Claudin-2-dependent paracellular channels are dynamically gated

  1. Christopher R Weber
  2. Guo Hua Liang
  3. Yitang Wang
  4. Sudipto Das
  5. Le Shen
  6. Alan S L Yu
  7. Deborah J Nelson
  8. Jerrold R Turner  Is a corresponding author
  1. The University of Chicago, United States
  2. Lupin Research Park, India
  3. University of Kansas Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Intercellular tight junctions form selectively permeable barriers that seal the paracellular space. Trans-tight junction flux has been measured across large epithelial surfaces, but conductance across individual channels has never been measured. We report a novel trans-tight junction patch clamp technique that detects flux across individual claudin-2 channels within the tight junction of cultured canine renal tubule or human intestinal epithelial monolayers. In both cells, claudin-2 channels display conductances of ~90 pS. The channels are gated, strictly dependent on claudin-2 expression, and display size- and charge-selectivity typical of claudin-2. Kinetic analyses indicate one open and two distinct closed states. Conductance is symmetrical and reversible, characteristic of a passive, paracellular process, and blocked by reduced temperature or site-directed mutagenesis and chemical derivatization of the claudin-2 pore. We conclude that claudin-2 forms gated paracellular channels and speculate that modulation of tight junction channel gating kinetics may be an unappreciated mechanism of barrier regulation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Christopher R Weber

    Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Guo Hua Liang

    Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yitang Wang

    Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sudipto Das

    Lupin Research Park, Pune, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Le Shen

    Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alan S L Yu

    Division of Nephrology and Hypertension and the Kidney Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Deborah J Nelson

    Department of Pharmacological and Physiological Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jerrold R Turner

    Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    jturner@bsd.uchicago.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Fiona M Watt, King's College London, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: July 6, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 12, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 14, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 2, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Weber et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,664
    views
  • 771
    downloads
  • 90
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Christopher R Weber
  2. Guo Hua Liang
  3. Yitang Wang
  4. Sudipto Das
  5. Le Shen
  6. Alan S L Yu
  7. Deborah J Nelson
  8. Jerrold R Turner
(2015)
Claudin-2-dependent paracellular channels are dynamically gated
eLife 4:e09906.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09906

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09906

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Xiao-Ru Chen, Karuna Dixit ... Tatyana I Igumenova
    Research Article

    Regulated hydrolysis of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bis-phosphate to diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-P3 defines a major eukaryotic pathway for translation of extracellular cues to intracellular signaling circuits. Members of the lipid-activated protein kinase C isoenzyme family (PKCs) play central roles in this signaling circuit. One of the regulatory mechanisms employed to downregulate stimulated PKC activity is via a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway that is potentiated by peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Here, we show that contrary to prevailing models, Pin1 does not regulate conventional PKC isoforms α and βII via a canonical cis-trans isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond. Rather, Pin1 acts as a PKC binding partner that controls PKC activity via sequestration of the C-terminal tail of the kinase. The high-resolution structure of full-length Pin1 complexed to the C-terminal tail of PKCβII reveals that a novel bivalent interaction mode underlies the non-catalytic mode of Pin1 action. Specifically, Pin1 adopts a conformation in which it uses the WW and PPIase domains to engage two conserved phosphorylated PKC motifs, the turn motif and hydrophobic motif, respectively. Hydrophobic motif is a non-canonical Pin1-interacting element. The structural information combined with the results of extensive binding studies and experiments in cultured cells suggest that non-catalytic mechanisms represent unappreciated modes of Pin1-mediated regulation of AGC kinases and other key enzymes/substrates.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christian Galicia, Giambattista Guaitoli ... Wim Versées
    Research Article

    Roco proteins entered the limelight after mutations in human LRRK2 were identified as a major cause of familial Parkinson’s disease. LRRK2 is a large and complex protein combining a GTPase and protein kinase activity, and disease mutations increase the kinase activity, while presumably decreasing the GTPase activity. Although a cross-communication between both catalytic activities has been suggested, the underlying mechanisms and the regulatory role of the GTPase domain remain unknown. Several structures of LRRK2 have been reported, but structures of Roco proteins in their activated GTP-bound state are lacking. Here, we use single-particle cryo-electron microscopy to solve the structure of a bacterial Roco protein (CtRoco) in its GTP-bound state, aided by two conformation-specific nanobodies: NbRoco1 and NbRoco2. This structure presents CtRoco in an active monomeric state, featuring a very large GTP-induced conformational change using the LRR-Roc linker as a hinge. Furthermore, this structure shows how NbRoco1 and NbRoco2 collaborate to activate CtRoco in an allosteric way. Altogether, our data provide important new insights into the activation mechanism of Roco proteins, with relevance to LRRK2 regulation, and suggest new routes for the allosteric modulation of their GTPase activity.