A. Illustration of the hypothesized effect of SF adaptation on pRF size. Low and high SF adaptation decreases the responsiveness (indicated by paler green circles) of neurons having respectively large and small receptive fields, and the consequent pRF size estimations (orange circles) reflect the aggregate of the neurons that are not affected by the adapter (green circles). B. Stimulus sequence of a single trial in the behavioural experiment. The adaptation phase included an adapter stimulus with high or low SF, either in the right or left visual hemifield (only present in adaptation conditions). The test phase consisted of a mid-SF reference stimulus on the adapted side, and a test stimulus on the non-adapted side, which varied in SF, subject to two interleaved adaptive staircases. An empty display was shown until the participant responded. Participants were required to maintain their fixation on the dot at the center at all times and judge the relative SF of the two stimuli shown in the test phase. SF: spatial frequency.

A. Psychometric functions for a representative subject. The x-axis represents the log-transformed SF ratio (test/reference SF), where negative values indicate a decrease and positive values indicate an increase in perceived SF. The y-axis represents the proportion of trials participants perceived the test stimuli as having a higher SF. B. Log transformed SF ratios (perceived/actual) of all participants across three adaptation conditions. Coloured circles represent the average of left and right adaptation conditions for each participant, and the gray diamonds show the group average. Positive values on the y-axis denote perceptual overestimation of SF, while negatives denote the underestimation of SF. Un-shaded circles indicate the participants who were not included in the fMRI arm of the study. Circle sizes are proportional to the number of sessions completed. SF: spatial frequency.

Stimulus sequence of a pRF mapping run. Scans started with a baseline period, showing an empty gray display. This was followed by the initial adaptation period. Adaptation consisted of two noise stimuli on both visual hemifields, having different SFs (in this case, high SF was on the left and low SF was on the right, e.g. HL configuration). During the mapping sequence, mid-SF bars swept the screen step by step, in eight directions. Two blank phases were presented in the middle of eight bar directions and also at the end of the mapping sequence. Each mapping component (bars and blanks) was preceded by a short top-up adaptation stimulus, consistently in all volumes throughout the mapping phase. Finally, the runs were concluded with another baseline. All noise stimuli were refreshed at 20 Hz, and a central fixation point persisted throughout. Participants pressed a key upon a color change in the fixation.

Polar angle (A), eccentricity (B), and pRF size (C) maps for the left hemisphere of representative participant, on a spherical model of the gray-white matter boundary. The maps were plotted after the data were denoised, so that only the vertices above the noise threshold would be shown (see text for details of denoising). The first row shows the maps from high-SF adapted condition, and the second row shows those from low-SF adapted condition; annotated as High and Low, respectively. Color charts of each map type are shown on the bottom row. Polar angle maps in column A show the angle from the fixation point. e.g. orange represents the vertical center of the upper visual hemifield. The eccentricity maps in column B show the distance from the fixation point, from 0° to 8° of visual angle, represented by the range of colors from black to white (inner to outer parts of the eccentricity color wheel). pRF size maps in column C show the standard deviation (sigma) values of the Gaussian pRF profile. Magenta indicates the pRF sizes that are closer to zero, and cyan shows pRF sizes greater than or equal to 2° of visual angle. White lines on the maps represent the borders of visual ROIs, delineated using the average of the two conditions. The ROI labels are shown only in the first row of A for simplicity.

A. Median pRF sizes (y-axes) were plotted against low and high SF adaptation conditions (x-axes) for all ROIs (separate plots). Colored circles represent each participant. Filled circles indicate a significant participant-wise median comparison, with FDR corrected p < 0.05. Gray diamonds show the group means. B. Median of eccentricity binned pRF size differences, averaged across participants. pRF size differences were calculated by subtracting the pRF sizes of the low SF adapted condition from those of high SF (H-L). Positive and negative values on the y-axis are related to respectively larger and smaller pRF sizes in the high SF adapted condition. The average of the two conditions was used for eccentricity binning. The shaded area represents the standard error of the mean between participants.

A. Stimulus sequence of a single trial in the control experiment. The adaptation phase is exactly the same as that in the main experiment. In the test phase, the adapted visual hemifield always included a mid-SF, maximum-contrast (100%) stimulus. The stimulus on the non-adapted visual hemifield had a mid-SF; but varied in contrast, subject to two interleaved adaptive staircases. In the response phase, participants were required to indicate the stimulus with relatively high contrast. This sequence was repeated 60 times for each measurement. B. Perceived contrast as a function of SF adaptation condition. Coloured circles represent the average log-transformed PSE values of each participant; gray diamonds indicate the participant average. SF: spatial frequency.

Histogram plots of sigma values for all ROIs (columns) and each participant (rows). Pink and blue bars represent the high and low spatial frequency adapted conditions, respectively. Mood’s median test results were annotated in each plot. The color of the annotation text indicates the condition in which the median pRF sizes were significantly larger. Black in the annotations represents no significant difference between the two conditions. ns: not significant. Note that the p-values here are not corrected. See Figure 5a for corrected p-values.

Log-transformed pRF size ratio between high and low SF adapted conditions (log of H/L) for left and right hemispheres of Participant 002. Hot colors indicate positive numbers, which represent larger pRF sizes in high SF adapted condition as compared to the low SF adapted condition; cold colors indicate the opposite. The brightness of the colors represents the magnitude of the ratios. The brightest pink (or blue) indicates pRF sizes that were at least twice as large in the high (or low) SF condition (loge2 0.7). White lines show the borders of the ROIs. Vertices were thresholded according to the average of two conditions’ normalized goodness of fit, . Transparency changes with respect to the proportion of the average nR2. Vertices shown with opaque colors have the highest average nR2 values. H: High; L:Low

A. Time series of percent signal change for two adaptation conditions in each ROI, averaged across eight participants. Regions were annotated on the right side of each panel. Red and blue lines respectively represent high and low SF adapted conditions. The shaded regions indicate ±1 standard error between the participants. The vertical dashed lines, respectively from left to right, indicate the end of the initial baseline period (volume 25), the end of the initial adaptation period (volume 55), and the start of the final baseline period (volume 305). The volumes between the second and third dashed lines correspond to the mapping sequence. B. Median of eccentricity binned noise ceiling values, averaged across participants. The average of the two conditions was used for eccentricity binning. The shaded area represents the standard error of the mean between participants.

A. Median of eccentricity binned pRF size differences, averaged across participants, using the same set of vertices in two conditions. B. Median of eccentricity binned eccentricity values, averaged across participants. For both A and B, the average of the two adaptation conditions was used for eccentricity selection (x-axes). The shaded regions represent the standard error of the mean between participants.

Log-transformed and bias-corrected SF ratios (perceived/actual SF) were plotted against the adaptation conditions, separately for left and right visual fields. Positive (negative) values of y-axis indicate an increase (decrease) in perceived SF and zero means no perceptual deviation from the actual SF

Distance between the eye position and the fixation point (left) and pupil size (right) plotted against the two adaptation conditions. Colored circles represent each participant and gray diamonds show their mean. The exclamation marks on the legend items denote the participants who were excluded from the statistical analyses.