The cerebellum, a key player in both motor and non-motor functions, is a complex structure composed of the cerebellar nuclei (CN) and cerebellar cortex. The CN, the main cerebellar output to the rest of brain, are comprised of at least three distinct neuronal types: glutamatergic, GABAergic, and glycinergic neuron (Koziol et al., 2014; Manto et al., 2012; Marzban et al., 2014). In the mouse, the cerebellar primordium, an early structure in cerebellar development, emerges at approximately embryonic day (E)7–8 from the alar plate of the rhombomere-1 (Kebschull et al., 2024; Goldowitz and Hamre, 1998; Sotelo, 2004; Wang and Zoghbi, 2001; Marzban et al., 2014). The cerebellar primordium is rostrally limited by the isthmus, a boundary between the mesencephalon (midbrain)-rhombencephalon (hindbrain). Two key genes, orthodenticle homeobox 2 (Otx2) and gastrulation brain homeobox 2 (Gbx2), are among the earliest genes expressed in the neuroectoderm, dividing it into anterior and posterior domains with a border that marks the isthmus. Otx2 is crucial for the development of the forebrain and midbrain, while Gbx2 is essential for the anterior hindbrain (Millet et al., 1999). The isthmus, where Otx2 and Gbx2 expression meets, is a multi-signaling center that regulates other genes essential for the early development of both the midbrain and cerebellar primordium (Joyner et al., 2000; Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001).

The cerebellar primordium contains two distinct germinal zones, which are responsible for cerebellar neurogenesis and gliogenesis: the ventrally located ventricular zone (VZ) and dorsally located rhombic lip (RL) (Fink et al., 2006). Early studies on the development of CN indicated that both glutamatergic and GABAergic CN neurons originate from the cerebellar VZ (Voogd and Glickstein, 1998). Further studies highlighted the involvement of the RL as an origin for glutamatergic CN neurons (between E9 and E12) (Fink et al., 2006; Wang and Zoghbi, 2001; Green and Wingate, 2014; Machold and Fishell, 2005; Kebschull et al., 2024). LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A) regulates the development of the glutamatergic CN neurons originating from the RL. It is also expressed in the nuclear transitory zone (NTZ) and is considered to be a marker for the majority of rhombic lip-derived CN neurons in addition to a subset of LMX1A-positive cells that do not originate from the RL migratory stream (Chizhikov et al., 2006; Chizhikov et al., 2010).

Extensive developmental studies have shown that all cerebellar cells are produced sequentially from the VZ and the upper RL (Marzban et al., 2014). In this report, we provide evidence that a subset of CN neurons expressing OTX2, α-synuclein (SNCA), MEIS2, and p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR)/nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) originate from the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium and are positioned in the rostroventral region of the NTZ during early cerebellar development. Our data suggest that the mesencephalon represents a third germinal zone and is the origin of previously unrecognized neurons that contribute to CN formation and development.

In mouse embryos, the earliest neuronal populations, which are located at the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium, are immunopositive for neurofilament-associated antigens (NAA; detected by 3A10 antibody), a marker typically expressed in neuronal somata and axons (Marzban et al., 2008; Marzban et al., 2019; Figure 1). To further explore these cells in the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium at E9, we used an antibody to detect SNCA, which is expressed in CN neurons during embryogenesis (Zhong et al., 2010). We identified SNCA⁺ neurons at the rostral end of the NTZ in the cerebellar primordium (Figure 1E–F and Figure 5—figure supplement 1). At E12, we aimed to determine the location of the SNCA⁺ cells in the cerebellar primordium and compare their position with that of the rhombic lip-derived LMX1A⁺ CN neurons (E10–12) in the NTZ. To perform this, double immunofluorescence labeling of SNCA and LMX1A (Figure 2A–D, medial section and Figure 2E–H, lateral section) showed that an LMX1A⁺ population of CN neurons, originating from the RL, either flanks SNCA⁺ neurons in the medial section (Figure 2A–D) or is located dorsally in the lateral section (Figure 2E–H) in the NTZ. This indicates that SCNA⁺ cells are a distinct cell population different from rhombic lip-derived LMX1A⁺ cells. To further explore the characteristics of SNCA⁺ cells, we wanted to determine whether these cells originate from the mesencephalon. OTX2, which is highly expressed in the mesencephalon, has its caudal limit at the boundary of the rhombencephalon (i.e. the isthmus) (Kurokawa et al., 2004), thus makes it an appropriate marker for identifying mesencephalon-derived cells. Interestingly, results from double immunofluorescence experiments in sagittal sections of E12 cerebella showed that OTX2 was highly expressed in the mesencephalon (Figure 3A and B), and was co-expressed with SNCA⁺ cells in the rostral region of the cerebellar primordium (Figure 3A–E). This result suggests that SNCA⁺ cells originate from the mesencephalon. Next, we used quantitative flow cytometry analysis (FCM) to determine whether OTX2⁺ cells co-express SNCA and/or LMX1A (Figure 3F and G). An increase in the number of OTX2- and SNCA-positive cells (but not LMX1A) was observed at E14 in comparison to E12 (*p<0.05). Interestingly, the majority of neural cells were not SNCA⁺/LMX1A⁺, consistent with our IHC findings, or SNCA⁺/OTX2⁺, with the exception of a few cells that did show co-labeling. Of note, more SNCA⁺/OTX2⁺ than SNCA⁺/LMX1A⁺ cells were detected at E12 compared to E14, indicating the co-expression of these markers at different time point during cerebellar development. An increase in the OTX2 expression at the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium was also confirmed by the IHC at E12–15 (Figure 4A–F). The total number of OTX2⁺ cells in the cerebellar primordium sections was counted from E12 to E15 (Figure 4G) and comparison between these embryonic stages indicated a slight increase in the number of OTX2⁺ cells between E12 and E15. Significant differences were observed between E12 and E14 (**p<0.01), E12 and E15 (***p<0.001), as well as E13 and E15 (#p<0.05).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3—source data 1

