Abstract

Genomic instability is a fundamental feature of human cancer often resulting from impaired genome maintenance. In prostate cancer, structural genomic rearrangements are a common mechanism driving tumorigenesis. However, somatic alterations predisposing to chromosomal rearrangements in prostate cancer remain largely undefined. Here, we show that SPOP, the most commonly mutated gene in primary prostate cancer, modulates DNA double strand break (DSB) repair, and that SPOP mutation is associated with genomic instability. In vivo, SPOP mutation results in a transcriptional response consistent with BRCA1 inactivation resulting in impaired homology-directed repair (HDR) of DSB. Furthermore, we found that SPOP mutation sensitizes to DNA damaging therapeutic agents such as PARP inhibitors. These results implicate SPOP as a novel participant in DSB repair, suggest that SPOP mutation drives prostate tumorigenesis in part through genomic instability, and indicate that mutant SPOP may increase response to DNA damaging therapeutics.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gunther Boysen

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Christopher E Barbieri

    Department of Urologygy, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    Christopher E Barbieri, A patent (US Patent Application No: 2013/0331,279) has been issued to Weill Medical College of Cornell University on SPOP mutations in prostate cancer; is listed as co-inventor.
  3. Davide Prandi

    Centre for Integrative Biologygy, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Mirjam Blattner

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Sung-Suk Chae

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Arun Dahija

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Srilakshmi Nataraj

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Dennis Huang

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Clarisse Marotz

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Limei Xu

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Julie Huang

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Paola Lecca

    Centre for Integrative Biologygy, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Sagar Chhangawala

    Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Deli Liu

    Department of Urologygy, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Pengbo Zhou

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Andrea Sboner

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Johann S de Bono

    Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Francesca Demichelis

    Centre for Integrative Biologygy, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Yariv Houvras

    Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Mark A Rubin

    Department of Pathologygy and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    rubinma@med.cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    Mark A Rubin, A patent (US Patent Application No: 2013/0331,279) has been issued to Weill Medical College of Cornell University on SPOP mutations in prostate cancer; is listed as co-inventor.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All protocols were performed with prior approval of the WCMC IACUC under protocol 2012-0065.

Copyright

© 2015, Boysen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,210
    views
  • 1,457
    downloads
  • 144
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gunther Boysen
  2. Christopher E Barbieri
  3. Davide Prandi
  4. Mirjam Blattner
  5. Sung-Suk Chae
  6. Arun Dahija
  7. Srilakshmi Nataraj
  8. Dennis Huang
  9. Clarisse Marotz
  10. Limei Xu
  11. Julie Huang
  12. Paola Lecca
  13. Sagar Chhangawala
  14. Deli Liu
  15. Pengbo Zhou
  16. Andrea Sboner
  17. Johann S de Bono
  18. Francesca Demichelis
  19. Yariv Houvras
  20. Mark A Rubin
(2015)
SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer
eLife 4:e09207.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09207

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09207

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kristina Ehring, Sophia Friederike Ehlers ... Kay Grobe
    Research Article

    The Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway controls embryonic development and tissue homeostasis after birth. This requires regulated solubilization of dual-lipidated, firmly plasma membrane-associated Shh precursors from producing cells. Although it is firmly established that the resistance-nodulation-division transporter Dispatched (Disp) drives this process, it is less clear how lipidated Shh solubilization from the plasma membrane is achieved. We have previously shown that Disp promotes proteolytic solubilization of Shh from its lipidated terminal peptide anchors. This process, termed shedding, converts tightly membrane-associated hydrophobic Shh precursors into delipidated soluble proteins. We show here that Disp-mediated Shh shedding is modulated by a serum factor that we identify as high-density lipoprotein (HDL). In addition to serving as a soluble sink for free membrane cholesterol, HDLs also accept the cholesterol-modified Shh peptide from Disp. The cholesteroylated Shh peptide is necessary and sufficient for Disp-mediated transfer because artificially cholesteroylated mCherry associates with HDL in a Disp-dependent manner, whereas an N-palmitoylated Shh variant lacking C-cholesterol does not. Disp-mediated Shh transfer to HDL is completed by proteolytic processing of the palmitoylated N-terminal membrane anchor. In contrast to dual-processed soluble Shh with moderate bioactivity, HDL-associated N-processed Shh is highly bioactive. We propose that the purpose of generating different soluble forms of Shh from the dual-lipidated precursor is to tune cellular responses in a tissue-type and time-specific manner.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Armando Montoya-Garcia, Idaira M Guerrero-Fonseca ... Michael Schnoor
    Research Article

    Arpin was discovered as an inhibitor of the Arp2/3 complex localized at the lamellipodial tip of fibroblasts, where it regulated migration steering. Recently, we showed that arpin stabilizes the epithelial barrier in an Arp2/3-dependent manner. However, the expression and functions of arpin in endothelial cells (EC) have not yet been described. Arpin mRNA and protein are expressed in EC and downregulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Arpin depletion in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells causes the formation of actomyosin stress fibers leading to increased permeability in an Arp2/3-independent manner. Instead, inhibitors of ROCK1 and ZIPK, kinases involved in the generation of stress fibers, normalize the loss-of-arpin effects on actin filaments and permeability. Arpin-deficient mice are viable but show a characteristic vascular phenotype in the lung including edema, microhemorrhage, and vascular congestion, increased F-actin levels, and vascular permeability. Our data show that, apart from being an Arp2/3 inhibitor, arpin is also a regulator of actomyosin contractility and endothelial barrier integrity.