The activation of IgM- or isotype-switched IgG- and IgE-BCR exhibits distinct mechanical force sensitivity and threshold

  1. Zhengpeng Wan
  2. Xiangjun Chen
  3. Haodong Chen
  4. Qinghua Ji
  5. Yingjia Chen
  6. Jing Wang
  7. Yiyun Cao
  8. Fei Wang
  9. Jizhong Lou
  10. Zhuo Tang
  11. Wanli Liu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Tsinghua University, China
  2. Chinese Academy of Science, China
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Abstract

B lymphocytes use B cell receptors (BCRs) to sense the physical features of the antigens. However, the sensitivity and threshold for the activation of BCRs resulting from the stimulation by mechanical forces are unknown. Here we addressed this question using a double-stranded DNA based tension gauge tether system serving as a predefined mechanical force gauge ranging from 12 to 56 pN. We observed that IgM-BCR activation is dependent on mechanical forces and exhibits a multi-threshold effect. In contrast, the activation of isotype-switched IgG- or IgE-BCR only requires a low threshold of less than 12 pN, providing an explanation for their rapid activation in response to antigen stimulation. Mechanistically, we found that the cytoplasmic tail of the IgG-BCR heavy chain is both required and sufficient to account for the low mechanical force threshold. These results defined the mechanical force sensitivity and threshold that are required to activate different isotyped BCRs.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhengpeng Wan

    MOE Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xiangjun Chen

    MOE Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Haodong Chen

    Natural Products Research Center, Chengdu Institution of Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Qinghua Ji

    Laboratory of RNA Biology, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yingjia Chen

    MOE Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jing Wang

    MOE Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yiyun Cao

    MOE Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Fei Wang

    Natural Products Research Center, Chengdu Institution of Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jizhong Lou

    Laboratory of RNA Biology, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhuo Tang

    Natural Products Research Center, Chengdu Institution of Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wanli Liu

    MOE Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    liuwanli@biomed.tsinghua.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ronald N Germain, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 6, 2015
  2. Accepted: August 8, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 10, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 1, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Wan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,961
    views
  • 761
    downloads
  • 88
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhengpeng Wan
  2. Xiangjun Chen
  3. Haodong Chen
  4. Qinghua Ji
  5. Yingjia Chen
  6. Jing Wang
  7. Yiyun Cao
  8. Fei Wang
  9. Jizhong Lou
  10. Zhuo Tang
  11. Wanli Liu
(2015)
The activation of IgM- or isotype-switched IgG- and IgE-BCR exhibits distinct mechanical force sensitivity and threshold
eLife 4:e06925.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06925

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06925

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.