Mitochondrial fusion but not fission regulates larval growth and synaptic development through steroid hormone production

  1. Hector Sandoval
  2. Chi-Kuang Yao
  3. Kuchuan Chen
  4. Manish Jaiswal
  5. Taraka Donti
  6. Yong Qi Lin
  7. Vafa Bayat
  8. Bo Xiong
  9. Ke Zhang
  10. Gabriela David
  11. Wu-Lin Charng
  12. Yamamoto Shinya
  13. Lita Duraine
  14. Brett H Graham
  15. Hugo J Bellen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. Academia Sinica, Taiwan
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College Of Medicine, United States
  4. Stanford Hospital and Clinics, United States
  5. University of Washington, United States
  6. John Hopkins University, United States
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Mitochondrial fusion and fission affect the distribution and quality control of mitochondria. We show that Marf (Mitochondrial associated regulatory factor), is required for mitochondrial fusion and transport in long axons. Moreover, loss of Marf leads to a severe depletion of mitochondria in neuromuscular junctions (NMJs). Marf mutants also fail to maintain proper synaptic transmission at NMJs upon repetitive stimulation, similar to Drp1 fission mutants. However, unlike Drp1, loss of Marf leads to NMJ morphology defects and extended larval lifespan. Marf is required to form contacts between the endoplasmic reticulum and/or lipid droplets (LDs) and for proper storage of cholesterol and ecdysone synthesis in Ring Glands. Interestingly, human Mitofusin-2 rescues the loss of LD but both Mitofusin-1 and Mitofusin-2 are required for steroid-hormone synthesis. Our data show that Marf and Mitofusins share an evolutionarily conserved role in mitochondrial transport, cholesterol ester storage and steroid-hormone synthesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hector Sandoval

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chi-Kuang Yao

    Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kuchuan Chen

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Manish Jaiswal

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Taraka Donti

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yong Qi Lin

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College Of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Vafa Bayat

    Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Bo Xiong

    University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Ke Zhang

    John Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gabriela David

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wu-Lin Charng

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yamamoto Shinya

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Lita Duraine

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Brett H Graham

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Hugo J Bellen

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    hbellen@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard J Youle, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 2, 2014
  2. Accepted: October 13, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 14, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 3, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Sandoval et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,842
    views
  • 882
    downloads
  • 88
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hector Sandoval
  2. Chi-Kuang Yao
  3. Kuchuan Chen
  4. Manish Jaiswal
  5. Taraka Donti
  6. Yong Qi Lin
  7. Vafa Bayat
  8. Bo Xiong
  9. Ke Zhang
  10. Gabriela David
  11. Wu-Lin Charng
  12. Yamamoto Shinya
  13. Lita Duraine
  14. Brett H Graham
  15. Hugo J Bellen
(2014)
Mitochondrial fusion but not fission regulates larval growth and synaptic development through steroid hormone production
eLife 3:e03558.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03558

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03558

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Amandine Jarysta, Abigail LD Tadenev ... Basile Tarchini
    Research Article

    Inhibitory G alpha (GNAI or Gαi) proteins are critical for the polarized morphogenesis of sensory hair cells and for hearing. The extent and nature of their actual contributions remains unclear, however, as previous studies did not investigate all GNAI proteins and included non-physiological approaches. Pertussis toxin can downregulate functionally redundant GNAI1, GNAI2, GNAI3, and GNAO proteins, but may also induce unrelated defects. Here, we directly and systematically determine the role(s) of each individual GNAI protein in mouse auditory hair cells. GNAI2 and GNAI3 are similarly polarized at the hair cell apex with their binding partner G protein signaling modulator 2 (GPSM2), whereas GNAI1 and GNAO are not detected. In Gnai3 mutants, GNAI2 progressively fails to fully occupy the sub-cellular compartments where GNAI3 is missing. In contrast, GNAI3 can fully compensate for the loss of GNAI2 and is essential for hair bundle morphogenesis and auditory function. Simultaneous inactivation of Gnai2 and Gnai3 recapitulates for the first time two distinct types of defects only observed so far with pertussis toxin: (1) a delay or failure of the basal body to migrate off-center in prospective hair cells, and (2) a reversal in the orientation of some hair cell types. We conclude that GNAI proteins are critical for hair cells to break planar symmetry and to orient properly before GNAI2/3 regulate hair bundle morphogenesis with GPSM2.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang ... Zhiyuan Li
    Research Article

    Organisms utilize gene regulatory networks (GRN) to make fate decisions, but the regulatory mechanisms of transcription factors (TF) in GRNs are exceedingly intricate. A longstanding question in this field is how these tangled interactions synergistically contribute to decision-making procedures. To comprehensively understand the role of regulatory logic in cell fate decisions, we constructed a logic-incorporated GRN model and examined its behavior under two distinct driving forces (noise-driven and signal-driven). Under the noise-driven mode, we distilled the relationship among fate bias, regulatory logic, and noise profile. Under the signal-driven mode, we bridged regulatory logic and progression-accuracy trade-off, and uncovered distinctive trajectories of reprogramming influenced by logic motifs. In differentiation, we characterized a special logic-dependent priming stage by the solution landscape. Finally, we applied our findings to decipher three biological instances: hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, and trans-differentiation. Orthogonal to the classical analysis of expression profile, we harnessed noise patterns to construct the GRN corresponding to fate transition. Our work presents a generalizable framework for top-down fate-decision studies and a practical approach to the taxonomy of cell fate decisions.