Trifunctional cross-linker for mapping protein-protein interaction networks and comparing protein conformational states

  1. Dan Tan
  2. Qiang Li
  3. Mei-Jun Zhang
  4. Chao Liu
  5. Chengying Ma
  6. Pan Zhang
  7. Yue-He Ding
  8. Sheng-Bo Fan
  9. Li Tao
  10. Bing Yang
  11. Xiangke Li
  12. Shoucai Ma
  13. Junjie Liu
  14. Boya Feng
  15. Xiaohui Liu
  16. Hong-Wei Wang
  17. Si-Min He
  18. Ning Gao
  19. Keqiong Ye
  20. Meng-Qiu Dong  Is a corresponding author
  21. Xiaoguang Lei
  1. Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China
  2. National Institute of Biological Sciences, China
  3. Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  4. Tsinghua University, China
  5. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, China
  6. Tianjin University, China

Abstract

To improve chemical cross-linking of proteins coupled with mass spectrometry (CXMS), we developed a lysine-targeted enrichable cross-linker containing a biotin tag for affinity purification, a chemical cleavage site to separate cross-linked peptides away from biotin after enrichment, and a spacer arm that can be labeled with stable isotopes for quantitation. By locating the flexible proteins on the surface of 70S ribosome, we show that this trifunctional cross-linker is effective at attaining structural information not easily attainable by crystallography and electron microscopy. From a crude Rrp46 immunoprecipitate, it helped identify two direct binding partners of Rrp46 and 15 protein-protein interactions (PPIs) among the co-immunoprecipitated exosome subunits. Applying it to E. coli and C. elegans lysates, we identified 3130 and 893 inter-linked lysine pairs, representing 677 and 121 PPIs. Using a quantitative CXMS workflow we demonstrate that it can reveal changes in the reactivity of lysine residues due to protein-nucleic acid interaction.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dan Tan

    Graduate Program, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Qiang Li

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mei-Jun Zhang

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chao Liu

    Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Chengying Ma

    Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Pan Zhang

    Graduate Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yue-He Ding

    Graduate Program, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sheng-Bo Fan

    Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Li Tao

    Graduate Program, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Bing Yang

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xiangke Li

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Shoucai Ma

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Junjie Liu

    Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Boya Feng

    Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Xiaohui Liu

    College of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Hong-Wei Wang

    Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Si-Min He

    Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Ning Gao

    Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Keqiong Ye

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Meng-Qiu Dong

    Graduate Program, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    dongmengqiu@nibs.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Xiaoguang Lei

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Brian Chait

Version history

  1. Received: October 23, 2015
  2. Accepted: February 26, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 8, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 18, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: September 20, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Tan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,091
    views
  • 2,291
    downloads
  • 101
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dan Tan
  2. Qiang Li
  3. Mei-Jun Zhang
  4. Chao Liu
  5. Chengying Ma
  6. Pan Zhang
  7. Yue-He Ding
  8. Sheng-Bo Fan
  9. Li Tao
  10. Bing Yang
  11. Xiangke Li
  12. Shoucai Ma
  13. Junjie Liu
  14. Boya Feng
  15. Xiaohui Liu
  16. Hong-Wei Wang
  17. Si-Min He
  18. Ning Gao
  19. Keqiong Ye
  20. Meng-Qiu Dong
  21. Xiaoguang Lei
(2016)
Trifunctional cross-linker for mapping protein-protein interaction networks and comparing protein conformational states
eLife 5:e12509.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12509

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12509

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Nicholas James Ose, Paul Campitelli ... Sefika Banu Ozkan
    Research Article

    We integrate evolutionary predictions based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution with protein dynamics to generate mechanistic insight into the molecular adaptations of the SARS-COV-2 spike (S) protein. With this approach, we first identified candidate adaptive polymorphisms (CAPs) of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and assessed the impact of these CAPs through dynamics analysis. Not only have we found that CAPs frequently overlap with well-known functional sites, but also, using several different dynamics-based metrics, we reveal the critical allosteric interplay between SARS-CoV-2 CAPs and the S protein binding sites with the human ACE2 (hACE2) protein. CAPs interact far differently with the hACE2 binding site residues in the open conformation of the S protein compared to the closed form. In particular, the CAP sites control the dynamics of binding residues in the open state, suggesting an allosteric control of hACE2 binding. We also explored the characteristic mutations of different SARS-CoV-2 strains to find dynamic hallmarks and potential effects of future mutations. Our analyses reveal that Delta strain-specific variants have non-additive (i.e., epistatic) interactions with CAP sites, whereas the less pathogenic Omicron strains have mostly additive mutations. Finally, our dynamics-based analysis suggests that the novel mutations observed in the Omicron strain epistatically interact with the CAP sites to help escape antibody binding.