The content of this file is original FACS data for Figure 3F.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/93778/elife-93778-fig3-data1-v1.pdf

Download elife-93778-fig3-data1-v1.pdf

Figure 3—source data 2

The content of this file is used for Figure 3G.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/93778/elife-93778-fig3-data2-v1.zip

Download elife-93778-fig3-data2-v1.zip

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

To further confirm the presence of OTX2⁺ cells in the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium, we used Otx2-GFP transgenic mice and performed double immunofluorescence labeling with OTX2 and GFP on E13 sections (Figure 5). Results showed that an extension of OTX2-GFP-positive cells, highly prevalent in the mesencephalon, crossed the isthmus and terminated in the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium in the NTZ (Figure 5B, C, and D). To further validate our observations, we employed RNAscope fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) at E12 to detect the presence of Otx2 mRNA in the cerebellar primordium (Figure 5E–J). Otx2 mRNA was highly expressed in the mesencephalon and caudally extended to the rostral cerebellar primordium in the NTZ (Figure 5E–J and Figure 5—figure supplement 1).

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

To evaluate whether OTX2⁺ cells are present in the absence of Snca gene expression, we used Pap^-/-; Snca^-/- mice. OTX2 immunoperoxidase staining showed that even in the absence of Snca expression, OTX2⁺ cells still terminated in the rostral cerebellar primordium (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). This indicates that the expression of Otx2 in these cells is independent of SNCA. We previously reported that NGFR (p75NTR; Ngfr), a neuronal proliferation and differentiation marker, was expressed in the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium in Pap^-/-; Snca^-/- mice (Jiang et al., 2009; Bernabeu and Longo, 2010; Dechant and Barde, 2002; Rahimi-Balaei et al., 2019). To determine whether SNCA⁺ neurons are p75NTR immunopositive, double immunolabeling with SNCA and p75NTR revealed that SNCA⁺ cells in the NTZ exhibited cell membrane expression of p75NTR (Figure 6A–D). This data was further confirmed by western blot analysis of SNCA and p75NTR protein expression in embryonic cerebellar lysates (E11, E13, and E15; Figure 6D). In addition, to conclusively determine that p75NTR is expressed in the membranes of SNCA⁺ cells, we utilized primary dissociated cultures of cerebellum at E10, days in vitro (DIV) 4 (Figure 6E–H). IHC demonstrated that p75NTR was indeed expressed in the membranes of SNCA⁺ cells (with punctate appearance, Figure 6E–H; Dechant and Barde, 2002).

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Figure 6—source data 1

This file has the original scan of western blot bands used for Figure 6D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/93778/elife-93778-fig6-data1-v1.tif

Download elife-93778-fig6-data1-v1.tif

Figure 6—source data 2

The content of this file is showing replicates of western blot finding, supporting Figure 6D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/93778/elife-93778-fig6-data2-v1.zip

