Aurkb/PP1-mediated resetting of Oct4 during the cell cycle determines the identity of embryonic stem cells

  1. Jihoon Shin
  2. Tae Wan Kim
  3. Hyunsoo Kim
  4. Hye Ji Kim
  5. Min Young Suh
  6. Sangho Lee
  7. Han-Teo Lee
  8. Sojung Kwak
  9. Sang-Eun Lee
  10. Jong-Hyuk Lee
  11. Hyonchol Jang
  12. Eun-Jung Cho
  13. Hong-Duk Youn  Is a corresponding author
  1. Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
  2. Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
  3. National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea
  4. Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Pluripotency transcription programs by core transcription factors (CTFs) might be reset during M/G1 transition to maintain the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells (ESCs). However, little is known about how CTFs are governed during cell cycle progression. Here, we demonstrate that the regulation of Oct4 by Aurora kinase b (Aurkb)/protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) during the cell cycle is important for resetting Oct4 to pluripotency and cell cycle genes in determining the identity of ESCs. Aurkb phosphorylates Oct4(S229) during G2/M phase, leading to the dissociation of Oct4 from chromatin, whereas PP1 binds Oct4 and dephosphorylates Oct4(S229) during M/G1 transition, which resets Oct4-driven transcription for pluripotency and the cell cycle. Aurkb phosphor-mimetic and PP1 binding-deficient mutations in Oct4 alter the cell cycle, effect the loss of pluripotency in ESCs, and decrease the efficiency of somatic cell reprogramming. Our findings provide evidence that the cell cycle is linked directly to pluripotency programs in ESCs.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jihoon Shin

    National Creative Research Center for Epigenome Reprogramming Network, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Tae Wan Kim

    National Creative Research Center for Epigenome Reprogramming Network, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hyunsoo Kim

    National Creative Research Center for Epigenome Reprogramming Network, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hye Ji Kim

    Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Min Young Suh

    Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sangho Lee

    Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Han-Teo Lee

    Interdisciplinary Program in Genetic Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sojung Kwak

    National Creative Research Center for Epigenome Reprogramming Network, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sang-Eun Lee

    National Creative Research Center for Epigenome Reprogramming Network, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jong-Hyuk Lee

    National Creative Research Center for Epigenome Reprogramming Network, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Hyonchol Jang

    Division of Cancer Biology, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Eun-Jung Cho

    College of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Hong-Duk Youn

    National Creative Research Center for Epigenome Reprogramming Network, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    hdyoun@snu.ac.kr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. George Q Daley, Harvard Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 14, 2015
  2. Accepted: February 13, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 15, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: February 17, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: March 9, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Shin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,316
    views
  • 858
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jihoon Shin
  2. Tae Wan Kim
  3. Hyunsoo Kim
  4. Hye Ji Kim
  5. Min Young Suh
  6. Sangho Lee
  7. Han-Teo Lee
  8. Sojung Kwak
  9. Sang-Eun Lee
  10. Jong-Hyuk Lee
  11. Hyonchol Jang
  12. Eun-Jung Cho
  13. Hong-Duk Youn
(2016)
Aurkb/PP1-mediated resetting of Oct4 during the cell cycle determines the identity of embryonic stem cells
eLife 5:e10877.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10877

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10877

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.