structures represent the charge-separated [P_LP_M]^•⁺Q_A^•^– state. According to Dods et al., 2021, these XFEL structures revealed how the charge separation process was stabilized by protein conformational dynamics. However, the conclusions drawn from these XFEL structures are based on data with limited resolution. Specifically, eight out of nine XFEL structures have a relatively low resolution of 2.8 Å (atomic coordinates from PDB codes: 5O4C, 6ZI4, and 6ZI5 for dataset a and 6ZHW, 6ZID, 6ZI6, 6ZI9, and 6ZIA for dataset b) (Dods et al., 2021). In addition, the data statistics may indicate that the high-resolution range of some XFEL datasets exhibits high levels of noise (e.g., low CC_1/2). These observations raise concerns about the reliable comparison of subtle conformational changes among these XFEL structures. Hence, caution must be exercised when interpreting these XFEL structures in terms of their ability to accurately capture relevant conformational changes.

Here, we investigated how the redox potential (E_m) values of the BChlb and BPheob cofactors for one-electron reduction change as electron transfer proceeds using the dark (0 ps), 1 ps, 5 ps, 20 ps, 300 ps, and 8 μs XFEL structures, solving the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation, and considering the protonation states of all titratable sites in the entire protein. Structural changes (e.g., side-chain reorientation) in the protein environment can be analyzed in the E_m shift, as E_m is predominantly determined by the sum of the electrostatic interactions between the redox-active site and all other groups (i.e., residues and cofactors) in the protein structure. Subtle structural changes of the BChlb and BPheob chlorin rings, which may not be pronounced even in the E_m shift (Saito et al., 2012), can be analyzed in the out-of-plane distortion of the chlorin rings using a normal-coordinate structural decomposition (NSD) analysis (Jentzen et al., 1997; Shelnutt et al., 1998) with a combination of a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach in the entire PbRC protein environment.

Results and discussion

Energetically asymmetric electron-transfer branches

The XFEL structures show that the E_m values for B_L are ~50 mV higher than those for B_M, which facilitates the formation of the charge-separated [P_LP_M]^•+B_L^•^– state and thereby electron transfer along the L-branch (Figures 2 and 3). As the E_m profile is substantially consistent with the E_m profile for PbRC from R. sphaeroides (Kawashima and Ishikita, 2018), it seems plausible that the charge-separated [P_LP_M]^•+B_L^•^– and [P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– states in the active L-branch are energetically lower than the [P_LP_M]^•+B_M^•^– and [P_LP_M]^•+H_M^•^– states in the inactive M-branch, respectively, as demonstrated in QM/MM calculations (Tamura et al., 2020). Indeed, the calculated E_m values are largely correlated with the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) levels calculated using a QM/MM approach, as suggested previously (coefficient of determination R²=0.98, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). The E_m(H_L) value of –597 mV (in dataset a; –598 mV in dataset b) is in line with the experimentally estimated value of ca. –600 mV for H_L in PbRC from B. viridis (Rutherford et al., 1979).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

E_m profiles in the XFEL structures for dataset a.

(a) 0 ps. (b) 5 ps. (c) 300 ps.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

E_m profiles in the XFEL structures for dataset b.

(a) 0 ps. (b) 1 ps. (c) 5 ps. (d) 20 ps. (e) 300 ps. (f) 8 μs.

Among the L/M residue pairs, the Phe-L181/Tyr-M208 pair contributes to E_m(B_L)>E_m(B_M) most significantly (25 mV), facilitating L-branch electron transfer, as suggested in theoretical studies (Gunner et al., 1996; Table 1, Figure 2; Figure 3; Figure 4). This result is also consistent with the contribution of the Phe-L181/Tyr-M210 pair to the difference between E_m(B_L) and E_m(B_M), which was the largest in PbRC from R. sphaeroides (Parson et al., 1990) (26 mV; Kawashima and Ishikita, 2018). The Asn-L158/Thr-M185 pair also contributes to the difference between E_m(B_L) and E_m(B_M) (12 mV, Table 1), as does the Val-L157/Thr-M186 pair in PbRC from R. sphaeroides (22 mV; Kawashima and Ishikita, 2018).

Table 1

Contributions of the L/M residue pairs that are responsible for E_m(B_L)>E_m(B_M) (more than 10 mV) in the dark-state structure (mV).

Difference: [contribution of subunit L to E_m(B_L)] + [contribution of subunit M to E_m(B_L)] – [contribution of subunit L to E_m(B_M)] – [contribution of subunit M to E_m(B_M)].

Subunit L	E_m(B_L)	E_m(B_M)	Subunit M	E_m(B_L)	E_m(B_M)	Difference
Phe-L181	0	17	Tyr-M208	39	–3	25
His-L144	–8	–2	Glu-M171	–14	–45	25
Asn-L158	5	–6	Thr-M185	–3	–4	12

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Residue pairs that are responsible for E_m(B_L)>E_m(B_M).

