Correction: Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli

Main text

Peters MAK, Lau H. 2015. Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli. eLife 4:e09651. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09651.

Published October 03, 2015

In the published article, the code file used to generate the bottom row of Figure 3 contained an error. This led to altered visualization of the summary statistics for the model’s behaviour. The error was not present in the code file used to fit the model to behavioural data or calculate its goodness of fit, and so does not affect any quantitative metrics presented in the article. Additionally, due to an oversight the source code for the ideal observer model was not included in the originally published article. The correct code is now available.

The corrected Figure 3 is shown here:

The originally published Figure 3 is shown for reference:

The article has been corrected accordingly.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Megan AK Peters

  2. Hakwan Lau

Version history

  1. Received:
  2. Accepted:
  3. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2016, Peters et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 478
    views
  • 12
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Megan AK Peters
  2. Hakwan Lau
(2016)
Correction: Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli
eLife 5:e16332.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16332

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16332