Figures and data
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig1.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
μGUIDE framework.
μGUIDE takes as input an observed data vector and relies on the definition of a biophysical or computational model [Ascoli et al., 2007, Callaghan et al., 2020, Jelescu et al., 2020]. It outputs a posterior distribution of the model parameters. Based on a SBI framework, it combines a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) with 3 layers and a Neural Posterior Estimator (NPE). The MLP learns a low-dimensional representation of x, based on a small number of features (Nf), that can be either defined a priori or determined empirically during training. The MLP is trained simultaneously with the NPE, leading to the extraction of the optimal features that minimize the bias and uncertainty of p(θ|x).
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig2.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
μGUIDE summarizes information contained in the estimated posterior distributions.
A) Examples of degenerate and non-degenerate posterior distributions. B) Presentation of the measures introduced to quantify a posterior distribution on exemplar non-degenerate posterior distributions. Maximum A Posteriori (MAP): is the most likely parameter estimate (dashed vertical lines). Uncertainty: measures the dispersion of the 50% most probable samples using the interquartile range, with respect to the prior range. Ambiguity: measures the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), in percentage with respect to the prior range.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig3.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Comparison between μGUIDE and MCMC.
A) Posterior distributions obtained using either μGUIDE or MCMC on three exemplar simulations with model 2 (SM - SNR = 50). B) Bias between the ground truth values used for simulating the diffusion signals, and the maximum-a-posteriori extracted from the posterior distributions using either μGUIDE or MCMC. Sharper and less biased posterior distributions are obtained using μGUIDE.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig4.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Fitting accuracy comparison between μGUIDE’s MLP-extracted features and manually-defined summary statistics.
Maximum-A-Posterioris extracted from the posterior distributions vs ground truth parameters used for generating the signal for the three models. Orange points correspond to the MAPs obtained using MLP-extracted features (μGUIDE) and the blue ones to the MAPs with the manually-defined summary statistics. Only the non-degenerate posterior distributions were kept. The summary statistics used in those three models are the direction-averaged signal for the Ball&Stick model, the LEMONADE system of equations [Novikov et al., 2018b] for the SM, and the summary statistics defined in [Jallais et al., 2022] for the extended-SANDI model. Results are shown on 100 exemplar noise-free simulations with random parameter combinations. The optimal features extracted by the MLP allow to reduce the bias and variance of the obtained microstructure posterior distributions.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig5.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Exemplar posterior distributions of the microstructure parameters for the Ball&Stick, SM and extended SANDI models, obtained using μGUIDE on exemplar noise-free simulations.
As the complexity of the model increases, degeneracies appear (red posterior distributions). μGUIDE allows to highlight those degeneracies present in the model definition.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_tbl1.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Number of degenerate cases per parameter on 10000 noise-free simulations.
Training and estimations of the posterior distributions was performed on CPU. Time for training each model and time for estimating posterior distributions of 10000 noise-free simulations, define if they are degenerate or not, and extract the MAP, uncertainty, ambiguity are also reported.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_tbl2.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Number of degenerate cases per parameter on 10000 noisy simulations (Rician noise with SNR = 50).
Training and estimations of the posterior distributions was performed using a GPU. Time for training each model and time for estimating posterior distributions of 10000 noisy simulations, define if they are degenerate or not, and extract the MAP, uncertainty, ambiguity are also reported.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig6.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Parametric maps of the Ball&Stick (top), SM (middle) and extended-SANDI model (bottom), obtained using μGUIDE.
Maximum-a-posteriori estimation, uncertainty and ambiguity measure maps are reported, overlayed with voxels considered degenerate (red dots).
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig7.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Parametric maps of a participant with epilepsy obtained using μGUIDE with the SM, superimposed with the grey matter (black) and white matter (white) lesions segmentation.
Mean values of the maximum-a-posterior, uncertainty and ambiguity measures are reported in the two regions of interest. Lower MAP values are obtained in the lesions for the axonal signal fraction and the orientation dispersion index compared to healthy tissue. Higher uncertainty and ambiguity ODI values are reported, suggesting less stable estimations.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_eqn8.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Model 3: extended-SANDI [Palombo et al., 2020]. This is a three-compartment model (intra-neurite, intra-soma and extra-cellular space) where the dMRI signal from the brain tissue is modelled as a weighted sum of the signal from water diffusing within the neurite space, approximated as sticks with symmetric orientation dispersion following a Watson distribution; water diffusing within cell bodies (namely soma), modelled as restricted diffusion in spheres; and water diffusing within the extra-cellular space, modelled as isotropic Gaussian diffusion. The parameters of interest are the neurite signal fraction fn, the intra-neurite diffusivity Dn, the orientation dispersion index ODI, the extra-cellular signal fraction fe and isotropic diffusivity De, the soma signal fraction fs, and a proxy of soma radius and diffusivity Cs, defined as [Jallais et al., 2022]:
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig8.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Example training set and input signals for μGUIDE.
A) Examples of input synthetic data vectors and corresponding ground truth model parameters used in the training set of Model 1 (Ball&Stick). B) Example of input measured signals from a voxel in a healthy participant, used for inference.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig9.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Correlation matrices between features extracted by the MLP in μGUIDE and manually-defined summary features for the three models.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig10.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Schematic of MADE autoregressive network construction.
![](https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/iiif/2/101069%2Fv1%2F2312.17293%2F2312.17293v3_fig11.tif/full/max/0/default.jpg)
Posterior Predictive Checks.
Comparison between signals xi generated using random parameter combinations and their reconstructions using samples from p(θi|xi).