For dataset b, the E_m values for H_L are >50 mV higher than those for H_M , as observed in E_m(B_L) and E_m(B_M) (Figure 3). However, the E_m difference decreases to ~30 mV in the 8 μs XFEL structure (Figure 3f), which implies that the 8 μs XFEL structure is distinct from the other XFEL structures (see below). Below, we discuss the dark-state structure if not otherwise specified.

The Ala-L120/Asn-M147 pair contributes to E_m(H_L)>E_m(H_M) most significantly (38 mV) (Table 2, Figure 5). However, this holds true only for PbRC from B. viridis, as Asn-M147 is replaced with alanine (Ala-M149) in PbRC from R. sphaeroides. The Asp-L218/Trp-M252 pair decreases E_m(H_M) with respect to E_m(H_L), thereby contributing to E_m(H_L)>E_m(H_M) (20 mV) (Table 2; Figure 5). Arg-L103 orients toward the protein interior, whereas Arg-M130 orients toward the protein exterior (Figure 5), which contributes to E_m(H_L)>E_m(H_M) (17 mV) (Table 2). Ser-M271 forms an H-bond with Asn-M147 near H_M (Figure 5). Thus, the contribution of Ser-M271 to E_m(H_L) is large, although this residue is replaced with alanine (Ala-M273) in PbRC from R. sphaeroides.

Table 2

Contributions of the L/M residue pairs that are responsible for E_m(H_L)>E_m(H_M) (more than 10 mV) in the dark-state structure (mV).

Difference: [contribution of subunit L to E_m(H_L)] + [contribution of subunit M to E_m(H_L)] – [contribution of subunit L to E_m(H_M)] – [contribution of subunit M to E_m(H_M)].

Subunit L	E_m(H_L)	E_m(H_M)	Subunit M	E_m(H_L)	E_m(H_M)	Difference
Ala-L120	–4	0	Asn-M147	0	–42	38
Asp-L218	–2	–22	Trp-M252	1	0	20
Arg-L103	77	3	Arg-M130	3	59	17
Ala-L237	–2	0	Ser-M271	3	–16	16
Lys-L110	17	2	Ala-M137	0	3	14
Val-L219	1	5	Thr-M253	17	1	11
His-L211	1	0	Arg-M245	14	4	11

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Residue pairs that are responsible for E_m(H_L)>E_m(H_M).

Relevance of structural changes observed in XFEL structures

According to Dods et al., the 5 ps and 20 ps structures correspond to the charge-separated [P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– state (Dods et al., 2021). If this is the case, E_m(H_L) is expected to be exclusively higher in the 5 ps and 20 ps structures than in the other XFEL structures due to the stabilization of the [P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– state by protein reorganization. In dataset a, the E_m(H_L) value is only 4 mV higher in the 5 ps structure than in the dark structure (Figure 6a). In dataset b, the E_m(H_L) value is ~20 mV higher in the 5 ps and 20 ps structures than in the dark structure (Figure 6b). However, the E_m(H_L) value is 25 mV higher in the 300 ps structure than in the dark structure. Tables 3 and 4 show the residues that contribute to the slight increase in E_m(H_L) most significantly in the 5 ps and 20 ps structures. Most of these residues were in the region where Dods et al. specifically performed multiple rounds of partial occupancy refinement (e.g., 153–178, 190, 230, and 236–248 of subunit L and 193–221, 232, 243–253, 257–266 of subunit M) (Dods et al., 2021). In dataset b (Table 4), which has more data points than dataset a (Table 3), the contributions of these residues to E_m(H_L) often fluctuate (e.g., upshift/downshift followed by downshift/upshift) at different time intervals (e.g., 1–5 ps, 5–20 ps, and 20–300 ps). This result suggests that the structural differences among the XFEL structures are not related to the actual time course of charge separation. Furthermore, the E_m(H_M) value in the inactive M-branch is also ~15 mV higher in the 5 ps and 20 ps structures than in the dark structure (Figure 6b). These results suggest that the ~20 mV higher E_m(H_L) value in the 5 ps and 20 ps structures is not specifically due to the formation of the [P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– state. Thus, the stabilization of the [P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– state owing to protein reorganization is not clearly observed in the E_m(H_L) values.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Time-dependent E_m changes for BChlb and BPheob in the XFEL structures.

(a) Dataset a. (b) Dataset b. ΔE_m denotes the E_m shift with respect to the dark-state structure. Black solid lines: P_L; black dotted lines: P_M; blue solid lines B_L; blue dotted lines: B_M; red solid lines: H_L; red dotted lines: H_M.

