Engineering multifunctional rhizosphere probiotics using consortia of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens transposon insertion mutants

  1. Jingxuan Li
  2. Chunlan Yang
  3. Alexandre Jousset
  4. Keming Yang
  5. Xiaofang Wang
  6. Zhihui Xu
  7. Tianjie Yang
  8. Xinlan Mei
  9. Zengtao Zhong
  10. Yangchun Xu
  11. Qirong Shen
  12. Ville-Petri Friman  Is a corresponding author
  13. Zhong Wei  Is a corresponding author
  1. Nanjing Agricultural University, China
  2. University of Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

While bacterial diversity is beneficial for the functioning of rhizosphere microbiomes, multi-species bioinoculants often fail to promote plant growth. One potential reason for this is that competition between different species of inoculated consortia members creates conflicts for their survival and functioning. To circumvent this, we used transposon insertion mutagenesis to increase the functional diversity within Bacillus amyloliquefaciens bacterial species and tested if we could improve plant growth-promotion by assembling consortia of highly clonal but phenotypically dissimilar mutants. While most insertion mutations were harmful, some significantly improved B. amyloliquefaciens plant growth-promotion traits relative to the wild-type strain. Eight phenotypically distinct mutants were selected to test if their functioning could be improved by applying them as multifunctional consortia. We found that B. amyloliquefaciens consortium richness correlated positively with plant root colonization and protection from Ralstonia solanacearum phytopathogenic bacterium. Crucially, 8-mutant consortium consisting of phenotypically dissimilar mutants performed better than randomly assembled 8-mutant consortia, suggesting that improvements were likely driven by consortia multifunctionality instead of consortia richness. Together, our results suggest that increasing intra-species phenotypic diversity could be an effective way to improve probiotic consortium functioning and plant growth-promotion in agricultural systems.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided in Source data 1

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jingxuan Li

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chunlan Yang

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexandre Jousset

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Keming Yang

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xiaofang Wang

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Zhihui Xu

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3987-8836
  7. Tianjie Yang

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xinlan Mei

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Zengtao Zhong

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yangchun Xu

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Qirong Shen

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Ville-Petri Friman

    Department of Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    For correspondence
    ville-petri.friman@helsinki.fi
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Zhong Wei

    Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    For correspondence
    weizhong@njau.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7967-4897

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1900100)

  • Zhong Wei

Royal Society Research Grants (CHL\R1\180031)

  • Ville-Petri Friman

Strategic Priorities Fund Plant Bacterial Diseases programme (BB/T010606/1)

  • Ville-Petri Friman

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1001804)

  • Xiaofang Wang

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1500202)

  • Tianjie Yang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (42325704)

  • Zhong Wei

National Natural Science Foundation of China (42090064)

  • Qirong Shen

National Natural Science Foundation of China (41922053)

  • Zhong Wei

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972504)

  • Yangchun Xu

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (KYT2023001)

  • Zhong Wei

Royal Society Research Grants (RSG\R1\180213)

  • Ville-Petri Friman

These funders supported study design, data collection and interpretation, and the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Li et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,336
    views
  • 325
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90726

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kathleen T Quach, Gillian A Hughes, Sreekanth H Chalasani
    Research Article

    Prey must balance predator avoidance with feeding, a central dilemma in prey refuge theory. Additionally, prey must assess predatory imminence—how close threats are in space and time. Predatory imminence theory classifies defensive behaviors into three defense modes: pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to increasing levels of threat—–suspecting, detecting, and contacting a predator. Although predatory risk often varies in spatial distribution and imminence, how these factors intersect to influence defensive behaviors is poorly understood. Integrating these factors into a naturalistic environment enables comprehensive analysis of multiple defense modes in consistent conditions. Here, we combine prey refuge and predatory imminence theories to develop a model system of nematode defensive behaviors, with Caenorhabditis elegans as prey and Pristionchus pacificus as predator. In a foraging environment comprised of a food-rich, high-risk patch and a food-poor, low-risk refuge, C. elegans innately exhibits circa-strike behaviors. With experience, it learns post- and pre-encounter behaviors that proactively anticipate threats. These defense modes intensify with predator lethality, with only life-threatening predators capable of eliciting all three modes. SEB-3 receptors and NLP-49 peptides, key stress regulators, vary in their impact and interdependence across defense modes. Overall, our model system reveals fine-grained insights into how stress-related signaling regulates defensive behaviors.

    1. Ecology
    Laura Fargeot, Camille Poesy ... Blanchet Simon
    Research Article

    Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning stands as a cornerstone in ecological research. Extensive evidence now underscores the profound impact of species loss on the stability and dynamics of ecosystem functions. However, it remains unclear whether the loss of genetic diversity within key species yields similar consequences. Here, we delve into the intricate relationship between species diversity, genetic diversity, and ecosystem functions across three trophic levels – primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers – in natural aquatic ecosystems. Our investigation involves estimating species diversity and genome-wide diversity – gauged within three pivotal species – within each trophic level, evaluating seven key ecosystem functions, and analyzing the magnitude of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEFs). We found that, overall, the absolute effect size of genetic diversity on ecosystem functions mirrors that of species diversity in natural ecosystems. We nonetheless unveil a striking dichotomy: while genetic diversity was positively correlated with various ecosystem functions, species diversity displays a negative correlation with these functions. These intriguing antagonist effects of species and genetic diversity persist across the three trophic levels (underscoring its systemic nature), but were apparent only when BEFs were assessed within trophic levels rather than across them. This study reveals the complexity of predicting the consequences of genetic and species diversity loss under natural conditions, and emphasizes the need for further mechanistic models integrating these two facets of biodiversity.