The cell proliferation antigen Ki-67 organises heterochromatin

  1. Michal Sobecki
  2. Karim Mrouj
  3. Alain Camasses
  4. Nikolaos Parisis
  5. Emilien Nicolas
  6. David Llères
  7. François Gerbe
  8. Susana Prieto
  9. Liliana Krasinska
  10. Alexandre David
  11. Manuel Eguren
  12. Marie-Christine Birling
  13. Serge Urbach
  14. Sonia Hem
  15. Jérôme Déjardin
  16. Marcos Malumbres
  17. Philippe Jay
  18. Vjekoslav Dulic
  19. Denis LJ Lafontaine
  20. Robert P Feil
  21. Daniel Fisher  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell, Université Paris Sud, France
  2. Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, France
  3. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
  4. University of Montpellier, France
  5. Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Spain
  6. Mouse Clinical Institute, France
  7. SupAgro, France

Abstract

Antigen Ki-67 is a nuclear protein expressed in proliferating mammalian cells. It is widely used in cancer histopathology but its functions remain unclear. Here, we show that Ki-67 controls heterochromatin organisation. Altering Ki-67 expression levels did not significantly affect cell proliferation in vivo. Ki-67 mutant mice developed normally and cells lacking Ki-67 proliferated efficiently. Conversely, upregulation of Ki-67 expression in differentiated tissues did not prevent cell cycle arrest. Ki-67 interactors included proteins involved in nucleolar processes and chromatin regulators. Ki-67 depletion disrupted nucleologenesis but did not inhibit pre-rRNA processing. In contrast, it altered gene expression. Ki-67 silencing also had wide-ranging effects on chromatin organisation, disrupting heterochromatin compaction and long-range genomic interactions. Trimethylation of histone H3K9 and H4K20 was relocalised within the nucleus. Finally, overexpression of human or Xenopus Ki-67 induced ectopic heterochromatin formation. Altogether, our results suggest that Ki-67 expression in proliferating cells spatially organises heterochromatin, thereby controlling gene expression.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michal Sobecki

    Department of Genome Biology, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell, Université Paris Sud, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Karim Mrouj

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alain Camasses

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nikolaos Parisis

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Emilien Nicolas

    RNA Molecular Biology, Fonds de la Recherche Nationale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi-Gosselies, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. David Llères

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. François Gerbe

    Faculty of Sciences, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Susana Prieto

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Liliana Krasinska

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Alexandre David

    Faculty of Sciences, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Manuel Eguren

    Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Marie-Christine Birling

    Mouse Clinical Institute, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Serge Urbach

    Faculty of Sciences, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Sonia Hem

    Mass Spectrometry Platform MSPP, SupAgro, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jérôme Déjardin

    Faculty of Sciences, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Marcos Malumbres

    Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Philippe Jay

    Faculty of Sciences, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Vjekoslav Dulic

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Denis LJ Lafontaine

    RNA Molecular Biology, Fonds de la Recherche Nationale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi-Gosselies, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Robert P Feil

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Daniel Fisher

    Montpellier Institute of Molecular Genetics, Montpellier, France
    For correspondence
    daniel.fisher@igmm.cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Fiona M Watt, King's College London, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed in accordance with international ethics standards and were subjected to approval by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of Languedoc Roussillon and the Ministry for Higher Education and Research

Version history

  1. Received: December 21, 2015
  2. Accepted: March 6, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 7, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 13, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Sobecki et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 15,259
    views
  • 2,053
    downloads
  • 234
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michal Sobecki
  2. Karim Mrouj
  3. Alain Camasses
  4. Nikolaos Parisis
  5. Emilien Nicolas
  6. David Llères
  7. François Gerbe
  8. Susana Prieto
  9. Liliana Krasinska
  10. Alexandre David
  11. Manuel Eguren
  12. Marie-Christine Birling
  13. Serge Urbach
  14. Sonia Hem
  15. Jérôme Déjardin
  16. Marcos Malumbres
  17. Philippe Jay
  18. Vjekoslav Dulic
  19. Denis LJ Lafontaine
  20. Robert P Feil
  21. Daniel Fisher
(2016)
The cell proliferation antigen Ki-67 organises heterochromatin
eLife 5:e13722.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13722

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13722

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Christopher TA Lewis, Elise G Melhedegaard ... Julien Ochala
    Research Article

    Hibernation is a period of metabolic suppression utilized by many small and large mammal species to survive during winter periods. As the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood, our study aimed to determine whether skeletal muscle myosin and its metabolic efficiency undergo alterations during hibernation to optimize energy utilization. We isolated muscle fibers from small hibernators, Ictidomys tridecemlineatus and Eliomys quercinus and larger hibernators, Ursus arctos and Ursus americanus. We then conducted loaded Mant-ATP chase experiments alongside X-ray diffraction to measure resting myosin dynamics and its ATP demand. In parallel, we performed multiple proteomics analyses. Our results showed a preservation of myosin structure in U. arctos and U. americanus during hibernation, whilst in I. tridecemlineatus and E. quercinus, changes in myosin metabolic states during torpor unexpectedly led to higher levels in energy expenditure of type II, fast-twitch muscle fibers at ambient lab temperatures (20 °C). Upon repeating loaded Mant-ATP chase experiments at 8 °C (near the body temperature of torpid animals), we found that myosin ATP consumption in type II muscle fibers was reduced by 77–107% during torpor compared to active periods. Additionally, we observed Myh2 hyper-phosphorylation during torpor in I. tridecemilineatus, which was predicted to stabilize the myosin molecule. This may act as a potential molecular mechanism mitigating myosin-associated increases in skeletal muscle energy expenditure during periods of torpor in response to cold exposure. Altogether, we demonstrate that resting myosin is altered in hibernating mammals, contributing to significant changes to the ATP consumption of skeletal muscle. Additionally, we observe that it is further altered in response to cold exposure and highlight myosin as a potentially contributor to skeletal muscle non-shivering thermogenesis.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jun Yang, Shitian Zou ... Xiaochun Bai
    Research Article

    Quiescence (G0) maintenance and exit are crucial for tissue homeostasis and regeneration in mammals. Here, we show that methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (Mecp2) expression is cell cycle-dependent and negatively regulates quiescence exit in cultured cells and in an injury-induced liver regeneration mouse model. Specifically, acute reduction of Mecp2 is required for efficient quiescence exit as deletion of Mecp2 accelerates, while overexpression of Mecp2 delays quiescence exit, and forced expression of Mecp2 after Mecp2 conditional knockout rescues cell cycle reentry. The E3 ligase Nedd4 mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of Mecp2, and thus facilitates quiescence exit. A genome-wide study uncovered the dual role of Mecp2 in preventing quiescence exit by transcriptionally activating metabolic genes while repressing proliferation-associated genes. Particularly disruption of two nuclear receptors, Rara or Nr1h3, accelerates quiescence exit, mimicking the Mecp2 depletion phenotype. Our studies unravel a previously unrecognized role for Mecp2 as an essential regulator of quiescence exit and tissue regeneration.