Figure 6—source data 1 Numerical source data for Figure 6.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88955/elife-88955-fig6-data1-v1.zip
Download elife-88955-fig6-data1-v1.zip

Table 3

Residues that shift E_m(H_L) most significantly during putative electron transfer in the XFEL structures (dataset a) (mV).

The same residues are highlighted in the same colors for clarity.

Dataset a		Shift		Shift
0–5 ps	Ser-L176	5	Cys-M210	4
	Thr-M220	–7	B_L	–5

5–300 ps	B_L	7	Gly-M209	3
	Gly-M211	–11	Leu-M212	–8

Table 4

Residues that shift E_m(H_L) most significantly during putative electron transfer in the XFEL structures (dataset b) (mV).

The same residues are highlighted in the same colors for clarity.

Dataset b		Shift		Shift
0–1 ps	Ser-L238	8	Ser-L176	7
	B_L	–7	Leu-M213	–3

1–5 ps	Gly-M211	6	Leu-M213	5
	Ser-L238	–6	Thr-M253	–5

5–20 ps	B_L	12	Thr-M253	7
	Leu-M213	–4	P_M	–3

20–300 ps	Ser-L238	3	Gly-M211	2
	B_L	–10	Glu-L212	–4

300 ps to 8 μs	Glu-L212	4	Leu-M213	4
	B_L	–6	Gly-M211	–5

An NSD analysis (Jentzen et al., 1997; Shelnutt et al., 1998) of the out-of-plane distortion of the chlorin ring is sensitive to subtle structural changes in the chlorin ring, which are not distinct in the E_m changes (Saito et al., 2012). QM/MM calculations indicate that H_L^•^– formation induces the saddling mode in the chlorin ring, which describes the movement of rings I and III being in the opposite direction to the movement of rings II and IV along the normal axis of the chlorin ring (Tables 5 and 6). However, (i) in the XFEL structures, the saddling mode of H_L remains practically unchanged in dataset a during electron transfer (Figure 7 and Supplementary files 1 and 2). In dataset b, the saddling mode of H_L is induced most significantly at 1 ps, which does not correspond to the charge-separated [P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– state (Figure 8). (ii) In addition, the ruffling mode is more pronounced than the saddling mode in H_L (Figure 8), which suggests that the observed deformation of H_L is not directly associated with the reduction of H_L.

Table 5

Induced out-of-plane distortion of H_L and H_M in the PbRC protein environment of the dark structure for dataset a in response to the reduction (Å).

	Saddling	Ruffling	Doming	Waving		Propellering
	B_2u	B_1u	A_2u	E_g(x)	E_g(y)	A_1u
H_L	0.18	0.35	–0.10	0.13	–0.11	0.13
H_L^•^–	0.24	0.35	–0.09	0.12	–0.12	0.13
(P_L^•+H_L^•^–)	(0.22)	(0.36)	(–0.07)	(0.13)	(–0.13)	(0.13)
H_L/H_L^•^– difference	0.06	0.00	0.01	–0.01	–0.01	0.00

H_M	0.06	0.40	–0.20	0.37	0.12	0.19
H_M^•^–	0.12	0.38	–0.22	0.33	0.09	0.22
(P_L^•+H_M^•^–)	(0.14)	(0.38)	(–0.22)	(0.33)	(0.10)	(0.22)
H_M/H_M^•^– difference	0.06	–0.02	–0.02	–0.04	–0.03	0.03

Table 5—source data 1 Numerical source data for Table 5.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88955/elife-88955-table5-data1-v1.zip
Download elife-88955-table5-data1-v1.zip

Table 6

Induced out-of-plane distortion of H_L and H_M in the PbRC protein environment of the dark structure for dataset b in response to the reduction (Å).

	Saddling	Ruffling	Doming	Waving		Propellering
	B_2u	B_1u	A_2u	E_g(x)	E_g(y)	A_1u
H_L	0.13	0.35	–0.13	0.07	–0.09	0.20
H_L^•^–	0.25	0.34	–0.02	0.12	–0.16	0.13
(P_L^•+H_L^•^–)	(0.23)	(0.34)	(–0.03)	(0.12)	(–0.16)	(0.12)
H_L/H_L^•^– difference	0.12	–0.01	0.11	0.05	–0.07	–0.07
H_M	0.08	0.57	–0.11	0.16	0.20	0.32
H_M^•^–	0.16	0.36	–0.19	0.36	0.18	0.21
(P_L^•+H_M^•^–)	(0.16)	(0.36)	(–0.20)	(0.36)	(0.18)	(0.21)
H_M/H_M^•^– difference	0.08	–0.21	–0.08	0.20	–0.02	–0.11

Table 6—source data 1 Numerical source data for Table 6.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88955/elife-88955-table6-data1-v1.zip
Download elife-88955-table6-data1-v1.zip

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

Time-dependent changes in the lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings in the XFEL structures (dataset a). (a) P_L. (b) P_M. (c) B_L. (d) B_M. (e) H_L. (f) H_M. (g) Typical lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings.