Download elife-93778-fig6-data2-v1.zip

Atonal BHLH transcription factor 1 (ATOH1) plays a crucial role in regulating the development of glutamatergic CN neurons derived from the RL at E12, prior to the formation of other rhombic lip-derived cells (granule cells and unipolar brush cells) (Ben-Arie et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2005). To determine whether OTX2 and SNCA immunopositive cells exist in the absence of rhombic lip-derived CN neurons, we used Atoh1^-/- mice (Figure 7A–C). Immunostaining revealed the presence of SNCA⁺ and OTX2⁺ cells at the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium at E12, which reveals this cell population has no RL origin. To validate our findings, we evaluated MEIS2, a transcription factor typically expressed in the NTZ and glutamatergic CN neurons (Willett et al., 2019), in Atoh1^+/+ and Atoh1^-/- cerebellar sections at E12. Notably, our results showed the presence of two distinct sets of MEIS2⁺ cells in the NTZ of Atoh1^+/+ embryos: (1) rhombic lip-derived CN neurons located in the caudodorsal region, which do not express SNCA (MEIS2⁺/SNCA^-), and (2) a subset of MEIS2⁺/SNCA⁺ CN neurons situated in the rostroventral region of the NTZ (Figure 7D–I). In Atoh1^-/- sections, MEIS2⁺/SNCA⁺ cells were still present in the rostroventral region of the NTZ, whereas the subpopulation of MEIS2⁺/SNCA^- rhombic lip-derived CN neurons was absent in the caudodorsal region of the NTZ (Figure 7J–O).

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

To explore if the rostroventral subset of CN neurons derived from an external cerebellar germinal zone, possibly the mesencephalon, we utilized FAST DiI as a neuronal tracer to mark cells within a potential source region. FAST DiI was applied to the dorsum of the caudal mesencephalon at E9, where it was maintained for 4 days (Figure 8A, a). At DIV 4, cells stained with DiI in the dorsum of the mesencephalon were present in both rostral (Figure 8B) and caudal (Figure 8C) directions. Sections from the cerebellar primordium revealed the presence of DiI-labeled cells within the cultured embryo (Figure 8—figure supplement 1). To investigate the earliest DiI-positive cell population in the mesencephalon and avoid unwanted cell staining due to long DiI exposure, we focused on early cerebellar development at E9; it has been reported that one of the premier neuronal populations in the CNS is present at this time in the mesencephalon and projects caudally (Stainier and Gilbert, 1990; Easter et al., 1993). To determine if an early generation of mesencephalic DiI-labeled cells is present within the cerebellar primordium, we limited cellular DiI exposure to only 24 hr (Figure 8D, d), after which it was removed (Figure 8—figure supplement 2). Intriguingly, almost all DiI⁺ cells migrated caudally and presented in the cerebellar primordium (Figure 8E, e and Figure 8—figure supplement 2). DiI staining was clear and strong in cells as shown in Figure 8, Figure 8—figure supplement 1; Figure 2 (arrowhead); it should be noted, however, that some DiI staining was evident in other cells in the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium, although the signal appeared relatively weak (Figure 8—figure supplement 2).

Figure 8 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Previously, it was commonly held that all CN neurons had a singular origin in the VZ (Pierce, 1975; Miale and Sidman, 1961). However, recent discoveries have challenged this notion, revealing a dual origin for CN neurons. Some originate from the VZ, while others arise from the RL (Wang and Zoghbi, 2001; Wang et al., 2005; Ben-Arie et al., 1997). Genetic fate mapping further suggested that glutamatergic CN projection neurons may arise from the RL (Ben-Arie et al., 1997; Machold and Fishell, 2005; Fink et al., 2006). Transcription factor expression patterns indicate that CN neurons migrate from the RL to the NTZ through a subpial stream pathway, while sequentially expressing the genes Lmx1a, Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 (Fink et al., 2006).

In this study, we characterized a subset of CN neurons that do not originate from the cerebellar primordium germinal zones (RL and VZ) during early cerebellar development. We demonstrated a newly identified subset of CN neurons, which are SNCA⁺/OTX2⁺/MEIS2⁺/p75NTR⁺/LMX1A^-, in the rostroventral region of the NTZ of the cerebellar primordium. This suggests the existence of a new germinal zone during cerebellar neurogenesis.

