Structural basis of nucleic-acid recognition and double-strand unwinding by the essential neuronal protein Pur-alpha

  1. Janine Weber
  2. Han Bao
  3. Christoph Hartlmüller
  4. Zhiqin Wang
  5. Almut Windhager
  6. Robert Janowski
  7. Tobias Madl
  8. Peng Jin
  9. Dierk Niessing  Is a corresponding author
  1. Helmholtz Zentrum München - German research center for environmental health, Germany
  2. Emory University, United States
  3. Technische Universität München, Germany

Abstract

The neuronal DNA-/RNA-binding protein Pur-alpha is a transcription regulator and core factor for mRNA-localization. Pur-alpha deficient mice die after birth with pleiotropic neuronal defects. Here we report the crystal structure of the DNA-/RNA-binding domain of Pur-alpha in complex with ssDNA. It reveals base-specific recognition and offers a molecular explanation for the effect of point mutations in the 5q31.3 microdeletion syndrome. Consistent with the crystal structure, biochemical and NMR data indicate that Pur-alpha binds DNA and RNA in the same way, suggesting binding modes for tri- and hexanucleotide repeat RNAs in two neurodegenerative RNAopathies. Additionally, structure-based in vitro experiments resolved the molecular mechanism of Pur-alpha's unwindase activity. Complementing in vivo analyses in Drosophila demonstrated the importance of a highly conserved phenylalanine for Pur-alpha's unwinding and neuroprotective function. By uncovering the molecular mechanisms of nucleic-acid binding, this study contributes to understanding the cellular role of Pur-alpha and its implications in neurodegenerative diseases.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Janine Weber

    Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German research center for environmental health, Neuherberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Han Bao

    Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christoph Hartlmüller

    Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zhiqin Wang

    Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Almut Windhager

    Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German research center for environmental health, Neuherberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Robert Janowski

    Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German research center for environmental health, Neuherberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tobias Madl

    Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German research center for environmental health, Neuherberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Peng Jin

    Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dierk Niessing

    Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German research center for environmental health, Neuherberg, Germany
    For correspondence
    dierk.niessing@med.uni-muenchen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Karsten Weis, ETH Zürich, Switzerland

Version history

  1. Received: September 3, 2015
  2. Accepted: January 7, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 8, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: January 12, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: February 11, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Weber et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,224
    views
  • 442
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Janine Weber
  2. Han Bao
  3. Christoph Hartlmüller
  4. Zhiqin Wang
  5. Almut Windhager
  6. Robert Janowski
  7. Tobias Madl
  8. Peng Jin
  9. Dierk Niessing
(2016)
Structural basis of nucleic-acid recognition and double-strand unwinding by the essential neuronal protein Pur-alpha
eLife 5:e11297.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11297

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11297

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.