T cell-intrinsic role of IL-6 signaling in primary and memory responses

  1. Simone A Nish
  2. Dominik Schenten
  3. Thomas Wunderlich
  4. Scott D Pope
  5. Yan Gao
  6. Namiko Hoshi
  7. Shuang Yu
  8. Xiting Yan
  9. Heung Kyu Lee
  10. Lesley Pasman
  11. Igor Brodsky
  12. Brian Yordy
  13. Hongyu Zhao
  14. Jens Brüning
  15. Ruslan Medzhitov  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research Cologne, Germany
  3. Yale School of Public Health, United States

Abstract

Innate immune recognition is critical for the induction of adaptive immune responses; however the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here, we demonstrate that T cell-specific deletion of the IL-6 receptor α chain (IL-6Rα) results in impaired Th1 and Th17 T cell responses in vivo, and a defect in the Tfh function. Depletion of Tregs in these mice rescued the Th1 but not the Th17 response. Our data suggest that IL-6 signaling in effector T cells is required to overcome Treg-mediated suppression in vivo. We show that IL-6 cooperates with IL-1β to block the suppressive effect of Tregs on CD4+ T cells, at least in part by controlling their responsiveness to IL-2. In addition, although IL-6Rα-deficient T cells mount normal primary Th1 responses in the absence of Tregs, they fail to mature into functional memory cells, demonstrating a key role for IL-6 in CD4+ T cell memory formation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Simone A Nish

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Dominik Schenten

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Thomas Wunderlich

    Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Scott D Pope

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Yan Gao

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Namiko Hoshi

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shuang Yu

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Xiting Yan

    Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Heung Kyu Lee

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Lesley Pasman

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Igor Brodsky

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Brian Yordy

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Hongyu Zhao

    Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Jens Brüning

    Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Ruslan Medzhitov

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    ruslan.medzhitov@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    Ruslan Medzhitov, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Tadatsugu Taniguchi, University of Tokyo, Japan

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#2011-08006) of the Yale University.

Version history

  1. Received: November 25, 2013
  2. Accepted: May 16, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 19, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 10, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Nish et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,826
    views
  • 935
    downloads
  • 113
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Simone A Nish
  2. Dominik Schenten
  3. Thomas Wunderlich
  4. Scott D Pope
  5. Yan Gao
  6. Namiko Hoshi
  7. Shuang Yu
  8. Xiting Yan
  9. Heung Kyu Lee
  10. Lesley Pasman
  11. Igor Brodsky
  12. Brian Yordy
  13. Hongyu Zhao
  14. Jens Brüning
  15. Ruslan Medzhitov
(2014)
T cell-intrinsic role of IL-6 signaling in primary and memory responses
eLife 3:e01949.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01949

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01949

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.