1. Ecology
Download icon

Antagonistic Effects of Intraspecific Cooperation and Interspecific Competition on Thermal Performance

  1. Hsiang-Yu Tsai
  2. Dustin Reid Rubenstein
  3. Bo-Fei Chen
  4. Mark Liu
  5. Shih-Fan Chan
  6. De-Pei Chen
  7. Syuan-Jyun Sun
  8. Tzu-Neng Yuan
  9. Sheng-Feng Shen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, Republic of China
  2. Columbia University, United States
  3. Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Research Article
  • Cited 0
  • Views 903
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e57022 doi: 10.7554/eLife.57022

Abstract

Understanding how climate-mediated biotic interactions shape thermal niche width is critical in an era of global change. Yet, most previous work on thermal niches has ignored detailed mechanistic information about the relationship between temperature and organismal performance, which can be described by a thermal performance curve. Here, we develop a model that predicts the width of thermal performance curves will be narrower in the presence of interspecific competitors, causing a species' optimal breeding temperature to diverge from that of its competitor. We test this prediction in the Asian burying beetle Nicrophorus nepalensis, confirming that the divergence in actual and optimal breeding temperatures is the result of competition with their primary competitor, blowflies. However, we further show that intraspecific cooperation enables beetles to outcompete blowflies by recovering their optimal breeding temperature. Ultimately, linking abiotic factors and biotic interactions on niche width will be critical for understanding species-specific responses to climate change.

Data availability

All data analysed during the study are available in Dryad.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Shen
    2. Sheng-Feng et al
    (2020) Source data for empirical experiments
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.w0vt4b8nw.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hsiang-Yu Tsai

    Biodiversity Research Center, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Dustin Reid Rubenstein

    Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bo-Fei Chen

    Biodiversity Research Center, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3005-8724
  4. Mark Liu

    Biodiversity Research Center, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Shih-Fan Chan

    Biodiversity Research Center, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. De-Pei Chen

    Biodiversity Research Center, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Syuan-Jyun Sun

    Biodiversity Research Center, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Tzu-Neng Yuan

    Biodiversity Research Center, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sheng-Feng Shen

    Biodiversity Research Center, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    For correspondence
    shensf@sinica.edu.tw
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0631-6343

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (103-2621-B-001 -003 -MY3)

  • Sheng-Feng Shen

National Science Foundation (IOS-1656098)

  • Dustin Reid Rubenstein

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (101-2313-B-001 -008 -MY3)

  • Sheng-Feng Shen

Academia Sinica (AS-SS-106-05)

  • Sheng-Feng Shen

Academia Sinica (AS-IA-106-L01)

  • Sheng-Feng Shen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Samuel L Díaz-Muñoz, University of California, Davis, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: March 18, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 28, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 18, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 21, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Tsai et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 903
    Page views
  • 121
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Ecology
    Sylvie Estrela et al.
    Research Article

    A major open question in microbial community ecology is whether we can predict how the components of a diet collectively determine the taxonomic composition of microbial communities. Motivated by this challenge, we investigate whether communities assembled in pairs of nutrients can be predicted from those assembled in every single nutrient alone. We find that although the null, naturally additive model generally predicts well the family-level community composition, there exist systematic deviations from the additive predictions that reflect generic patterns of nutrient dominance at the family level. Pairs of more-similar nutrients (e.g. two sugars) are on average more additive than pairs of more dissimilar nutrients (one sugar–one organic acid). Furthermore, sugar–acid communities are generally more similar to the sugar than the acid community, which may be explained by family-level asymmetries in nutrient benefits. Overall, our results suggest that regularities in how nutrients interact may help predict community responses to dietary changes.

    1. Ecology
    Corey JA Bradshaw et al.
    Research Article Updated

    The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured models for 13 extinct megafauna species from five functional/taxonomic groups, as well as 8 extant species within these groups for comparison. Perturbing specific demographic rates individually, we tested which species were more demographically susceptible to extinction, and then compared these relative sensitivities to the fossil-derived extinction chronology. Our models show that the macropodiformes were the least demographically susceptible to extinction, followed by carnivores, monotremes, vombatiform herbivores, and large birds. Five of the eight extant species were as or more susceptible than the extinct species. There was no clear relationship between extinction susceptibility and the extinction chronology for any perturbation scenario, while body mass and generation length explained much of the variation in relative risk. Our results reveal that the actual mechanisms leading to the observed extinction chronology were unlikely related to variation in demographic susceptibility per se, but were possibly driven instead by finer-scale variation in climate change and/or human prey choice and relative hunting success.