Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks

  1. Ting Tang
  2. Naili Zhang
  3. Franca J Bongers
  4. Michael Staab
  5. Andreas Schuldt
  6. Felix Fornoff
  7. Hong Lin
  8. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
  9. Andrew L Hipp
  10. Shan Li
  11. Yu Liang
  12. Baocai Han
  13. Alexandra-Maria Klein
  14. Helge Bruelheide
  15. Walter Durka
  16. Bernhard Schmid  Is a corresponding author
  17. Keping Ma  Is a corresponding author
  18. Xiaojuan Liu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  2. Beijing Forestry University, China
  3. Technical University Darmstadt, Germany
  4. Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
  5. University of Freiburg, Germany
  6. Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, China
  7. University of Minnesota, United States
  8. Morton Arboretum, United States
  9. Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
  10. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany
  11. University of Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Addressing global biodiversity loss requires an expanded focus on multiple dimensions of biodiversity. While most studies have focused on the consequences of plant interspecific diversity, our mechanistic understanding of how genetic diversity within plant species affects plant productivity remains limited. Here, we use a tree species × genetic diversity experiment to disentangle the effects of species diversity and genetic diversity, and how they are related to tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks. We found that tree species diversity increased tree productivity via increased tree functional diversity, reduced soil fungal diversity and marginally reduced herbivory. The effects of tree genetic diversity on productivity via functional diversity and soil fungal diversity were negative in monocultures but positive in the mixture of the four tree species tested. Given the complexity of interactions between species and genetic diversity, tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks on productivity, we suggest that both tree species and genetic diversity should be considered in afforestation.

Data availability

All numerical data were used to generate the figures that have been deposited in Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ting Tang

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Naili Zhang

    College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Franca J Bongers

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Michael Staab

    Ecological Networks, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Andreas Schuldt

    Forest Nature Conservation, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Felix Fornoff

    Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0446-7153
  7. Hong Lin

    Institute of Applied Ecology, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jeannine Cavender-Bares

    Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Andrew L Hipp

    Morton Arboretum, Lisle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Shan Li

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Yu Liang

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4259-6028
  12. Baocai Han

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Alexandra-Maria Klein

    Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Helge Bruelheide

    Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Walter Durka

    Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Bernhard Schmid

    Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    bernhard.schmid@geo.uzh.ch
    Competing interests
    Bernhard Schmid, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  17. Keping Ma

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    kpma@ibcas.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Xiaojuan Liu

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    liuxiaojuan06@ibcas.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9292-4432

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870409)

  • Ting Tang
  • Franca J Bongers
  • Xiaojuan Liu

Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB31000000)

  • Naili Zhang
  • Xiaojuan Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32161123003)

  • Naili Zhang
  • Yu Liang
  • Keping Ma
  • Xiaojuan Liu

Younth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2019082)

  • Xiaojuan Liu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Tang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,071
    views
  • 492
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ting Tang
  2. Naili Zhang
  3. Franca J Bongers
  4. Michael Staab
  5. Andreas Schuldt
  6. Felix Fornoff
  7. Hong Lin
  8. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
  9. Andrew L Hipp
  10. Shan Li
  11. Yu Liang
  12. Baocai Han
  13. Alexandra-Maria Klein
  14. Helge Bruelheide
  15. Walter Durka
  16. Bernhard Schmid
  17. Keping Ma
  18. Xiaojuan Liu
(2022)
Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks
eLife 11:e78703.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78703

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78703

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Rebecca D Tarvin, Jeffrey L Coleman ... Richard W Fitch
    Research Article

    Understanding the origins of novel, complex phenotypes is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Poison frogs of the family Dendrobatidae have evolved the novel ability to acquire alkaloids from their diet for chemical defense at least three times. However, taxon sampling for alkaloids has been biased towards colorful species, without similar attention paid to inconspicuous ones that are often assumed to be undefended. As a result, our understanding of how chemical defense evolved in this group is incomplete. Here, we provide new data showing that, in contrast to previous studies, species from each undefended poison frog clade have measurable yet low amounts of alkaloids. We confirm that undefended dendrobatids regularly consume mites and ants, which are known sources of alkaloids. Thus, our data suggest that diet is insufficient to explain the defended phenotype. Our data support the existence of a phenotypic intermediate between toxin consumption and sequestration — passive accumulation — that differs from sequestration in that it involves no derived forms of transport and storage mechanisms yet results in low levels of toxin accumulation. We discuss the concept of passive accumulation and its potential role in the origin of chemical defenses in poison frogs and other toxin-sequestering organisms. In light of ideas from pharmacokinetics, we incorporate new and old data from poison frogs into an evolutionary model that could help explain the origins of acquired chemical defenses in animals and provide insight into the molecular processes that govern the fate of ingested toxins.

    1. Ecology
    Mercury Shitindo
    Insight

    Tracking wild pigs with GPS devices reveals how their social interactions could influence the spread of disease, offering new strategies for protecting agriculture, wildlife, and human health.