The exact origin of the SNCA⁺/OTX2⁺/MEIS2⁺/p75NTR⁺/LMX1A^- CN neurons is currently unclear; however, they do not originate from the RL or VZ. RL-derived TBR1⁺/LMX1A⁺ CN neurons are born at E9, but do not reach the NTZ until ~E11 (Kebschull et al., 2024; Machold and Fishell, 2005; Wang et al., 2005; Manto et al., 2012; Fink et al., 2006; Rahimi-Balaei et al., 2018). Our results revealed that SNCA⁺ cells are a group of differentiating neurons (NAA 3A10⁺) present in the NTZ at E9, before the arrival of any neurons that originate from the RL. The majority of SNCA⁺ CN neurons are not LMX1A⁺; however, a small proportion of cells seems to exhibit co-expression. This suggests that in the early stages of CN neurogenesis, the pattern of protein expression in SNCA⁺ neurons may be changing, possibly with respective down- and upregulation of Snca and Lmx1a. Conversely, this may not occur at all, and ‘co-labeling’ could have been observed due to overlapping cells. A similar display of SNCA expression has recently been demonstrated in oligodendrocyte development and maturation (Djelloul et al., 2015). Our findings indicated that CN neuron somata are highly positive for SNCA until E14, after which SNCA expression is refined to Purkinje cells at P0 (Zhong et al., 2010) and axonal projections, suggesting that SNCA⁺ cells at the rostral end of the cerebellar primordium are associated with CN establishment in the NTZ. Our results from studies using Pap^-/-; Snca^-/- mice showed that lack of SNCA during cerebellar development did not affect the formation of rostroventral subset of CN neurons (Rahimi-Balaei et al., 2019), which still expressed OTX2 and terminated in the NTZ. While our comprehensive fate mapping study of SNCA-expressing CN neurons is still in progress, previous research has documented SNCA expression in the medial CN neurons of adult mice. (Fujita et al., 2020). Excitatory CN neurons were previously classified into two main types. However, recent research has further subdivided these neurons into spatially distinct subpopulations within each CN (Kebschull et al., 2024; Krishnamurthy et al., 2024). Specifically, excitatory neurons in the medial CN have been divided into four subpopulations based on the expression of three marker proteins, including SNCA (Fujita et al., 2020). Notably, SNCA⁺ neurons are predominantly located ventrally in the caudal medial CN. Further studies using mice with mutations in En1 and En2, which are crucial for regulating the function of the isthmic organizer, have demonstrated a loss of a subpopulation of excitatory neurons in the medial CN (Krishnamurthy et al., 2024). This finding suggests that the early SNCA⁺ subpopulation may consist of excitatory neurons that did not originate from the RL.

Furthermore, our observations reveal the expression of MEIS2 in the NTZ (Figure 7) and as it is shown previously (Morales and Hatten, 2006). The existance of discrete subpopulations of precursors within the CN is observed by expression of several NTZ markers such as MEIS2 (shown in Figure 7) MEIS1, POU3F1, BRN2, and IRX3 as documented in Kebschull et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2022 and c-Ret and Tlx3 shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1, indicating the existence of discrete subpopulations of precursors within the CN. MEIS2 (homeobox transcription regulator) is expressed in the mesencephalic alar plate of both mice (Cecconi et al., 1997) and chicks (Agoston and Schulte, 2009; Bobak et al., 2009). MEIS2 plays a crucial role in the development of cranial nerves and craniofacial structures (Machon et al., 2015). It has been suggested that mesencephalon development is regulated by Meis2 cross-talk with Otx2 (Agoston and Schulte, 2009). Notably, the expression of MEIS2 in CN neurons is remarkably distinct, allowing for a clear demarcation of the caudodorsal (SNCA^-/MEIS2⁺) and rostroventral (SNCA⁺/MEIS2⁺) regions of the NTZ, whether originating from the RL or not (Figure 7D–I). CN neurons derived from the RL require ATOH1 expression, as they are absent in an Atoh1-null mutant (Wang et al., 2005; Machold and Fishell, 2005; Zordan et al., 2008; Florio et al., 2012; Ben-Arie et al., 1997). In the Atoh1-null cerebellar primordium, the caudodorsal (SNCA^-/MEIS2⁺) subset of CN is absent in the NTZ, while the rostroventral (SNCA⁺/MEIS2⁺) population is still present, indicating that the Meis2⁺ rostroventral subset of the CN in the NTZ develops independently from Atoh1 (Figure 9).

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

What are the potential origins of SNCA⁺/OTX2⁺/MEIS2⁺/p75NTR⁺/LMX1A^- cells in the NTZ during the early stages of cerebellar development? Our study suggests that the origin of these cells may be guided by a continuous flow of rostroventral cells toward the rostral end (mesencephalon), and caudodorsal cells toward the caudal end (RL) of the cerebellar primordium. It is well established that Otx2 is required for the development of the fore- and midbrain, while Gbx2 is necessary for anterior hindbrain development (Simeone et al., 1992; Alvarado-Mallart, 2005; Li and Joyner, 2001; Joyner et al., 2000). The expression of OTX2 in the rostral and GBX2 in the caudal neural tube is considered limited to the isthmus (Alvarado-Mallart, 2005). However, a study by Martinez et al. on chick/quail chimeras determined that the rostral portion of the cerebellar primordium is located more rostrally in the so-called ‘mesencephalic’ alar plate (Martinez and Alvarado-Mallart, 1989). Recently, Isl1-positive cells in the anterior cerebellum were shown to exhibit residual OTX2 protein activity (Wizeman et al., 2019). Several other studies have shown that rostral cerebellar development is associated with factors expressed in the caudal mesencephalon, such as engrailed family En1 and -2 (Joyner et al., 1991; Hanks et al., 1995; Millen et al., 1995), and Acp2 (Bailey et al., 2013; Bailey et al., 2014), which are regulated by the multi-signaling center known as the isthmic organizer (Martinez et al., 2013). Furthermore, by employing embryonic cultures in conjunction with DiI labeling, we determined that the source of the rostroventral subset of CN neurons appears to be an external cerebellar germinal zone, possibly originating from the mesencephalon, which is in line with other studies (Nichols and Bruce, 2006; Wizeman et al., 2019). While our current study hints at the possibility of the caudal mesencephalon serving as a novel extrinsic germinal zone for the cerebellar primordium, further investigation is required. Genetic inducible fate mapping and long-term follow-up studies are essential to gain a comprehensive understanding of the origin, fate, and connectivity of, as well as the role played by the SNCA⁺/ OTX2⁺/MEIS2⁺/p75NTR⁺/LMX1A^- rostroventral subset of CN neurons in the development of the cerebellum.

