Control of the structural landscape and neuronal proteotoxicity of mutant Huntingtin by domains flanking the polyQ tract

  1. Koning Shen
  2. Barbara Calamini
  3. Jonathan A Fauerbach
  4. Boxue Ma
  5. Sarah H Shahmoradian
  6. Ivana L Serrano Lachapel
  7. Wah Chiu
  8. Donald C Lo
  9. Judith Frydman  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Sanofi R&D, France
  3. Miltenyi Biotec, Germany
  4. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  5. Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
  6. Duke University Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Many neurodegenerative diseases are linked to amyloid aggregation. In Huntington's disease (HD), neurotoxicity correlates with increased aggregation propensity of a polyglutamine (polyQ) expansion in exon 1 of mutant huntingtin protein (mHtt). Here we establish how the domains flanking the polyQ tract shape the mHtt conformational landscape in vitro and in neurons. In vitro, the flanking domains have opposing effects on the conformation and stabilities of oligomers and amyloid fibrils. The N-terminal N17 promotes amyloid fibril formation, while the C-terminal Proline Rich Domain destabilizes fibrils and enhances oligomer formation. However, in neurons both domains act synergistically to engage protective chaperone and degradation pathways promoting mHtt proteostasis. Surprisingly, when proteotoxicity was assessed in rat corticostriatal brain slices, either flanking region alone sufficed to generate a neurotoxic conformation, while the polyQ tract alone exhibited minimal toxicity. Linking mHtt structural properties to its neuronal proteostasis should inform new strategies for neuroprotection in polyQ-expansion diseases.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Koning Shen

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2607-449X
  2. Barbara Calamini

    Open Innovation Access Platform, Sanofi R&D, Strasbourg, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jonathan A Fauerbach

    Miltenyi Biotec, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Boxue Ma

    Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sarah H Shahmoradian

    Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ivana L Serrano Lachapel

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Wah Chiu

    Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Donald C Lo

    Center for Drug Discovery, Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Judith Frydman

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    jfrydman@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2302-6943

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (gm56433)

  • Koning Shen
  • Judith Frydman

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS080514)

  • Barbara Calamini
  • Donald C Lo

NIH Office of the Director (pn2ey016525)

  • Sarah H Shahmoradian
  • Wah Chiu
  • Judith Frydman

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (gm103832)

  • Boxue Ma
  • Sarah H Shahmoradian
  • Wah Chiu

ellison medical foundation

  • Jonathan A Fauerbach
  • Judith Frydman

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS092525)

  • Koning Shen
  • Judith Frydman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeffery W Kelly, The Scripps Research Institute, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: No human subjects. Animals were handled and killed in accordance with NIH guidelines and under approval and oversight of the Duke University institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) to Don Lo. Protocol number A147-14-06.

Version history

  1. Received: May 21, 2016
  2. Accepted: October 17, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 18, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 2, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Shen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,388
    views
  • 938
    downloads
  • 61
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Koning Shen
  2. Barbara Calamini
  3. Jonathan A Fauerbach
  4. Boxue Ma
  5. Sarah H Shahmoradian
  6. Ivana L Serrano Lachapel
  7. Wah Chiu
  8. Donald C Lo
  9. Judith Frydman
(2016)
Control of the structural landscape and neuronal proteotoxicity of mutant Huntingtin by domains flanking the polyQ tract
eLife 5:e18065.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18065

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18065

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.