Reprogramming the antigen specificity of B cells using genome-editing technologies

  1. James E Voss  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alicia Gonzalez-Martin  Is a corresponding author
  3. Raiees Andrabi
  4. Roberta P Fuller
  5. Ben Murrell
  6. Laura E McCoy
  7. Katelyn Porter
  8. Deli Huang
  9. Wenjuan Li
  10. Devin Sok
  11. Khoa Le
  12. Bryan Briney
  13. Morgan Chateau
  14. Geoffrey Rogers
  15. Lars Hangartner
  16. Ann J Feeney
  17. David Nemazee
  18. Paula Cannon
  19. Dennis Burton  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Scripps Research Institute, United States
  2. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain
  3. Karolinska Institutet, United States
  4. University College London, United Kingdom
  5. University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

We have developed a method to introduce novel paratopes into the human antibody repertoire by modifying the immunoglobulin (Ig) genes of mature B cells directly using genome editing technologies. We used CRISPR-Cas9 in a homology directed repair strategy, to replace the heavy chain (HC) variable region in B cell lines with that from an HIV broadly neutralizing antibody, PG9. Our strategy is designed to function in cells that have undergone VDJ recombination using any combination of variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) genes. The modified locus expresses PG9 HC which pairs with native light chains resulting in the cell surface expression of HIV specific B cell receptors (BCRs). Endogenous activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) in engineered cells allowed for Ig class switching and generated BCR variants with improved anti-HIV neutralizing activity. Thus, BCRs engineered in this way retain the genetic flexibility normally required for affinity maturation during adaptive immune responses. Peripheral blood derived primary B cells from three different donors were edited using this strategy. Engineered cells could bind the PG9 epitope by FACS and sequenced mRNA from these cells showed PG9 HC expressed as several different isotypes after culture with CD40 ligand and IL-4.

Data availability

Next generation sequencing data from RT-PCR amplicons have been deposited at Dryad:DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.45j0r70.Amplification free whole genome sequencing reads mapped to the human reference genome have been deposited to NCBI with BioSample accession numbers SAMN09404498 and SAMN09404497

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. James E Voss

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    jvoss@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4777-1596
  2. Alicia Gonzalez-Martin

    Department of Biochemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
    For correspondence
    alicia.gonzalezm@uam.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Raiees Andrabi

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Roberta P Fuller

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ben Murrell

    Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Laura E McCoy

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Katelyn Porter

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Deli Huang

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Wenjuan Li

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Devin Sok

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Khoa Le

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Bryan Briney

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Morgan Chateau

    Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Geoffrey Rogers

    Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Lars Hangartner

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Ann J Feeney

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. David Nemazee

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Paula Cannon

    Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Dennis Burton

    Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    burton@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institutes of Health (5R01DE025167-05)

  • Dennis Burton

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1183956)

  • James E Voss

Ramón y Cajal Merit Award, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades (RYC-2016-21155)

  • Alicia Gonzalez-Martin

Marie-Curie Fellowship (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IOF)

  • Laura E McCoy

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Tomohiro Kurosaki, Osaka University, Japan

Version history

  1. Received: October 19, 2018
  2. Accepted: December 31, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 16, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: January 17, 2019 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: January 31, 2019 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2019, Voss et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,767
    views
  • 1,584
    downloads
  • 65
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. James E Voss
  2. Alicia Gonzalez-Martin
  3. Raiees Andrabi
  4. Roberta P Fuller
  5. Ben Murrell
  6. Laura E McCoy
  7. Katelyn Porter
  8. Deli Huang
  9. Wenjuan Li
  10. Devin Sok
  11. Khoa Le
  12. Bryan Briney
  13. Morgan Chateau
  14. Geoffrey Rogers
  15. Lars Hangartner
  16. Ann J Feeney
  17. David Nemazee
  18. Paula Cannon
  19. Dennis Burton
(2019)
Reprogramming the antigen specificity of B cells using genome-editing technologies
eLife 8:e42995.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42995

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42995

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.