Abstract
Background
Huntington’s Disease (HD) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterised by progressive cognitive and motor decline due to atrophy in basal ganglia networks. No disease-modifying therapies exist, but novel clinical trials are ongoing. Non-invasive imaging biomarkers sensitive to HD neuropathology are essential for evaluating therapeutic effects.
Soma and Neurite Density Imaging (SANDI), a multi-shell diffusion-weighted imaging model, estimates intracellular signal fractions from sphere-shaped soma in grey matter. SANDI-derived apparent soma density and size in the striatum have potential as proxies for HD-related neurodegeneration. While HD is rare, it provides a valuable model for other neurodegenerative diseases due to its clear genetic cause and shared features of protein abnormalities.
Objective
To characterise HD-related microstructural abnormalities in the basal ganglia and thalami using SANDI and examine associations between SANDI indices, volumetric measurements, and motor performance.
Methods
T1-weighted anatomical and multi-shell diffusion-weighted images (b-values: 200–6,000 s/mm²) were acquired using a 3T Siemens Connectom scanner (300mT/m) in 56 premanifest and manifest HD individuals (MeanAge = 46.1, SDAge = 13.8, 25 females) and 57 healthy controls (MeanAge = 45.0, SDAge = 13.8, 31 females). HD participants completed Quantitative Motor (Q-Motor) tasks, including speeded and paced finger tapping, which were reduced to one principal component of motor performance. Following standard diffusion-weighted data preprocessing, SANDI and diffusion tensor models estimated apparent soma density, soma size, neurite density, extracellular signal fraction, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity. The caudate, putamen, pallidum, and thalamus were segmented bilaterally, and microstructural and volumetric indices were extracted and compared. Correlations between SANDI in- dices, Q-Motor performance, and volumetric measures were analysed.
Results
HD was associated with reduced apparent soma density (rrb = 0.32, p ≤ 0.007) and increased apparent soma size (rrb = 0.45, p < 0.001) and extracellular signal fraction (rrb = 0.34, p ≤ 0.003) in the basal ganglia, but not the thalami, with largest effects at manifest stage. No differences were found in apparent neurite density (rrb = 0.18, p = 0.17). HD-related increases in fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity in the basal ganglia were replicated. Q-Motor component scores correlated negatively with apparent soma density and positively with soma size and extracellular signal fraction. SANDI indices and age explained up to 63% of striatal atrophy in HD.
Conclusion
SANDI measures detected HD-related neurodegeneration in the striatum, accounted significantly for striatal atrophy, and correlated with motor impairments. Decreased apparent soma density and increased soma size align with ex vivo evidence of medium spiny neuron loss and glial reactivity. SANDI shows promise as an in vivo biomarker and surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies for HD and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Introduction
Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder caused by a pathogenic CAG repeat expansion of the Huntingtin gene.1 HD is characterised by a progressive loss of cognitive and motor functions as well as psychiatric disturbances. The clinical onset of HD is commonly defined by the manifestation of motor symptoms, such as chorea, reduced voluntary motor control, bradykinesia, and difficulty maintaining rhythmic and paced movements.2–4 However, changes in the brain, notably striatal atrophy in the basal ganglia5,6 may precede the motor onset by up to 24 years7–10 and correlate with motor and cognitive decline.2,5,6,11–15 While HD is rare (∼12 in 100,000), it can be seen as a model neurodegenerative disorder, due to its clear genetic cause, well-characterized disease progression, and shared features of protein abnormalities with more common disorders like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.5
There is presently no approved disease-modifying therapy for HD, but numerous clinical trials are underway to test the safety and efficacy of novel therapeutics.16 The recent surge in potential disease-modifying targets has generated a demand for surrogate outcome measures that are sensitive to HD neuropathology and allow a mechanistic assessment of therapeutic effects on striatal neurodegeneration in a timely manner. Volumetric measurements from non-invasive MRI are known to be sensitive to disease progression17–20 and have been adopted into the recently published Huntington’s Disease Integrated Staging System (HD-ISS).21 However, volumetric measurements do not provide information about the underlying neuropathological tissue changes that lead to striatal atrophy, such as the loss of medium spiny neurons (MSN)22,23 and changes in glia cell density and morphology, including enlargement of reactive astrocytes and microglia.22,24–26
Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) is widely used to investigate brain tissue microstructure in vivo by exploiting apparent water displacement due to Brownian motion.27,28 Most DWI studies in HD have used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which models extracellular water diffusion as a Gaussian tensor and measures diffusion properties such as mean diffusivity (MD) and the degree of diffusion anisotropy (fractional anisotropy; FA).29 DTI studies in HD have consistently reported increases in MD and FA in striatal grey matter,30,31 that likely arise from the selective neurodegeneration of medium spiny neuron connections.
