Broad and direct interaction between TLR and Siglec families of pattern recognition receptors and its regulation by Neu1

  1. Guo-Yun Chen
  2. Nicholas K Brown
  3. Wei Wu
  4. Zahra Khedri
  5. Hai Yu
  6. Xi Chen
  7. Diantha van de Vlekkert
  8. Alessandra D'Azzo
  9. Pan Zheng
  10. Yang Liu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Children's National Medical Center, United States
  2. Unversity of California, Davis, United States
  3. University of California, Davis, United States
  4. St Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States

Abstract

Both pathogen- and tissue damage-associated molecular patterns induce inflammation through toll-like receptors (TLRs), while sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin superfamily lectin receptors (Siglecs) provide negative regulation. Here we report extensive and direct interactions between these pattern recognition receptors. The promiscuous TLR binders were human SIGLEC-5/9 and mouse Siglec-3/E/F. Mouse Siglec-G did not show appreciable binding to any TLRs tested. Correspondingly, Siglece deletion enhanced dendritic cell responses to all microbial TLR ligands tested, while Siglecg deletion did not affect the responses to these ligands. TLR4 activation triggers Neu1 translocation to cell surface to disrupt TLR4:Siglec-E interaction. Conversely, sialidase inhibitor Neu5Gc2en prevented TLR4 ligand-induced disruption of TLR4:Siglec E/F interactions. Absence of Neu1 in hematopoietic cells or systematic treatment with sialidase inhibitor Neu5Gc2en protected mice against endotoxemia. Our data raised an intriguing possibility of a broad repression of TLR function by Siglecs and a sialidase-mediated de-repression that allows positive feedback of TLR activation during infection.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guo-Yun Chen

    Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nicholas K Brown

    Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Wei Wu

    Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zahra Khedri

    Unversity of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hai Yu

    University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Xi Chen

    University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Diantha van de Vlekkert

    St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alessandra D'Azzo

    St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Pan Zheng

    Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yang Liu

    Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
    For correspondence
    yaliu@cnmc.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Xuetao Cao, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (312-13-05) of the The Children's National Medical Center. Every effort was made to minimize suffering

Version history

  1. Received: July 17, 2014
  2. Accepted: August 28, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 3, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 19, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Chen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,654
    views
  • 767
    downloads
  • 117
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Guo-Yun Chen
  2. Nicholas K Brown
  3. Wei Wu
  4. Zahra Khedri
  5. Hai Yu
  6. Xi Chen
  7. Diantha van de Vlekkert
  8. Alessandra D'Azzo
  9. Pan Zheng
  10. Yang Liu
(2014)
Broad and direct interaction between TLR and Siglec families of pattern recognition receptors and its regulation by Neu1
eLife 3:e04066.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04066

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04066

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.