In conclusion, our study indicates that the SNCA⁺/OTX2⁺/MEIS2⁺/p75NTR⁺/LMX1A^- rostroventral subset of CN neurons do not originate from the well-known distinct germinative zones of the cerebellar primordium. Instead, our findings suggest the existence of a previously unidentified extrinsic germinal zone, potentially the mesencephalon.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

1. 1. Agoston Z
   2. Schulte D

   (2009) Meis2 competes with the Groucho co-repressor Tle4 for binding to Otx2 and specifies tectal fate without induction of a secondary midbrain-hindbrain boundary organizer

   Development 136:3311–3322.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.037770

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Alvarado-Mallart RM

   (2005) The chick/quail transplantation model: discovery of the isthmic organizer center

   Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews 49:109–113.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.03.001

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Bailey K
   2. Rahimi Balaei M
   3. Mehdizadeh M
   4. Marzban H

   (2013) Spatial and temporal expression of lysosomal acid phosphatase 2 (ACP2) reveals dynamic patterning of the mouse cerebellar cortex

   Cerebellum 12:870–881.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0502-y

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bailey K
   2. Rahimi Balaei M
   3. Mannan A
   4. Del Bigio MR
   5. Marzban H

   (2014) Purkinje cell compartmentation in the cerebellum of the lysosomal Acid phosphatase 2 mutant mouse (nax - naked-ataxia mutant mouse)

   PLOS ONE 9:e94327.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094327

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Ben-Arie N
   2. Bellen HJ
   3. Armstrong DL
   4. McCall AE
   5. Gordadze PR
   6. Guo Q
   7. Matzuk MM
   8. Zoghbi HY

   (1997) Math1 is essential for genesis of cerebellar granule neurons

   Nature 390:169–172.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/36579

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bernabeu RO
   2. Longo FM

   (2010) The p75 neurotrophin receptor is expressed by adult mouse dentate progenitor cells and regulates neuronal and non-neuronal cell genesis

   BMC Neuroscience 11:136.

   https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-136

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bobak N
   2. Agoston Z
   3. Schulte D

   (2009) Evidence against involvement of Bmp receptor 1b signaling in fate specification of the chick mesencephalic alar plate at HH16

   Neuroscience Letters 461:223–228.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.003

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Cecconi F
   2. Proetzel G
   3. Alvarez-Bolado G
   4. Jay D
   5. Gruss P

   (1997) Expression ofMeis2, aKnotted-related murine homeobox gene, indicates a role in the differentiation of the forebrain and the somitic mesoderm

   Developmental Dynamics 210:184–190.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199710)210:2<184::AID-AJA10>3.0.CO;2-E

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Chizhikov V
   2. Steshina E
   3. Roberts R
   4. Ilkin Y
   5. Washburn L
   6. Millen KJ

   (2006) Molecular definition of an allelic series of mutations disrupting the mouse Lmx1a (dreher) gene

   Mammalian Genome 17:1025–1032.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-006-0033-7

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Chizhikov VV
    2. Lindgren AG
    3. Mishima Y
    4. Roberts RW
    5. Aldinger KA
    6. Miesegaes GR
    7. Currle DS
    8. Monuki ES
    9. Millen KJ

    (2010) Lmx1a regulates fates and location of cells originating from the cerebellar rhombic lip and telencephalic cortical hem

    PNAS 107:10725–10730.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910786107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Dechant G
    2. Barde YA

    (2002) The neurotrophin receptor p75(NTR): novel functions and implications for diseases of the nervous system

    Nature Neuroscience 5:1131–1136.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1102-1131