Sad: saddling (red); ruf: ruffling (blue); dom: doming (green); wav(x, y): waving (x, y) (gray, dark blue); pro: propellering (orange). Solid and dotted lines indicate L- and M-branches, respectively. See Supplementary file 1 for the absolute values in the dark state for dataset a.

Figure 7—source data 1 Numerical source data for Figure 7.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88955/elife-88955-fig7-data1-v1.zip
Download elife-88955-fig7-data1-v1.zip

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Time-dependent changes in the lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings in the XFEL structures (dataset b). (a) P_L. (b) P_M. (c) B_L. (d) B_M. (e) H_L. (f) H_M.

Sad: saddling (red); ruf: ruffling (blue); dom: doming (green); wav(x, y): waving (x, y) (gray, dark blue); pro: propellering (orange). Solid and dotted lines indicate L- and M-branches, respectively. See Supplementary file 2 for the absolute values in the dark state for dataset b Figure 8—source data 1.

Figure 8—source data 1 Numerical source data for Figure 8.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88955/elife-88955-fig8-data1-v1.zip
Download elife-88955-fig8-data1-v1.zip

One might argue that the loss of the link between the formation of the charge-separated state and the E_m(H_L) change (Figure 6) is not due to experimental errors, including data processing artifacts, but rather represents the actual ps timescale phenomena during the primary charge-separation reactions (e.g., Dods et al. noted that ‘the primary electron-transfer step to H_L is more rapid than conventional Marcus theory’; Dods et al., 2021). Even if this were the case, this hypothesis regarding the relevance of the XFEL structures to the electron-transfer events could be further explored by examining the changes in E_m(Q_A) among the XFEL structures, considering the relatively slow electron-transfer step to Q_A that allows sufficient protein relaxation to occur (e.g., Dods et al. stated that ‘the electron-transfer step to Q_A has a single exponential decay time of 230±30 ps, consistent with conventional Marcus theory’; Dods et al., 2021). That is, if the E_m(Q_A) values are not higher in the 300 ps and 8 μs structures than in the other structures, it suggests that significant experimental errors exist, rendering the XFEL structures irrelevant to the electron-transfer events. Consistent with this perspective, the present results demonstrate that the E_m(Q_A) values in the 300 ps and 8 μs structures are not significantly higher than those in the other structures, including the dark-state structure (Figure 9). Consequently, the lack of a clear relationship between the charge-separated state and the changes in E_m(Q_A) at 300 ps and 8 μs further strengthens the argument that the XFEL structures are irrelevant to the electron-transfer events.

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

Time-dependent E_m changes for Q_A in the XFEL structures.

(a) Dataset a. (b) Dataset b. ΔE_m denotes the E_m shift with respect to the dark-state structure. Note that the calculated E_m(Q_A) values for dataset a and dataset b in the dark structure are –223 mV and –209 mV, respectively, which are comparable to experimentally measured values of –150 mV for PbRC from *B. viridis* (menaquinone) (Prince et al., 1976) and –180 mV for PbRC from *R. sphaeroides* (ubiquinone) (Prince and Dutton, 1976).

Figure 9—source data 1 Numerical source data for Figure 9.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88955/elife-88955-fig9-data1-v1.zip
Download elife-88955-fig9-data1-v1.zip

In summary, the E_m values in the active L-branch are higher than those in the inactive M-branch in the XFEL structures, which suggests that electron transfer via B_L^•^– and H_L^•^– is energetically more favored than that via B_M^•^– and H_M^•^– (Figure 2). The Phe-L181/Tyr-M208 pair contributes to the difference between E_m(B_L) and E_m(B_M) the most significantly, as observed in the Phe-L181/Tyr-M210 pair in PbRC from R. sphaeroides (Kawashima and Ishikita, 2018; Parson et al., 1990). The stabilization of the [P_LP_M]^•+H_L^•^– state owing to protein reorganization is not clearly observed in the E_m(H_L) values (Figure 6). The absence of the induced saddling mode in the H_L chlorin ring in the 5 ps and 20 ps structures suggests that H_L^•^– does not specifically exist in these XFEL structures (Figures 7 and 8). The cyclic fluctuations in the contributions of the residues to E_m(H_L) at different time intervals suggest that the structural differences among the XFEL structures are not related to the actual time course of charge separation (Table 4). The major limitation of the structural studies conducted by Dods et al., 2021, is the relatively low resolution of their XFEL structures, primarily at 2.8 Å. Consequently, the observed changes in E_m values and chlorin ring deformations are more likely to reflect experimental errors or data processing artifacts rather than actual structural changes induced by electron-transfer events. This concern is reinforced by the lack of a clear relationship between the actual Q_A^•^– formation and the E_m(Q_A) values in the 300 ps and 8 μs structures (Figure 9). Consequently, the time-dependent structural changes proposed by Dods et al., 2021, are highly likely irrelevant to the electron-transfer events.