Advances in multi-shell and ultra-strong gradient DWI,32 have enabled increasingly sophisticated biophysical models that require data acquisition over a range of b-values to separate extra-from intracellular diffusion signals.33–35 Several approaches that model intraneurite space with cylinders or sticks have been put forward (e.g. Composite and Restricted Model of Diffusion, CHARMED33; Convex optimization modelling for microstructure informed tractography; COMMIT36; Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Index; NODDI34). NODDI studies in premanifest HD have revealed reduced apparent neurite density in white mater with localised reductions in fibre orientation dispersion in the corpus callosum and basal ganglia capsules.37 However, despite putamen volume loss, no NODDI-based differences in striatal grey matter were detected in gene-positive individuals long before motor onset.10
Soma And Neurite Density Imaging (SANDI)38 is a novel biophysical diffusion model that extends multi-compartment approaches like NODDI to account for the more complex geometrical architecture of grey matter. SANDI requires multi-shell acquisition protocols with b-values over 3,000 s/mm2 to capture restricted signal fractions from within grey matter soma, which are modelled as geometrical spheres. In this way, SANDI provides estimates of apparent soma density (fis) and soma radius (rs) in addition to apparent neurite density (fin) (modelled with sticks), extracellular signal fraction (fec) and extracellular diffusivity (De). SANDI has been shown to provide highly reproducible and repeatable parameter estimation across grey matter regions in the human brain39 that align closely with its known cyto- and myeloarchitecture. For instance, the gradients of apparent soma density maps were found to closely match those of Brodmann areas in human cortical regions with different soma density profiles,38 and correlated in the mouse brain with cell density distributions from the Allen atlas.38,40 These findings suggest the potential of the SANDI model for quantifying neurodegenerative processes in the grey matter of the living human brain.
Clinical applications of SANDI are currently limited to multiple sclerosis (MS), where reductions in apparent soma and neurite density and increases in extracellular signal fraction in grey and white matter align with MS-related demyelination, axonal loss, and neurodegeneration.41,42 These microstructural abnormalities have been found to correlate with disease severity,42 cortical or subcortical atrophy,41,43 and elevated levels of serum neurofilament light chain (NfL), a neuronal cytoplasmic protein marker of axonal damage,43 that is also sensitive to HD progression.44,45
The primary objective of this study was to assess whether SANDI indices were sensitive and specific to microstructural grey matter differences in the basal ganglia, compared with the thalami, in a group of individuals with premanifest and manifest HD relative to healthy controls. Secondary objectives were the exploration of the extent to which any HD-related SANDI differences accounted for basal ganglia atrophy, assessed with volumetric measurements, and performance differences in motor tasks, including speeded and paced finger tapping, known to be associated with striatal atrophy in HD. 46 Finally, relationships between SANDI differences and disease burden were explored by employing the Huntington’s Disease Integrated Staging System (HD-ISS) 21 and the CAG-Age Product (CAP100) score.47
Materials and methods
Participants
MRI data from 56 individuals who tested gene-positive for the mutant huntingtin allele and 57 healthy age- and sex-matched individuals (healthy controls; HC) were included in the analyses. Thirty-eight of the gene-positive individuals participated in a randomised controlled feasibility trial of HD-DRUM,48 a remote rhythmic training intervention, with ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 2 (REC Reference: 22/WA/0147).55 Here we report baseline MRI and behavioural data collected prior to randomisation into the trial arms. Additionally, we included MRI data from 18 gene-positive individuals and 18 age-matched HC from a previous study characterising white matter microstructure in premanifest HD (REC Reference: 18/WA/0172).49 Further, MRI data from 25 age- and sex-matched HC from the Wales Advanced Neuroimaging Database (WAND) Study50 (REC Reference: 18.08.14.5332RA3) and 14 from the HD-DRUM study were utilised as comparison control. All participants provided written informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki prior to taking part in the studies.