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Djelloul M
    2. Holmqvist S
    3. Boza-Serrano A
    4. Azevedo C
    5. Yeung MS
    6. Goldwurm S
    7. Frisén J
    8. Deierborg T
    9. Roybon L

    (2015) Alpha-synuclein expression in the oligodendrocyte lineage: an in vitro and in vivo study using rodent and human models

    Stem Cell Reports 5:174–184.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.07.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Easter SS Jr
    2. Ross LS
    3. Frankfurter A

    (1993) Initial tract formation in the mouse brain

    The Journal of Neuroscience 13:285–299.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-01-00285.1993

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Fink AJ
    2. Englund C
    3. Daza RAM
    4. Pham D
    5. Lau C
    6. Nivison M
    7. Kowalczyk T
    8. Hevner RF

    (2006) Development of the deep cerebellar nuclei: transcription factors and cell migration from the rhombic lip

    The Journal of Neuroscience 26:3066–3076.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5203-05.2006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Florio M
    2. Leto K
    3. Muzio L
    4. Tinterri A
    5. Badaloni A
    6. Croci L
    7. Zordan P
    8. Barili V
    9. Albieri I
    10. Guillemot F
    11. Rossi F
    12. Consalez GG

    (2012) Neurogenin 2 regulates progenitor cell-cycle progression and Purkinje cell dendritogenesis in cerebellar development

    Development 139:2308–2320.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.075861

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Fossat N
    2. Le Greneur C
    3. Béby F
    4. Vincent S
    5. Godement P
    6. Chatelain G
    7. Lamonerie T

    (2007) A new GFP-tagged line reveals unexpected Otx2 protein localization in retinal photoreceptors

    BMC Developmental Biology 7:122.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-7-122

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Fujita H
    2. Kodama T
    3. du Lac S

    (2020) Modular output circuits of the fastigial nucleus for diverse motor and nonmotor functions of the cerebellar vermis

    eLife 9:e58613.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58613

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Goldowitz D
    2. Hamre K

    (1998) The cells and molecules that make a cerebellum

    Trends in Neurosciences 21:375–382.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01313-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Green MJ
    2. Wingate RJT

    (2014) Developmental origins of diversity in cerebellar output nuclei

    Neural Development 9:1.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-9-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Hanks M
    2. Wurst W
    3. Anson-Cartwright L
    4. Auerbach AB
    5. Joyner AL

    (1995) Rescue of the En-1 mutant phenotype by replacement of En-1 with En-2

    Science 269:679–682.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7624797

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Hokin MR
    2. Hokin LE

    (1959)

    The synthesis of phosphatidic acid from diglyceride and adenosine triphosphate in extracts of brain microsomes

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 234:1381–1386.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Jiang X
    2. Gwye Y
    3. McKeown SJ
    4. Bronner-Fraser M
    5. Lutzko C
    6. Lawlor ER

    (2009) Isolation and characterization of neural crest stem cells derived from in vitro-differentiated human embryonic stem cells

    Stem Cells and Development 18:1059–1070.

    https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2008.0362

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Joyner AL
    2. Herrup K
    3. Auerbach BA
    4. Davis CA
    5. Rossant J

    (1991) Subtle cerebellar phenotype in mice homozygous for a targeted deletion of the En-2 homeobox

    Science 251:1239–1243.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1672471

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Joyner AL
    2. Liu A
    3. Millet S

    (2000) Otx2, Gbx2 and Fgf8 interact to position and maintain a mid-hindbrain organizer

    Current Opinion in Cell Biology 12:736–741.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00161-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Kebschull JM
    2. Casoni F
    3. Consalez GG
    4. Goldowitz D
    5. Hawkes R
    6. Ruigrok TJH
    7. Schilling K
    8. Wingate R
    9. Wu J
    10. Yeung J
    11. Uusisaari MY

    (2024) Cerebellum lecture: the cerebellar nuclei-core of the cerebellum

    Cerebellum 23:620–677.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-022-01506-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Koziol LF
    2. Budding D
    3. Andreasen N
    4. D’Arrigo S
    5. Bulgheroni S
    6. Imamizu H
    7. Ito M
    8. Manto M
    9. Marvel C
    10. Parker K
    11. Pezzulo G
    12. Ramnani N
    13. Riva D
    14. Schmahmann J
    15. Vandervert L
    16. Yamazaki T

    (2014) Consensus paper: the cerebellum’s role in movement and cognition

    Cerebellum 13:151–177.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0511-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Krishnamurthy A
    2. Lee AS
    3. Bayin NS
    4. Stephen DN
    5. Nasef O
    6. Lao Z
    7. Joyner AL

    (2024) Engrailed transcription factors direct excitatory cerebellar neuron diversity and survival

