A K+-selective CNG channel orchestrates Ca2+ signalling in zebrafish sperm

  1. Sylvia Fechner
  2. Luis Alvarez
  3. Wolfgang Bönigk
  4. Astrid Müller
  5. Thomas Berger
  6. Rene Pascal
  7. Christian Trötschel
  8. Ansgar Poetsch
  9. Gabriel Stölting
  10. Kellee R Siegfried
  11. Elisabeth Kremmer
  12. Reinhard Seifert
  13. U Benjamin Kaupp  Is a corresponding author
  1. Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, United States
  2. Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Germany
  3. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
  4. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
  5. University of Massachusetts Boston, United States
  6. Helmholtz-Zentrum München, Germany

Abstract

Calcium in the flagellum controls sperm navigation. In sperm of marine invertebrates and mammals, Ca2+ signalling has been intensely studied, whereas for fish little is known. In sea urchin sperm, a cyclic nucleotide-gated K+ channel (CNGK) mediates a cGMP-induced hyperpolarization that evokes Ca2+ influx. Here, we identify in sperm of the freshwater fish Danio rerio a novel CNGK family member featuring non-canonical properties. It is located in the sperm head rather than the flagellum and is controlled by intracellular pH, but not cyclic nucleotides. Alkalization hyperpolarizes sperm and produces Ca2+ entry. Ca2+ induces spinning-like swimming, different from swimming of sperm from other species. The 'spinning' mode probably guides sperm into the micropyle, a narrow entrance on the surface of fish eggs. A picture is emerging of sperm channel orthologues that employ different activation mechanisms and serve different functions. The channel inventories probably reflect adaptations to species-specific challenges during fertilization.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sylvia Fechner

    Abteilung Molekulare Neurosensorik, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Luis Alvarez

    Abteilung Molekulare Neurosensorik, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Wolfgang Bönigk

    Abteilung Molekulare Neurosensorik, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Astrid Müller

    Abteilung Molekulare Neurosensorik, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Thomas Berger

    Abteilung Molekulare Neurosensorik, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rene Pascal

    Abteilung Molekulare Neurosensorik, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christian Trötschel

    Lehrstuhl Biochemie der Pflanzen, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ansgar Poetsch

    Lehrstuhl Biochemie der Pflanzen, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Gabriel Stölting

    Institute of Complex Systems 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kellee R Siegfried

    Biology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Elisabeth Kremmer

    Institut für Molekulare Immunologie, Helmholtz-Zentrum München, München, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Reinhard Seifert

    Abteilung Molekulare Neurosensorik, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. U Benjamin Kaupp

    Abteilung Molekulare Neurosensorik, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany
    For correspondence
    U.B.Kaupp@caesar.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard Aldrich, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 20, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 9, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 9, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 30, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Fechner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,989
    views
  • 496
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sylvia Fechner
  2. Luis Alvarez
  3. Wolfgang Bönigk
  4. Astrid Müller
  5. Thomas Berger
  6. Rene Pascal
  7. Christian Trötschel
  8. Ansgar Poetsch
  9. Gabriel Stölting
  10. Kellee R Siegfried
  11. Elisabeth Kremmer
  12. Reinhard Seifert
  13. U Benjamin Kaupp
(2015)
A K+-selective CNG channel orchestrates Ca2+ signalling in zebrafish sperm
eLife 4:e07624.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07624

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07624

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Xiao-Ru Chen, Karuna Dixit ... Tatyana I Igumenova
    Research Article

    Regulated hydrolysis of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bis-phosphate to diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-P3 defines a major eukaryotic pathway for translation of extracellular cues to intracellular signaling circuits. Members of the lipid-activated protein kinase C isoenzyme family (PKCs) play central roles in this signaling circuit. One of the regulatory mechanisms employed to downregulate stimulated PKC activity is via a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway that is potentiated by peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Here, we show that contrary to prevailing models, Pin1 does not regulate conventional PKC isoforms α and βII via a canonical cis-trans isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond. Rather, Pin1 acts as a PKC binding partner that controls PKC activity via sequestration of the C-terminal tail of the kinase. The high-resolution structure of full-length Pin1 complexed to the C-terminal tail of PKCβII reveals that a novel bivalent interaction mode underlies the non-catalytic mode of Pin1 action. Specifically, Pin1 adopts a conformation in which it uses the WW and PPIase domains to engage two conserved phosphorylated PKC motifs, the turn motif and hydrophobic motif, respectively. Hydrophobic motif is a non-canonical Pin1-interacting element. The structural information combined with the results of extensive binding studies and experiments in cultured cells suggest that non-catalytic mechanisms represent unappreciated modes of Pin1-mediated regulation of AGC kinases and other key enzymes/substrates.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christian Galicia, Giambattista Guaitoli ... Wim Versées
    Research Article

    Roco proteins entered the limelight after mutations in human LRRK2 were identified as a major cause of familial Parkinson’s disease. LRRK2 is a large and complex protein combining a GTPase and protein kinase activity, and disease mutations increase the kinase activity, while presumably decreasing the GTPase activity. Although a cross-communication between both catalytic activities has been suggested, the underlying mechanisms and the regulatory role of the GTPase domain remain unknown. Several structures of LRRK2 have been reported, but structures of Roco proteins in their activated GTP-bound state are lacking. Here, we use single-particle cryo-electron microscopy to solve the structure of a bacterial Roco protein (CtRoco) in its GTP-bound state, aided by two conformation-specific nanobodies: NbRoco1 and NbRoco2. This structure presents CtRoco in an active monomeric state, featuring a very large GTP-induced conformational change using the LRR-Roc linker as a hinge. Furthermore, this structure shows how NbRoco1 and NbRoco2 collaborate to activate CtRoco in an allosteric way. Altogether, our data provide important new insights into the activation mechanism of Roco proteins, with relevance to LRRK2 regulation, and suggest new routes for the allosteric modulation of their GTPase activity.