HD gene-positive individuals were identified and screened for eligibility in five HD clinics in the UK (Bristol, Birmingham, Cardiff, Exeter, and Liverpool). HC volunteers were recruited from online advertisements on the Cardiff University social network, Viva Engage, or in HD clinics as support partners or family members of individuals with HD. HC participants were also recruited through Healthwise Wales and by word of mouth. For the WAND study, data collection is reported elsewhere.50
Individuals over the age of 18 years with a good command of the English language were eligible to participate. Additional inclusion criteria for individuals with HD48 were:
Positive for the presence of the mutant huntingtin allele (CAG length ≥ 36 repeats) and/or clinical diagnosis of HD.
Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score between 9 and 13.51
Exclusion criteria were:
Contra-indication for MRI (e.g. pacemakers, stents).
An inability to provide informed consent.
For HD participants: A history of any other neurological condition.
For HC: A history of any neurological or psychiatric condition, and/or alcohol or drug abuse, that have been associated with grey matter volume loss.
To characterise general cognitive functioning HD participants were assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA).52 Verbal intellectual ability was assessed with the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF).53 Disease burden was estimated by the TFC and the CAG-Age Product (CAP100) score,47 which was calculated using the following formula:
In addition, HD participants were stratified into one of the four HD-ISS21 stages using an online calculator (https://enroll-hd.org/calc/html_basic.htm):
Stage 0: Individuals carry a mutated HD gene with CAG repeat ≥ 40.
Stage 1: Individuals meet Stage 0 criteria and exhibit striatal atrophy.
Stage 2: Individuals meet Stage 1 criteria and exhibit clinical signs or symptoms evidenced by changes in the scores on the United Huntington’s Disease Rating Scales (UHDRS)54 Total Motor Score (TMS) and cognitive changes in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).55
Stage 3: Individuals meet all previous criteria and show signs of functional change in the UHDRS Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score.
Motor outcome measures
Participants of the HD-DRUM study completed a range of motor tasks from the Quantitative-Motor (Q-Motor) test-battery,56–58 which has been shown to provide reliable assessments of speeded finger tapping performance in clinical HD trials.59,60 Tasks included left and right 1) speeded index finger tapping using force transducers,46 2) speeded foot tapping, 3) paced finger tapping46 and 4) paced foot tapping with a metronome-paced and memory-paced phase, using a fast (0.55s inter-onset interval; IOI) or slow (1.1s IOI) metronome pace as well as 5) 3D pointing to four target locations in a predefined sequence using a position-tracking stylus with the dominant hand61 and 6) 3D target pointing and speeded finger tapping dual task performed with dominant and non-dominant hand, respectively. Outcome measures for the various tasks were as follows:
Speeded tapping: mean IOI in seconds and mean area under the curve (AUC) in Newton-seconds.
Paced tapping: mean absolute deviation from the metronome rhythm, measured in seconds.
Target pointing task: target frequency in Hertz (Hz).
Target pointing-speeded tapping dual task: target frequency in Hz, mean IOI in seconds, and mean AUC in Newton-seconds.
Image acquisition
MRI data were acquired on a 3T Siemens Connectom scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with ultra-strong magnetic gradients (300mT/m) at Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC).
T1-weighted (T1w) images were acquired using a magnetisation-prepared 180-degrees radio-frequency pulses and rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE), with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) 2,300 ms, echo time (TE) 2 ms, field of view (FOV) 256 x 256 x 192 mm, matrix size 256 x 256 x 192, resolution 1 x 1 x 1 mm3, flip angle 9°, inversion time (TI) 857 ms, in-plane acceleration (GeneRalised Autocalibrating Partial Parallel Acquisition; GRAPPA) factor 2, phase-encoding direction anterior to posterior (AP), and acquisition time of 6 minutes.
Multi-shell High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI)62 data were obtained at b-values of 200 s/mm² (20 directions), 500 s/mm² (20 directions), 1,200 s/mm² (30 directions). 2,400 s/mm² (61 directions), 4,000 s/mm² (61 directions) and 6,000 s/mm² (61 directions) using a single-shot spin-echo, echo-planar imaging sequence with TR = 3,000 ms, TE = 59 ms, FOV 220 x 200 mm in-plane; matrix size 110 x 110 x 66; 2 mm3 resolution, gradient pulse duration - δ = 7 ms, gradient pulses separation - Δ = 24 ms in AP phase-encoding direction with an in-plane acceleration (GRAPPA) factor of 2. Fifteen non-diffusion-weighted (b-value = 0 s/mm²) images were acquired [two initial and 11 interspersed at the 33rd volume and every 20th volume thereafter in AP direction and 2 images in the posterior-to-anterior (PA) direction]. The HARDI acquisition time was 18 minutes.