    Development 151:dev202502.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.202502

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Kurokawa D
    2. Kiyonari H
    3. Nakayama R
    4. Kimura-Yoshida C
    5. Matsuo I
    6. Aizawa S

    (2004) Regulation of Otx2 expression and its functions in mouse forebrain and midbrain

    Development 131:3319–3331.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01220

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Li JY
    2. Joyner AL

    (2001) Otx2 and Gbx2 are required for refinement and not induction of mid-hindbrain gene expression

    Development 128:4979–4991.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.128.24.4979

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Machold R
    2. Fishell G

    (2005) Math1 is expressed in temporally discrete pools of cerebellar rhombic-lip neural progenitors

    Neuron 48:17–24.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.028

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Machon O
    2. Masek J
    3. Machonova O
    4. Krauss S
    5. Kozmik Z

    (2015) Meis2 is essential for cranial and cardiac neural crest development

    BMC Developmental Biology 15:40.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12861-015-0093-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. Book

    1. Manto M
    2. Gruol DL
    3. Schmahmann JD
    4. Koibuchi N
    5. Rossi F

    (2012) Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders

    New York: Springer.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1333-8

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Martinez S
    2. Alvarado-Mallart RM

    (1989) Rostral cerebellum originates from the caudal portion of the so-called “Mesencephalic” vesicle: a study using chick/quail chimeras

    The European Journal of Neuroscience 1:549–560.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00362.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Martinez S
    2. Andreu A
    3. Mecklenburg N
    4. Echevarria D

    (2013) Cellular and molecular basis of cerebellar development

    Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 7:18.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2013.00018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Marzban H
    2. Khanzada U
    3. Shabir S
    4. Hawkes R
    5. Langnaese K
    6. Smalla KH
    7. Bockers TM
    8. Gundelfinger ED
    9. Gordon-Weeks PR
    10. Beesley PW

    (2003) Expression of the immunoglobulin superfamily neuroplastin adhesion molecules in adult and developing mouse cerebellum and their localisation to parasagittal stripes

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 462:286–301.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10719

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Marzban H
    2. Hawkes R

    (2007) Fibroblast growth factor promotes the development of deep cerebellar nuclear neurons in dissociated mouse cerebellar cultures

    Brain Research 1141:25–36.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.031

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Marzban H
    2. Kim CT
    3. Doorn D
    4. Chung SH
    5. Hawkes R

    (2008) A novel transverse expression domain in the mouse cerebellum revealed by A neurofilament-associated antigen

    Neuroscience 153:1190–1201.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.02.036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Marzban H
    2. Del Bigio MR
    3. Alizadeh J
    4. Ghavami S
    5. Zachariah RM
    6. Rastegar M

    (2014) Cellular commitment in the developing cerebellum

    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 8:450.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00450

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Marzban H
    2. Rahimi-Balaei M
    3. Hawkes R

    (2019) Early trigeminal ganglion afferents enter the cerebellum before the Purkinje cells are born and target the nuclear transitory zone

    Brain Structure and Function 224:2421–2436.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01916-7

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Miale IL
    2. Sidman RL

    (1961) An autoradiographic analysis of histogenesis in the mouse cerebellum

    Experimental Neurology 4:277–296.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(61)90055-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Millen KJ
    2. Hui CC
    3. Joyner AL

    (1995) A role for En-2 and other murine homologues of Drosophila segment polarity genes in regulating positional information in the developing cerebellum

    Development 121:3935–3945.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.121.12.3935

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Millet S
    2. Campbell K
    3. Epstein DJ
    4. Losos K
    5. Harris E
    6. Joyner AL

    (1999) A role for Gbx2 in repression of Otx2 and positioning the mid/hindbrain organizer

    Nature 401:161–164.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/43664

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Morales D
    2. Hatten ME

    (2006) Molecular markers of neuronal progenitors in the embryonic cerebellar anlage

    The Journal of Neuroscience 26:12226–12236.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3493-06.2006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Nichols DH
    2. Bruce LL

    (2006) Migratory routes and fates of cells transcribing the Wnt-1 gene in the murine hindbrain

    Developmental Dynamics 235:285–300.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20611

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Pierce ET

    (1975) Histogenesis of the deep cerebellar nuclei in the mouse: an autoradiographic study

    Brain Research 95:503–518.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(75)90124-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Rahimi Balaei M
    2. Jiao X
    3. Ashtari N
    4. Afsharinezhad P
    5. Ghavami S
    6. Marzban H

    (2016) Cerebellar expression of the neurotrophin receptor p75 in naked-ataxia mutant mouse

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17:115.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17010115

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Rahimi-Balaei M
    2. Bergen H
    3. Kong J
    4. Marzban H

