The synaptic ribbon is critical for sound encoding at high rates and with temporal precision

  1. Philippe Jean
  2. David Lopez de la Morena
  3. Susann Michanski
  4. Lina María Jaime Tobón
  5. Rituparna Chakrabarti
  6. Maria Magdalena Picher
  7. Jakob Neef
  8. SangYong Jung
  9. Mehmet Gültas
  10. Stephan Maxeiner
  11. Andreas Neef  Is a corresponding author
  12. Carolin Wichmann  Is a corresponding author
  13. Nicola Strenzke  Is a corresponding author
  14. Chad Grabner  Is a corresponding author
  15. Tobias Moser  Is a corresponding author
  1. University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
  2. University of Göttingen, Germany
  3. Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
  4. University of the Saarland, Germany
  5. Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Germany

Abstract

We studied the role of the synaptic ribbon for sound encoding at the synapses between inner hair cells (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) in mice lacking RIBEYE (RBEKO/KO). Electron and immunofluorescence microscopy revealed a lack of synaptic ribbons and an assembly of several small active zones (AZs) at each synaptic contact. Spontaneous and sound-evoked firing rates of SGNs and their compound action potential were reduced, indicating impaired transmission at ribbonless IHC-SGN synapses. The temporal precision of sound encoding was impaired and the recovery of SGN-firing from adaptation indicated slowed synaptic vesicle (SV) replenishment. Activation of Ca2+-channels was shifted to more depolarized potentials and exocytosis was reduced for weak depolarizations. Presynaptic Ca2+-signals showed a broader spread, compatible with the altered Ca2+-channel clustering observed by super-resolution immunofluorescence microscopy. We postulate that RIBEYE disruption is partially compensated by multi-AZ organization. The remaining synaptic deficit indicates ribbon function in SV-replenishment and Ca2+-channel regulation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Philippe Jean

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. David Lopez de la Morena

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Susann Michanski

    Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lina María Jaime Tobón

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Rituparna Chakrabarti

    Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Maria Magdalena Picher

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0722-3883
  7. Jakob Neef

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. SangYong Jung

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Mehmet Gültas

    Department of Breeding Informatics, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Stephan Maxeiner

    Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of the Saarland, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andreas Neef

    Bernstein Group Biophysics of Neural Computation, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    aneef@gwdg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4445-7478
  12. Carolin Wichmann

    Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    carolin.wichmann@med.uni-goettingen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Nicola Strenzke

    Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    nicola.strenzke@med.uni-goettingen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Chad Grabner

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    chad.grabner@mpibpc.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Tobias Moser

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    tmoser@gwdg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7145-0533

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Collaborative Research Center 889)

  • Carolin Wichmann
  • Nicola Strenzke
  • Tobias Moser

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Leibniz program MO 896/51)

  • Tobias Moser

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Max-Planck-Fellowship)

  • Tobias Moser

Niedersächsisches Vorab

  • Tobias Moser

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christine Petit, Institut Pasteur, France

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments complied with national animal care guidelines and were approved by the University of Göttingen Board for Animal Welfare and the Animal Welfare Office of the State of Lower Saxony (permit number: 14-1391).

Version history

  1. Received: July 7, 2017
  2. Accepted: December 19, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 12, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 1, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Jean et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,733
    views
  • 617
    downloads
  • 84
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Philippe Jean
  2. David Lopez de la Morena
  3. Susann Michanski
  4. Lina María Jaime Tobón
  5. Rituparna Chakrabarti
  6. Maria Magdalena Picher
  7. Jakob Neef
  8. SangYong Jung
  9. Mehmet Gültas
  10. Stephan Maxeiner
  11. Andreas Neef
  12. Carolin Wichmann
  13. Nicola Strenzke
  14. Chad Grabner
  15. Tobias Moser
(2018)
The synaptic ribbon is critical for sound encoding at high rates and with temporal precision
eLife 7:e29275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29275

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tongtong Ma, Ruimin Ren ... Heng Wang
    Research Article

    Current studies on cultured meat mainly focus on the muscle tissue reconstruction in vitro, but lack the formation of intramuscular fat, which is a crucial factor in determining taste, texture, and nutritional contents. Therefore, incorporating fat into cultured meat is of superior value. In this study, we employed the myogenic/lipogenic transdifferentiation of chicken fibroblasts in 3D to produce muscle mass and deposit fat into the same cells without the co-culture or mixture of different cells or fat substances. The immortalized chicken embryonic fibroblasts were implanted into the hydrogel scaffold, and the cell proliferation and myogenic transdifferentiation were conducted in 3D to produce the whole-cut meat mimics. Compared to 2D, cells grown in 3D matrix showed elevated myogenesis and collagen production. We further induced fat deposition in the transdifferentiated muscle cells and the triglyceride content could be manipulated to match and exceed the levels of chicken meat. The gene expression analysis indicated that both lineage-specific and multifunctional signalings could contribute to the generation of muscle/fat matrix. Overall, we were able to precisely modulate muscle, fat, and extracellular matrix contents according to balanced or specialized meat preferences. These findings provide new avenues for customized cultured meat production with desired intramuscular fat contents that can be tailored to meet the diverse demands of consumers.

    1. Cell Biology
    Gang Liu, Yunxuan Hou ... Xiumei Jiang
    Research Article

    Erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis are stringently regulated by signaling pathways. However, the precise molecular mechanisms through which signaling pathways regulate key transcription factors controlling erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis remain partially understood. Herein, we identified heat shock cognate B (HSCB), which is well known for its iron–sulfur cluster delivery function, as an indispensable protein for friend of GATA 1 (FOG1) nuclear translocation during erythropoiesis of K562 human erythroleukemia cells and cord-blood-derived human CD34+CD90+hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), as well as during megakaryopoiesis of the CD34+CD90+HSCs. Mechanistically, HSCB could be phosphorylated by phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) to bind with and mediate the proteasomal degradation of transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3 (TACC3), which otherwise detained FOG1 in the cytoplasm, thereby facilitating FOG1 nuclear translocation. Given that PI3K is activated during both erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis, and that FOG1 is a key transcription factor for these processes, our findings elucidate an important, previously unrecognized iron–sulfur cluster delivery independent function of HSCB in erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis.