Genomic adaptations in information processing underpin trophic strategy in a whole-ecosystem nutrient enrichment experiment

  1. Jordan G Okie  Is a corresponding author
  2. Amisha T Poret-Peterson
  3. Zarraz MP Lee
  4. Alexander Richter
  5. Luis D Alcaraz
  6. Luis E Eguiarte
  7. Janet L Siefert
  8. Valeria Souza
  9. Chris L Dupont
  10. James J Elser
  1. Arizona State University, United States
  2. USDA, United States
  3. J Craig Venter Institute, United States
  4. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
  5. Rice University, United States
  6. University of Montana, United States

Abstract

Several universal genomic traits affect trade-offs in the capacity, cost, and efficiency of biochemical information processing underpinning metabolism and reproduction. We analyzed their role in mediating planktonic microbial community responses to nutrient enrichment in an oligotrophic, phosphorus-deficient pond in Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico—one of the first whole-ecosystem experiments involving replicated metagenomic assessment. Mean bacterial genome size, GC content, total number of tRNA genes, total number of rRNA genes, and codon usage bias in ribosomal protein sequences were higher in the fertilized treatment, as predicted assuming oligotrophy favors lower information-processing costs while copiotrophy favors higher processing rates. Contrasting changes in trait variances also suggested differences between traits in mediating assembly under copiotrophic versus oligotrophic conditions. Trade-offs in information-processing traits are apparently sufficiently pronounced to play a role in community assembly as the major components of metabolism—information, energy, and nutrient requirements—are fine-tuned to an organism's growth and trophic strategy.

Data availability

Raw sequence data and metadata have been submitted to NCBI Sequence Read Archives, accessible through BioProject PRJEB22811.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jordan G Okie

    School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, United States
    For correspondence
    jordan.okie@asu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7884-7688
  2. Amisha T Poret-Peterson

    ARS Crops Pathology and Genetic Research Unit, USDA, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Zarraz MP Lee

    School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexander Richter

    J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Luis D Alcaraz

    Departamento de Biología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3284-0605
  6. Luis E Eguiarte

    Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5906-9737
  7. Janet L Siefert

    Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Valeria Souza

    Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2992-4229
  9. Chris L Dupont

    J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. James J Elser

    Flathead Lake Biological Station, University of Montana, Missoula, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Science Foundation (DEB-0950175)

  • James J Elser

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAI5-0018)

  • James J Elser

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNH05ZDA001C)

  • Janet L Siefert

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Okie et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,690
    views
  • 309
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jordan G Okie
  2. Amisha T Poret-Peterson
  3. Zarraz MP Lee
  4. Alexander Richter
  5. Luis D Alcaraz
  6. Luis E Eguiarte
  7. Janet L Siefert
  8. Valeria Souza
  9. Chris L Dupont
  10. James J Elser
(2020)
Genomic adaptations in information processing underpin trophic strategy in a whole-ecosystem nutrient enrichment experiment
eLife 9:e49816.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49816

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49816

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Ming-Qiang Wang, Shi-Kun Guo ... Chao-Dong Zhu
    Research Article

    Environmental factors can influence ecological networks, but these effects are poorly understood in the realm of the phylogeny of host-parasitoid interactions. Especially, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the ways that biotic factors, including plant species richness, overall community phylogenetic and functional composition of consumers, and abiotic factors such as microclimate, determine host-parasitoid network structure and host-parasitoid community dynamics. To address this, we leveraged a 5-year dataset of trap-nesting bees and wasps and their parasitoids collected in a highly controlled, large-scale subtropical tree biodiversity experiment. We tested for effects of tree species richness, tree phylogenetic, and functional diversity, and species and phylogenetic composition on species and phylogenetic diversity of both host and parasitoid communities and the composition of their interaction networks. We show that multiple components of tree diversity and canopy cover impacted both, species and phylogenetic composition of hosts and parasitoids. Generally, phylogenetic associations between hosts and parasitoids reflected nonrandomly structured interactions between phylogenetic trees of hosts and parasitoids. Further, host-parasitoid network structure was influenced by tree species richness, tree phylogenetic diversity, and canopy cover. Our study indicates that the composition of higher trophic levels and corresponding interaction networks are determined by plant diversity and canopy cover, especially via trophic links in species-rich ecosystems.

    1. Ecology
    Itai Bloch, David Troupin ... Nir Sapir
    Research Article

    Optimal foraging theory posits that foragers adjust their movements based on prey abundance to optimize food intake. While extensively studied in terrestrial and marine environments, aerial foraging has remained relatively unexplored due to technological limitations. This study, uniquely combining BirdScan-MR1 radar and the Advanced Tracking and Localization of Animals in Real-Life Systems biotelemetry system, investigates the foraging dynamics of Little Swifts (Apus affinis) in response to insect movements over Israel’s Hula Valley. Insect movement traffic rate (MoTR) substantially varied across days, strongly influencing swift movement. On days with high MoTR, swifts exhibited reduced flight distance, increased colony visit rate, and earlier arrivals at the breeding colony, reflecting a dynamic response to prey availability. However, no significant effects were observed in total foraging duration, flight speed, or daily route length. Notably, as insect abundance increased, inter-individual distances decreased. These findings suggest that Little Swifts optimize their foraging behavior in relation to aerial insect abundance, likely influencing reproductive success and population dynamics. The integration of radar technology and biotelemetry systems provides a unique perspective on the interactions between aerial insectivores and their prey, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of optimal foraging strategies in diverse environments.