Therapeutic benefit of combining CDK2i with CDK4/6i and ET.
(A-B) Growth curves of MCF-7 (left) and CAMA-1 (right) cells resistant to palbociclib and fulvestrant under various treatment conditions: drug discontinuation, fulvestrant (500 nM) alone, or in combination with palbociclib (1 µM) and/or INX-315 (100 nM). Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates). P values were calculated with an unpaired t-test (A) and using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc analysis (B) (*P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001). (C) Cell numbers 20 days after drug treatment. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates). P values were calculated using an unpaired t-test (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001). (D) Heatmaps of single-cell traces for CDK4/6 (left) and CDK2 (middle) activities, and Cdt1-degron intensity (right) in palbociclib/fulvestrant resistant MCF-7 cells treated with the triple combination of palbociclib (1 µM), fulvestrant (500 nM), and INX-315 (100 nM) for one week before imaging. Proliferating cells were identified based on CDK2 activity (>1 for more than 2 hr between 30 and 48 hr). (E) Violin plots showing intermitotic time (n > 200 cells/condition) (left) and G1-phase duration (n > 900 cells/condition) (right). Solid and dashed yellow lines indicate mean and median, respectively. (F) Averaged traces of CDK4/6 (left) and CDK2 (right) activities aligned by mitosis in drug-resistant cells treated with the indicated drugs. Data are shown as mean ± 95% confidence intervals (n > 1,000 cells/condition). (G) Heatmaps comparing gene expression profiles for hallmark E2F (left) and MYC (right) targets in drug-resistant MCF-7 cells treated with the indicated drugs for 20 days. Samples were collected as biological duplicates.