Hence, it is crucial to exercise caution when interpreting time-dependent XFEL structures, especially in the absence of comprehensive evaluations of the energetics for accompanying structural changes. This cautionary note should serve as a counterargument in the future, highlighting the potential pitfalls associated with presenting time-dependent XFEL structures of insufficient quality and drawing conclusive interpretations of protein structural changes that may not be distinguishable from significant experimental errors or data processing artifacts. Future high-resolution structures may provide further insights into the actual structural changes relevant to electron-transfer events. By combining both high-resolution structures and rigorous energetic evaluations, a more comprehensive understanding of the protein structure-function relationship can be achieved.

Methods

Coordinates and atomic partial charges

The atomic coordinates of PbRC from B. viridis were taken from the XFEL structures determined at 0 ps (dark state; PDB code 5O4C for dataset a and 5NJ4 for dataset b), 1 ps ([P_LP_M]* state; PDB code, 6ZHW for dataset b), 5 ps ([P_LP_M] ^•+H_L^•^– state; PDB code, 6ZI4 for dataset a and 6ZID for dataset b), 20 ps ([P_LP_M] ^•+H_L^•^– state; PDB code, 6ZI6 for dataset b), 300 ps ([P_LP_M] ^•+Q_A^•^– state; PDB code, 6ZI5 for dataset a and 6ZI9 for dataset b), and 8 μs ([P_LP_M] ^•+Q_A^•^– state; PDB code, 6ZIA for dataset b). Atoms with 30% occupancy for the photoactivated state (Dods et al., 2021) were used wherever present. Hydrogen atoms were generated and energetically optimized with CHARMM (Brooks et al., 1983). The atomic partial charges of the amino acids were obtained from the all-atom CHARMM22 (MacKerell et al., 1998) parameter set. For diacylglycerol, the Fe complex (Kawashima and Ishikita, 2018), and menaquinone (Kawashima and Ishikita, 2017), the atomic charges were adopted from previous studies. The atomic charges of BChlb and BPheob (BChlb, BChlb^•+, BChlb^•–, BPheob, and BPheob^•–) were determined by fitting the electrostatic potential in the neighborhood of these molecules using the RESP procedure (Bayly et al., 1993; Supplementary file 3). The electronic densities were calculated after geometry optimization using the density functional theory (DFT) method with the B3LYP functional and 6-31G** basis sets in the JAGUAR program (Jaguar, 2012). For the atomic charges of the nonpolar CH_n groups in the cofactors (e.g., the phytol chains of BChlb and BPheob and the isoprene side chains of quinone), a value of +0.09 was assigned to nonpolar H atoms.

Calculation of E_m: solving the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation

The E_m values in the protein were determined by calculating the electrostatic energy difference between the two redox states in a reference model system. This was achieved by solving the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation with the MEAD program (Bashford and Karplus, 1990) and using E_m(BChlb) = –665 mV and E_m(BPheob) = –429 mV (based on E_m(BChlb) = –700 mV and E_m(BPheob) = –500 mV for one-electron reduction measured in dimethylformamide; Fajer et al., 1976; Watanabe and Kobayashi, 1991), considering the solvation energy difference. The E_m(Q_A) value was calculated, using the reference E_m value of –256 mV versus NHE for menaquinone-2 in water (Kishi et al., 2017). The difference in the E_m value of the protein relative to the reference system was added to the known E_m value. To account for the ensemble of protonation patterns, a Monte Carlo method with Karlsberg was used for sampling (Rabenstein and Knapp, 2001). The linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation was solved using a three-step grid-focusing procedure with resolutions of 2.5 Å, 1.0 Å, and 0.3 Å. Monte Carlo sampling provided the probabilities [A_ox] and [A_red] of the two redox states of molecule A, and E_m was evaluated using the Nernst equation. A bias potential was applied to ensure an equal amount of both redox states ([A_ox] = [A_red]), thus determining the redox midpoint potential as the resulting bias potential. To ensure consistency with previous computational results, we used identical computational conditions and parameters as previous studies (e.g., Kawashima and Ishikita, 2018), performing all computations at 300 K, pH 7.0, and an ionic strength of 100 mM. The dielectric constants were set to 4 for the protein interior and 80 for water.