Image processing
Diffusion-weighted image preprocessing
Multi-shell HARDI data were pre-processed and corrected for signal drift, susceptibility-induced distortions, motion and eddy current-induced distortions, gradient non-uniformity and Gibbs ringing artifacts using a custom in-house pipeline comprising tools from the FMRIB Software Library (FSL version 6.0.3),63 the MRtrix software package,64 ExploreDTI65 (version 4.8.6) and in-house MATLAB-based scripts.39
The FSL brain extraction tool63 was used to mask the first non-diffusion-weighted image from each phase-encoding direction to exclude non-brain data. The diffusion-weighted MRI volumes were fitted to temporally interspersed b0 volumes to correct for within-image intensity drift by using custom code in MATLAB R2017b (MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). Slicewise outlier detection (SOLID)66 was applied with modified Z-score thresholds of 3.5 (lower) and 10 (upper), utilising a variance-based intensity metric. FSL’s top-up tool67,68 was used to estimate susceptibility-induced off-resonance fields from b0 images that were acquired in opposing phase-encoding directions (AP and PA) and then FSL’s eddy tool69 was used to correct eddy current-induced distortions and subject movements. Gradient non-uniformity distortions were corrected using in-house code in MATLAB R2017b. Finally, Gibbs ringing correction was performed in MRtrix3 using the local subvoxel-shifts method.70
For the purpose of comparing our results with the previous literature,30 DTI was fitted with ExploreDTI using data with b-values of 500 s/mm² and 1,200 s/mm² to produce outcome maps for FA and MD, estimated with linearly weighted least squares regression.
SANDI analysis
Noise level estimation and denoising of diffusion MRI data were performed using a Marchenko-Pastur principal component analysis (MP-PCA)-based method71–73 in MRtrix3 to generate noise maps for each subject’s diffusion-weighted images. These noise maps were subsequently used to fit the SANDI model38 to the pre-processed multi-shell diffusion data with the SANDI MATLAB Toolbox (https://github.com/palombom/SANDI-Matlab-Toolbox-Latest-Release38 using all the default settings.
The model fitting produced maps of the intra-neurite, extracellular and intra-soma signal fractions (fin, fec, fis), apparent soma size (rs; measured in μm) and intra- and extra-neurite diffusivities (Din, De; measured in mm2/ms). Post-hoc sensitivity analysis of the SANDI model parameters revealed very low sensitivity to changes in Din. Consequently, it was excluded from further analysis.
T1-weighted image preprocessing
The default FreeSurfer 74 (v6) recon-all pipeline was utilised to segment subcortical basal ganglia ROIs of the caudate, putamen, and globus pallidum as well as of the thalamus as control ROIs. ROIs were segmented from T1w images and were identified and labelled in each hemisphere.
Extraction of microstructural metrics from regions-of-interest
Median values of each microstructural index from DTI (FA, MD) and SANDI (fis, fin, fec, rs, De) models were extracted for each ROI using FSL’s fslmaths. ROI masks were aligned with the diffusion space using rigid transformation with FSL’s flirt75 before eroding the boundaries of the subcortical masks to minimise partial volume effects and then aligning all microstructural maps with the masks.
