Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks

  1. Ting Tang
  2. Naili Zhang
  3. Franca J Bongers
  4. Michael Staab
  5. Andreas Schuldt
  6. Felix Fornoff
  7. Hong Lin
  8. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
  9. Andrew L Hipp
  10. Shan Li
  11. Yu Liang
  12. Baocai Han
  13. Alexandra-Maria Klein
  14. Helge Bruelheide
  15. Walter Durka
  16. Bernhard Schmid  Is a corresponding author
  17. Keping Ma  Is a corresponding author
  18. Xiaojuan Liu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  2. Beijing Forestry University, China
  3. Technical University Darmstadt, Germany
  4. Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
  5. University of Freiburg, Germany
  6. Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, China
  7. University of Minnesota, United States
  8. Morton Arboretum, United States
  9. Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
  10. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany
  11. University of Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Addressing global biodiversity loss requires an expanded focus on multiple dimensions of biodiversity. While most studies have focused on the consequences of plant interspecific diversity, our mechanistic understanding of how genetic diversity within plant species affects plant productivity remains limited. Here, we use a tree species × genetic diversity experiment to disentangle the effects of species diversity and genetic diversity, and how they are related to tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks. We found that tree species diversity increased tree productivity via increased tree functional diversity, reduced soil fungal diversity and marginally reduced herbivory. The effects of tree genetic diversity on productivity via functional diversity and soil fungal diversity were negative in monocultures but positive in the mixture of the four tree species tested. Given the complexity of interactions between species and genetic diversity, tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks on productivity, we suggest that both tree species and genetic diversity should be considered in afforestation.

Data availability

All numerical data were used to generate the figures that have been deposited in Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ting Tang

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Naili Zhang

    College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Franca J Bongers

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Michael Staab

    Ecological Networks, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Andreas Schuldt

    Forest Nature Conservation, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Felix Fornoff

    Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0446-7153
  7. Hong Lin

    Institute of Applied Ecology, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jeannine Cavender-Bares

    Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Andrew L Hipp

    Morton Arboretum, Lisle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Shan Li

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Yu Liang

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4259-6028
  12. Baocai Han

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Alexandra-Maria Klein

    Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Helge Bruelheide

    Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Walter Durka

    Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Bernhard Schmid

    Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    bernhard.schmid@geo.uzh.ch
    Competing interests
    Bernhard Schmid, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  17. Keping Ma

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    kpma@ibcas.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Xiaojuan Liu

    Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    liuxiaojuan06@ibcas.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9292-4432

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870409)

  • Ting Tang
  • Franca J Bongers
  • Xiaojuan Liu

Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB31000000)

  • Naili Zhang
  • Xiaojuan Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32161123003)

  • Naili Zhang
  • Yu Liang
  • Keping Ma
  • Xiaojuan Liu

Younth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2019082)

  • Xiaojuan Liu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Tang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,957
    views
  • 476
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ting Tang
  2. Naili Zhang
  3. Franca J Bongers
  4. Michael Staab
  5. Andreas Schuldt
  6. Felix Fornoff
  7. Hong Lin
  8. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
  9. Andrew L Hipp
  10. Shan Li
  11. Yu Liang
  12. Baocai Han
  13. Alexandra-Maria Klein
  14. Helge Bruelheide
  15. Walter Durka
  16. Bernhard Schmid
  17. Keping Ma
  18. Xiaojuan Liu
(2022)
Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks
eLife 11:e78703.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78703

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78703

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Zhixian Zhang, Jianying Li ... Songdou Zhang
    Research Article

    Seasonal polyphenism enables organisms to adapt to environmental challenges by increasing phenotypic diversity. Cacopsylla chinensis exhibits remarkable seasonal polyphenism, specifically in the form of summer-form and winter-form, which have distinct morphological phenotypes. Previous research has shown that low temperature and the temperature receptor CcTRPM regulate the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis by impacting cuticle content and thickness. However, the underling neuroendocrine regulatory mechanism remains largely unknown. Bursicon, also known as the tanning hormone, is responsible for the hardening and darkening of the insect cuticle. In this study, we report for the first time on the novel function of Bursicon and its receptor in the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis. Firstly, we identified CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β as two typical subunits of Bursicon in C. chinensis, which were regulated by low temperature (10 °C) and CcTRPM. Subsequently, CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β formed a heterodimer that mediated the transition from summer-form to winter-form by influencing the cuticle chitin contents and cuticle thickness. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CcBurs-R acts as the Bursicon receptor and plays a critical role in the up-stream signaling of the chitin biosynthesis pathway, regulating the transition from summer-form to winter-form. Finally, we discovered that miR-6012 directly targets CcBurs-R, contributing to the regulation of Bursicon signaling in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis. In summary, these findings reveal the novel function of the neuroendocrine regulatory mechanism underlying seasonal polyphenism and provide critical insights into the insect Bursicon and its receptor.

    1. Ecology
    Ivan Pokrovsky, Teja Curk ... Martin Wikelski
    Research Article

    Advances in tracking technologies have revealed the diverse migration patterns of birds, which are critical for range mapping and population estimation. Population trends are usually estimated in breeding ranges where birds remain stationary, but for species that breed in remote areas like the Arctic, these trends are often assessed in over-wintering ranges. Assessing population trends during the wintering season is challenging due to the extensive movements of birds in these ranges, which requires a deep understanding of the movement dynamics. However, these movements remain understudied, particularly in the mid-latitudes, where many Arctic breeders overwinter, increasing uncertainty in their ranges and numbers. Here, we show that the Arctic breeding raptor Rough-legged buzzard, which overwinters in the mid-latitudes, has a specific wintering strategy. After migrating ca. 1500 km from the Arctic to mid-latitudes, the birds continue to move throughout the entire over-wintering period, traveling another 1000 km southwest and then back northeast as the snowline advances. This continuous movement makes their wintering range dynamic throughout the season. In essence, this movement represents an extension of the quick migration process, albeit at a slower pace, and we have termed this migration pattern ‘foxtrot migration’, drawing an analogy to the alternating fast and slow movements of the foxtrot dance. These results highlight the potential errors in range mapping from single mid-winter surveys and emphasize the importance of this migration pattern in assessing the conservation status of bird species. Understanding this migration pattern could help to correctly estimate bird populations in over-wintering ranges, which is especially important for species that nest in hard-to-reach regions such as the Arctic.