QM/MM calculations

We employed the restricted DFT method for describing the closed-shell electronic structure and the unrestricted DFT method for the open-shell electronic structure with the B3LYP functional and LACVP* basis sets using the QSite (QSite, 2012) program. To neutralize the entire system, counter ions were added randomly around the protein using the Autoionize plugin in VMD (Humphrey et al., 1996). In the QM region, all atom positions were relaxed in the QM region, while the H-atom positions were relaxed in the MM region. The QM regions were defined as follows: for the BChlb pair [P_LP_M]: the side chains of the ligand residues (His-L173 and His-M200) and H-bond partners (His-L168, Tyr-M195, and Thr-L248); for accessory BChlb: B_L/B_M and the side chain of the ligand residue (His-L153 for B_L/His-M180 for B_M); for BPheob: H_L/H_M.

NSD analysis

To analyze the out-of-plane distortions of chlorin rings, we employed an NSD procedure with the minimal basis approximation, where the deformation profile can be represented by the six lowest-frequency normal modes, that is, ruffling (B_1u), saddling (B_2u), doming (A_2u), waving (E_g(x) and E_g(y)), and propellering (A_1u) modes (Jentzen et al., 1997; Shelnutt et al., 1998). The NSD analysis was performed in the following three steps, as performed previously (Saito et al., 2012). First, the atomic coordinates of the Mg-substituted macrocycle were extracted from the crystal or QM/MM optimized structures (Table 5—source data 1, Table 6—source data 1). Second, the extracted coordinates were superimposed on the reference coordinates of the macrocycle. The superimposition is based on a least-square method, and the mathematical procedure is described in Zucchelli et al., 2007. Finally, the out-of-plane distortion in the superimposed coordinates was decomposed into the six lowest-frequency normal modes by the projection to the reference normal mode coordinates as

d^{Γ} = \sum_{i = 1}^{N} Δ z_{i} {(n_{z}^{Γ})}_{i},

where $d^{Γ}$ represents the distortion component of the mode Γ (i.e., Γ = B_1u, B_2u, A_2u, E_g(x), E_g(y), or A_1u), $Δ z_{i}$ is the z-component of the superimposed coordinates in the ith heavy atom, and ${(n_{z}^{Γ})}_{i}$ is the z-component of the normalized eigenvector of the reference normal mode Γ in the ith heavy atom. N represents the number of heavy atoms. See Saito et al., 2012, for further details.

Data availability

Figure 2 - figure supplement 1 - source data 1, Figure 6 - source data 1, Figure 7 - source data 1, Figure 8 - source data 1, Figure 9 - source data 1, Table 5 - source data 1, and Table 6 - source data 1 contain the numerical data used to generate the figures and tables.

References

1. Bashford D
2. Karplus M
(1990) pK_a’s of ionizable groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model
Biochemistry 29:10219–10225.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00496a010
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1993) A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model
The Journal of Physical Chemistry 97:10269–10280.
https://doi.org/10.1021/j100142a004
- Google Scholar
(1983) CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations
Journal of Computational Chemistry 4:187–217.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540040211
- Google Scholar
1. Deisenhofer J
2. Epp O
3. Miki K
4. Huber R
5. Michel H
(1985) Structure of the protein subunits in the photosynthetic reaction centre of Rhodopseudomonas viridis at 3Å resolution
Nature 318:618–624.
https://doi.org/10.1038/318618a0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Dods R
2. Båth P
3. Morozov D
4. Gagnér VA
5. Arnlund D
6. Luk HL
7. Kübel J
8. Maj M
9. Vallejos A
10. Wickstrand C
11. Bosman R
12. Beyerlein KR
13. Nelson G
14. Liang M
15. Milathianaki D
16. Robinson J
17. Harimoorthy R
18. Berntsen P
19. Malmerberg E
20. Johansson L
21. Andersson R
22. Carbajo S
23. Claesson E
24. Conrad CE
25. Dahl P
26. Hammarin G
27. Hunter MS
28. Li C
29. Lisova S
30. Royant A
31. Safari C
32. Sharma A
33. Williams GJ
34. Yefanov O
35. Westenhoff S
36. Davidsson J
37. DePonte DP
38. Boutet S
39. Barty A
40. Katona G
41. Groenhof G
42. Brändén G
43. Neutze R
(2021) Ultrafast structural changes within a photosynthetic reaction centre
Nature 589:310–314.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3000-7
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Fajer J
2. Davis MS
3. Brune DC
4. Spaulding LD
5. Forman A
(1976)
Chlorophyll radicals and primary events

Brookhaven symposia in biology 28:74.
- Google Scholar
(1996) Electrostatic potentials in Rhodopseudomonas viridis reaction centers: implications for the driving force and directionality of electron transfer
The Journal of Physical Chemistry 100:4277–4291.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9519070
- Google Scholar
1. Holzapfel W
2. Finkele U
3. Kaiser W
4. Oesterhelt D
5. Scheer H
6. Stilz HU
7. Zinth W
(1990) Initial electron-transfer in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides
PNAS 87:5168–5172.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.13.5168
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Journal of Molecular Graphics 14:33–38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Jaguar
(2012)
Schrödinger, LLC