Volumetric measures for each ROI and intra-cranial volume (ICV) were extracted from FreeSurfer v6. ROI volumes were normalised for ICV. The addition of brain volumes allowed exploration of the extent to which any HD-related SANDI differences accounted for basal ganglia atrophy.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed in JASP (v0.18.1.0)76, R version 4.4.1 (2024-06-14)77 in R-studio (2024.9.0.375)78 and SPSS (v27) (IBM Corp).79 Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, with p < 0.05 indicating non-normal distribution. Descriptive statistics for each group were reported as percentages (%), means and standard deviations (SD). Medians of each microstructural index in each ROI were compared between the groups with Mann-Whitney-U tests because of lack of normality and unequal variance between groups. Effect sizes for group comparisons were therefore reported with rank biserial correlation (rrb). Multiple comparisons were corrected with Benjamini-Hochberg’s method to control a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.0580 and applied to all statistical tests that related to the same theoretical inference.81
Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to test for microstructural SANDI predictors of the variance in volumetric measurements. Regression analyses were carried out for each ROI and each group separately. HD data were modelled by firstly accounting for age and TFC scores (available for all HD participants) simultaneously. This was followed by step-wise inclusion of the SANDI indices using an iterative forward selection and backward elimination method based on each variable’s F-statistic and p-value that aimed to maximise the adjusted R2-value while keeping only the most significant predictors. HC data were modelled in the same way except for the inclusion of TFC scores.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was carried out to reduce the dimensionality of HD participants’ Q-Motor data and hence the number of multiple correlations with microstructural SANDI indices. PCA followed established guidelines to limit the number of extracted components in relatively small sample sizes.82,83 First the Kaiser criterion of including all components with an eigenvalue greater than 1 was applied and the Cattell scree plot was inspected to identify the minimal number of components that accounted for most variability in the data. Each extracted component was then assessed for interpretability. PCA was conducted using orthogonal Varimax rotation of the component matrix with Kaiser normalization. Loadings that were greater than 0.5 were considered to be statistically significant.
Spearman’s rho (ρ) correlations were then calculated between HD participants’ motor component scores and the CAP100 with the SANDI indices, DTI, and volumetric measures in each ROI.
Finally, analyses to explore HD-ISS related differences in SANDI indices were conducted for SANDI indices in the basal ganglia. For these exploratory analyses a binary split combining Stage 0 and Stage 1 as "premanifest" and Stage 2 and Stage 3 as "manifest" was performed, and SANDI indices were collapsed across hemispheres by averaging. Pairwise comparisons between premanifest and HC, premanifest and manifest, and manifest and HC were conducted using Mann–Whitney U tests without additional FDR correction.
Results
Demographics
Sample characteristics, including age and sex distribution for the HD and HC groups are described in Table 1. No statistically significant differences were observed in age and sex in the HD and HC groups (p>0.05).

Demographic and clinical information of participants
Information for HD-ISS calculation was available for 27 individuals. N = 9 were stratified into Stage 1, Ν = 5 into Stage 2, and Ν = 12 into Stage 3. One individual could not be classified due to their clinical pattern not conforming with the assumption of the HD-ISS model of motor symptoms preceding functional impairments. Twenty-nine individuals could not be classified due to missing clinical data or due to their CAG repeats falling between 36-39. Details of the demographic and clinical information per HD-ISS stage and for participants who could not be classified are summarised in Supplementary Table 1.
Table 2 displays descriptive statistics for the Q-Motor measures of the HD gene-positive participants.

Descriptive statistics for motor outcome measures
Imaging analysis
HD-related differences in volumetric measures
Table 3 summarises the volumetric group differences across the eight ROIs. Figure 1 illustrates the effect size maps of volumetric differences between HD and HC, as well as raincloud plots for each ROI. Mann-Whitney tests identified significantly reduced volumes in all basal ganglia ROIs in HD gene-positive compared to healthy individuals. In contrast, only a marginally significant reduction was present in the right thalamus (FDR-p = .048) and a non-significant reduction in the left thalamus (FDR-p = .063).

Volumetric differences in the basal ganglia and thalamus between HD-gene positive (HD) individuals and healthy controls (HC).
Regions-of-interest (ROIs) were segmented using FreeSurfer v6. All ROIs, except the left thalamus, showed significantly smaller volumes in the HD cohort after FDR correction for multiple comparisons. Colours indicate the strength of rank-biserial correlations (rrb) from Mann-Whitney U tests: Red = strong effect (rrb ≥ 0.5), Yellow = medium effect (0.3 ≤ rrb < 0.5), White = small effect (rrb < 0.3). Raincloud plots show the distribution of the volumetric measures in each ROI per group with orange (HD gene=1) for HD-gene positive and green (HD gene=0) for HD-gene negative participants. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001

Descriptive and Mann-Whitney Statistics for Intracranial Volume-Normalised Regions of Interest
HD-related differences in microstructural measures
Descriptive and statistical microstructural results are shown in detail in Table 4. Figure 2 provides effect size mappings and raincloud plots of the different microstructural measures for each ROI comparing the two groups.