    (2018) Neuronal migration du migration during development of the cerebring development of the cerebellum

    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 12:484.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00484

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Rahimi-Balaei M
    2. Buchok M
    3. Vihko P
    4. Parkinson FE
    5. Marzban H

    (2019) Loss of prostatic acid phosphatase and α-synuclein cause motor circuit degeneration without altering cerebellar patterning

    PLOS ONE 14:e0222234.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222234

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Shabanipour S
    2. Dalvand A
    3. Jiao X
    4. Rahimi Balaei M
    5. Chung SH
    6. Kong J
    7. Del Bigio MR
    8. Marzban H

    (2019) Primary culture of neurons isolated from embryonic mouse cerebellum

    Journal of Visualized Experiments 01:e60168.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/60168

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Simeone A
    2. Acampora D
    3. Gulisano M
    4. Stornaiuolo A
    5. Boncinelli E

    (1992) Nested expression domains of four homeobox genes in developing rostral brain

    Nature 358:687–690.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/358687a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Sotelo C

    (2004) Cellular and genetic regulation of the development of the cerebellar system

    Progress in Neurobiology 72:295–339.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Stainier DY
    2. Gilbert W

    (1990) Pioneer neurons in the mouse trigeminal sensory system

    PNAS 87:923–927.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.3.923

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Voogd J
    2. Glickstein M

    (1998) The anatomy of the cerebellum

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2:307–313.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01210-8

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Wang VY
    2. Zoghbi HY

    (2001) Genetic regulation of cerebellar development

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2:484–491.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/35081558

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Wang VY
    2. Rose MF
    3. Zoghbi HY

    (2005) Math1 expression redefines the rhombic lip derivatives and reveals novel lineages within the brainstem and cerebellum

    Neuron 48:31–43.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.024

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Willett RT
    2. Bayin NS
    3. Lee AS
    4. Krishnamurthy A
    5. Wojcinski A
    6. Lao Z
    7. Stephen D
    8. Rosello-Diez A
    9. Dauber-Decker KL
    10. Orvis GD
    11. Wu Z
    12. Tessier-Lavigne M
    13. Joyner AL

    (2019) Cerebellar nuclei excitatory neurons regulate developmental scaling of presynaptic Purkinje cell number and organ growth

    eLife 8:e50617.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50617

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Wizeman JW
    2. Guo Q
    3. Wilion EM
    4. Li JY

    (2019) Specification of diverse cell types during early neurogenesis of the mouse cerebellum

    eLife 8:e42388.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42388

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Wu JPH
    2. Yeung J
    3. Rahimi-Balaei M
    4. Wu SR
    5. Zoghbi H
    6. Goldowitz D

    (2022) The transcription factor Pou3f1 sheds light on the development and molecular diversity of glutamatergic cerebellar nuclear neurons in the mouse

    Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 15:921901.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.921901

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Wurst W
    2. Bally-Cuif L

    (2001) Neural plate patterning: upstream and downstream of the isthmic organizer

    Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2:99–108.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/35053516

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Zhong S
    2. Luo X
    3. Chen X
    4. Cai Q
    5. Liu J
    6. Chen X
    7. Yao Z

    (2010) Expression and subcellular location of alpha-synuclein during mouse-embryonic development

    Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology 30:469–482.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-009-9473-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Zordan P
    2. Croci L
    3. Hawkes R
    4. Consalez GG

    (2008) Comparative analysis of proneural gene expression in the embryonic cerebellum

    Developmental Dynamics 237:1726–1735.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21571

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Zylka MJ
    2. Sowa NA
    3. Taylor-Blake B
    4. Twomey MA
    5. Herrala A
    6. Voikar V
    7. Vihko P

    (2008) Prostatic acid phosphatase is an ectonucleotidase and suppresses pain by generating adenosine

    Neuron 60:111–122.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.08.024

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Maryam Rahimi-Balaei

   1. Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, The Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba (CHRIM), Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
   2. Department of Medical Genetics, Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1758-0908

2. Shayan Amiri

   1. Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, The Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba (CHRIM), Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
   2. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Division of Neurodegenerative Disorders, St Boniface Hospital Albrechtsen Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Thomas Lamonerie

   Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Inserm, iBV, Nice, France

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Sih-Rong Wu

   1. University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
   2. Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
   3. Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Huda Y Zoghbi

   1. Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
   2. Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, United States
   3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0700-3349

6. G Giacomo Consalez

   1. Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
   2. Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4594-6273

7. Daniel Goldowitz

   Department of Medical Genetics, Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4756-4017

8. Hassan Marzban

   Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, The Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba (CHRIM), Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   hassan.marzban@umanitoba.ca

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6885-2590

• 583

  views

• 21

  downloads

• 0

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.