Version 7.9.
(1997) Structural characterization of synthetic and protein-bound porphyrins in terms of the lowest-frequency normal coordinates of the macrocycle
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 101:1684–1699.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp963142h
- Google Scholar
1. Kawashima K
2. Ishikita H
(2017) Structural factors that alter the redox potential of quinones in cyanobacterial and plant photosystem I
Biochemistry 56:3019–3028.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00082
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kawashima K
2. Ishikita H
(2018) Energetic insights into two electron transfer pathways in light-driven energy-converting enzymes
Chemical Science 9:4083–4092.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sc00424b
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) B-side charge separation in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: nanosecond time scale electron transfer from H_B^– to Q_B
Biochemistry 42:2016–2024.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi026973o
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kishi S
2. Saito K
3. Kato Y
4. Ishikita H
(2017) Redox potentials of ubiquinone, menaquinone, phylloquinone, and plastoquinone in aqueous solution
Photosynthesis Research 134:193–200.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-017-0433-4
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. MacKerell AD
2. Bashford D
3. Bellott M
4. Dunbrack RL
5. Evanseck JD
6. Field MJ
7. Fischer S
8. Gao J
9. Guo H
10. Ha S
11. Joseph-McCarthy D
12. Kuchnir L
13. Kuczera K
14. Lau FT
15. Mattos C
16. Michnick S
17. Ngo T
18. Nguyen DT
19. Prodhom B
20. Reiher WE
21. Roux B
22. Schlenkrich M
23. Smith JC
24. Stote R
25. Straub J
26. Watanabe M
27. Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera J
28. Yin D
29. Karplus M
(1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins
The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 102:3586–3616.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp973084f
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Marcus RA
2. Sutin N
(1985) Electron transfers in chemistry and biology
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 811:265–322.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Müh F
2. Williams JC
3. Allen JP
4. Lubitz W
(1998) A conformational change of the photoactive bacteriopheophytin in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides
Biochemistry 37:13066–13074.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi980799f
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1990) Electrostatic control of charge separation in bacterial photosynthesis
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1017:251–272.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(90)90192-7
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Prince RC
2. Dutton PL
(1976) The primary acceptor of bacterial photosynthesis: Its operating midpoint potential?
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 172:329–334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(76)90084-9
- Google Scholar
(1976) Thermodynamic properties of the reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis in vivo measurement of the reaction center bacteriochlorophyll-primary acceptor intermediary electron carrier
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 440:622–636.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(76)90047-5
- Google Scholar
Software
1. QSite
(2012)
Schrödinger, LLC

Version 5.8.
(1998) Energetics of electron-transfer and protonation reactions of the quinones in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis
Biochemistry 37:2488–2495.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi971921y
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Rabenstein B
2. Knapp E-W
(2001) Calculated pH-dependent population and protonation of carbon-monoxy-myoglobin conformers
Biophysical Journal 80:1141–1150.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76091-2
- Google Scholar
(1979) Electron-paramagnetic-resonance measurements of the electron-transfer components of the reaction centre of Rhodopseudomonas viridis. Oxidation–reduction potentials and interactions of the electron acceptors
Biochemical Journal 182:515–523.
https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1820515
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Saito K
2. Umena Y
3. Kawakami K
4. Shen JR
5. Kamiya N
6. Ishikita H
(2012) Deformation of chlorin rings in the photosystem II crystal structure
Biochemistry 51:4290–4299.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi300428s
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Shelnutt JA
2. Song X-Z
3. Ma J-G
4. Jia S-L
5. Jentzen W
6. J. Medforth C
(1998) Nonplanar porphyrins and their significance in proteins
Chemical Society Reviews 27:31.
https://doi.org/10.1039/a827031z
- Google Scholar
(2020) Acquirement of water-splitting ability and alteration of the charge-separation mechanism in photosynthetic reaction centers
PNAS 117:16373–16382.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000895117
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Watanabe T
2. Kobayashi M
(1991)
Chlorophylls

In: Scheer H, editors. Electrochemistry of Chlorophylls. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 287–303.
- Google Scholar
(2007) Chlorophyll ring deformation modulates Qy electronic energy in chlorophyll-protein complexes and generates spectral forms
Biophysical Journal 93:2240–2254.
https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.104554
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

Gai Nishikawa

Department of Applied Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Contribution
Validation, Investigation

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Yu Sugo

Department of Applied Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Contribution
Methodology

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Keisuke Saito
1. Department of Applied Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
2. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Contribution
Investigation, Methodology

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2293-9743
Hiroshi Ishikita
1. Department of Applied Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
2. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Contribution
Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

For correspondence
hiro@appchem.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5849-8150

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP23H04963)

Keisuke Saito

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP20H03217)

Hiroshi Ishikita

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP23H02444)

Hiroshi Ishikita

University of Tsukuba (Interdisciplinary Computational Science Program in CCS)

Keisuke Saito

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (JP23H04963 to KS; JP20H03217 and JP23H02444 to HI) and Interdisciplinary Computational Science Program in CCS, University of Tsukuba.

