X-ray of a female Damaraland mole-rat queen, pregnant with three offspring (highlighted). Image credit: Johnston et al. (CC BY 4.0)
Some social animals are highly cooperative creatures that live in tight-knit colonies. Bees and ants are perhaps the most well-known examples of social insects, while Damaraland mole-rats and naked mole-rats, two rodent species found in southern and eastern Africa, are among the most cooperative mammal species. In these colony-forming animals, only one or a few females reproduce and these fertile females are frequently referred to as “queens”.
When an animal becomes a queen, her body shape can change dramatically to support the demands of high fertility and frequent reproduction. The molecular basis of such changes has been well-described in social insects. However, they are poorly understood in mammals.
To address this knowledge gap, Johnston et al. studied how transitioning to queen status affects bone growth and structural integrity in Damaraland mole-rats, as well as body shape and size. The experiments compared non-breeding female mole-rats with other adult females recently paired with a male to become the sole breeder of a new colony. Johnston et al. also used bone-derived cells grown in the laboratory to assess underlying gene regulatory changes in new queen mole-rats.
Johnston et al. showed that transitioning to the role of queen leads to a cascade of skeletal changes accompanied by shifts in the regulation of genetic pathways linked to bone growth. Queen mole-rats show accelerated growth in the spinal column of their lower back. These bones are called lumbar vertebrae and this likely allows them to have larger litters. However, queen mole-rats also lose bone growth potential in their leg bones and develop thinner thigh bones, which may increase the risk of bone fracture. Therefore, unlike highly social insects, mole-rats do not seem to have escaped the physical costs of intensive reproduction.
This work adds to our understanding of the genes and physical traits that have evolved to support cooperative behaviour in social animals, including differences between insects and mammals. It also shows, with a striking example, how an animal’s genome responds to social cues to produce a diverse range of traits that reflect their designated social role.
