Browse our Editorials

Page 4 of 4
  1. Scientific Publishing: A year in the life of eLife

    Randy Schekman, Fiona M Watt, Detlef Weigel
    Improving the peer review process, overcoming the limitations of print journals and providing open access to the very best work in the life and biomedical sciences are three highlights of our first year.
  2. Science Policy: Reforming research assessment

    Randy Schekman, Mark Patterson
    It is time for the research community to rethink how the outputs of scientific research are evaluated and, as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment makes clear, this should involve replacing the journal impact factor with a broad range of more meaningful approaches.
  3. Scientific Publishing: The eLife approach to peer review

    Randy Schekman, Fiona Watt, Detlef Weigel
    All editorial decisions at eLife are taken by working scientists in a process that emphasizes fairness, speed and transparency.
  4. Scientific Publishing: Launching eLife, Part 2

    Randy Schekman, Fiona Watt, Detlef Weigel
    With a commitment to open access and innovation in peer review, eLife aims to publish important results in the life and biomedical sciences in a flexible digital format that allows authors to present their work in full, including the key data on which the conclusions are based.
  5. Scientific Publishing: Launching eLife, Part 1

    Randy Schekman, Mark Patterson ... Detlef Weigel
    The new open-access journal eLife has launched, making its first content available in PubMed Central. In addition to publishing science of the highest quality, the journal aims to improve both the peer-review process and the presentation of new research results.