Version history

Sent for peer review: May 14, 2023
Preprint posted: June 3, 2023 (view preprint)
Preprint posted: July 14, 2023 (view preprint)
Preprint posted: August 8, 2023 (view preprint)
Preprint posted: September 4, 2023 (view preprint)
Version of Record published: October 5, 2023 (version 1)

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88955. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

568

views
29

downloads
0

citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Mendeley

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Gai Nishikawa
Yu Sugo
Keisuke Saito
Hiroshi Ishikita

(2023)

Absence of electron-transfer-associated changes in the time-dependent X-ray free-electron laser structures of the photosynthetic reaction center

eLife 12:RP88955.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88955.4

Share this article

Cite this article

Electron-transfer pathways along the L- and M-branches in PbRC from B. viridis.

Em profiles in the XFEL structures for dataset a.

Em profiles in the XFEL structures for dataset b.

Contributions of the L/M residue pairs that are responsible for Em(BL)>Em(BM) (more than 10 mV) in the dark-state structure (mV).

Residue pairs that are responsible for Em(BL)>Em(BM).

Contributions of the L/M residue pairs that are responsible for Em(HL)>Em(HM) (more than 10 mV) in the dark-state structure (mV).

Residue pairs that are responsible for Em(HL)>Em(HM).

Time-dependent Em changes for BChlb and BPheob in the XFEL structures.

Figure 6—source data 1

Residues that shift Em(HL) most significantly during putative electron transfer in the XFEL structures (dataset a) (mV).

Residues that shift Em(HL) most significantly during putative electron transfer in the XFEL structures (dataset b) (mV).

Induced out-of-plane distortion of HL and HM in the PbRC protein environment of the dark structure for dataset a in response to the reduction (Å).

Table 5—source data 1

Induced out-of-plane distortion of HL and HM in the PbRC protein environment of the dark structure for dataset b in response to the reduction (Å).

Table 6—source data 1

Time-dependent changes in the lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings in the XFEL structures (dataset a). (a) PL. (b) PM. (c) BL. (d) BM. (e) HL. (f) HM. (g) Typical lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings.

Figure 7—source data 1

Time-dependent changes in the lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings in the XFEL structures (dataset b). (a) PL. (b) PM. (c) BL. (d) BM. (e) HL. (f) HM.

Figure 8—source data 1

Time-dependent Em changes for QA in the XFEL structures.

Figure 9—source data 1

Author details

Gai Nishikawa

Contribution

Competing interests

Yu Sugo

Contribution

Competing interests

Keisuke Saito

Contribution

Competing interests

Hiroshi Ishikita

Contribution

For correspondence

Competing interests

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Categories and tags

Further reading

E_m profiles in the XFEL structures for dataset a.

E_m profiles in the XFEL structures for dataset b.

Contributions of the L/M residue pairs that are responsible for E_m(B_L)>E_m(B_M) (more than 10 mV) in the dark-state structure (mV).

Residue pairs that are responsible for E_m(B_L)>E_m(B_M).

Contributions of the L/M residue pairs that are responsible for E_m(H_L)>E_m(H_M) (more than 10 mV) in the dark-state structure (mV).

Residue pairs that are responsible for E_m(H_L)>E_m(H_M).

Time-dependent E_m changes for BChlb and BPheob in the XFEL structures.

Residues that shift E_m(H_L) most significantly during putative electron transfer in the XFEL structures (dataset a) (mV).

Residues that shift E_m(H_L) most significantly during putative electron transfer in the XFEL structures (dataset b) (mV).

Induced out-of-plane distortion of H_L and H_M in the PbRC protein environment of the dark structure for dataset a in response to the reduction (Å).

Induced out-of-plane distortion of H_L and H_M in the PbRC protein environment of the dark structure for dataset b in response to the reduction (Å).

Time-dependent changes in the lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings in the XFEL structures (dataset a). (a) P_L. (b) P_M. (c) B_L. (d) B_M. (e) H_L. (f) H_M. (g) Typical lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings.

Time-dependent changes in the lowest frequency out-of-plane modes of the chlorin rings in the XFEL structures (dataset b). (a) P_L. (b) P_M. (c) B_L. (d) B_M. (e) H_L. (f) H_M.

Time-dependent E_m changes for Q_A in the XFEL structures.