6 figures

Figures

Comparison of recorded values with model predictions using literature conductivity values for Subject P03 scaled to 1 mA.

Points falling on the dashed blue line represent perfect prediction (slope s=1). The literature values gives close estimates of electric field magnitude (measurements are 72% of predicted values, s=0.72_, green line). Skin, skull and brain conductivities are optimized to minimize prediction error for field projections (i.e. minimize mean square distance from dashed line in panel (B)) which corrects this magnitude mismatch, and is shown in Figure 5E.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yu Huang
  2. Anli A Liu
  3. Belen Lafon
  4. Daniel Friedman
  5. Michael Dayan
  6. Xiuyuan Wang
  7. Marom Bikson
  8. Werner K Doyle
  9. Orrin Devinsky
  10. Lucas C Parra
(2018)
Correction: Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation
eLife 7:e35178.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35178