Microstructural differences in ROIs between HD-gene positive (HD) and healthy control (HC) groups.
Median values of each microstructural measure were extracted per ROI. A) HD individuals show reduced soma density (fis) in the basal ganglia (BG). B) Soma radius (rs) is elevated in the caudate and putamen but reduced in the pallidum. C) Extracellular water fraction (fec) is increased in BG regions in the HD group. D) Extracellular diffusivity (De) is higher in the putamen and pallidum. E) Fractional anisotropy (FA) is elevated in the BG, and F) mean diffusivity (MD) is increased in the striatum. Colours indicate the strength of rank-biserial correlations (rrb) from Mann-Whitney U tests: Red = strong effect (rrb ≥ 0.5), Yellow = medium effect (0.3 ≤ rrb < 0.5), White = small effect (rrb < 0.3). Raincloud plots show the distribution of the microstructural measures in each ROI per group with orange (HD gene=1) for HD-gene positive and green (HD gene=0) for HD-gene negative participants. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001


Descriptive and Mann-Whitney Statistics for Microstructural Measures in Regions of Interest
The SANDI measures revealed between-group differences in the basal ganglia but not thalami for apparent soma density and size, and extracellular signal fraction (Fig. 2). HD gene-positive individuals exhibited reduced apparent soma density (Fig. 2A) across all basal ganglia ROIs, while apparent soma size was elevated bilaterally in the caudate and putamen but decreased in the pallidum (Fig. 2B). Elevated extracellular signal fraction was observed in the basal ganglia (Fig. 2C), while extracellular diffusivity was higher in the putamen and pallidum but showed no significant differences in the caudate (Fig. 2D). No differences were observed for apparent neurite density fin in any of the ROIs (FDR-p ≥ 0.167, absolute r < 0.2).
Regarding the DTI measures, increased FA and MD (FDR-p < 0.01) were observed in the basal ganglia (Fig. 2E-F) with the exception of MD in the left pallidum (FDR-p = 0.854).
No differences were found in the thalami for any of the microstructural metrics.
Correlations between BG microstructure and motor performance in HD
Motor measures
PCA extracted one principal component that explained 64% of the Q-Motor data with high loadings (> 0.5 or <-0.5) from all variables (Table 5). Spearman’s rho correlation between Q-motor component scores and the disease burden CAP100 score revealed a positive correlation (ρ = 0.61, p = 0.002, N = 24), i.e., higher disease burden was associated with higher scores in the Q-Motor component reflecting slower and less accurate motor performance (Figure 3).

Scatterplot showing positive relationship between the Q-Motor principal component and the disease burden measure (CAP100) with the Spearman’s rho (ρ) test.


Rotated Component Loadings on the Q-motor Outcome Measures
Spearman’s rho correlations between Q-motor component scores and SANDI microstructural measures from all ROIs and scatter plots are displayed in Figure 4. Figure 5 displays correlations and scatter plots of the Q-Motor component with DTI and volumetric indices. Overall, negative correlations were observed between principal Q-Motor component scores and apparent soma density in the basal ganglia, apparent soma size in the pallidum, and volumetric measurements in all ROIs, reflecting that lower apparent soma density and volumes were associated with impaired motor performance, reflected as higher scores in the Q-Motor component. Conversely, positive correlations were present between Q-Motor component scores and apparent soma size, extracellular signal fraction, and extracellular diffusivity in the basal ganglia, i.e. larger apparent soma size and extracellular signal were associated with impaired motor performance (Figure 4 and 5).

A) Correlation matrix and B-G) selected scatter plots illustrating Spearman’s rho correlations between SANDI measures and the Q-Motor principal component.
A) Each cell represents the Spearman’s rho correlation strength, with pink indicating negative and green positive correlations. B-G) Each plot includes a best-fit least squares linear regression line with standard error indicated by the grey shaded area, along with the Spearman’s rho (ρ) and the corresponding FDR-p value. Scatter dot colours represent participants’ HD-ISS stage and those who were not classified due to having CAG<40 or incomplete clinical data. Abbreviations: De: Extracellular diffusivity; fec: Extracellular signal fraction; fin: Neurite density signal fraction; fis: Soma density signal fraction; PC: Principal component; rs: Soma radius; TFC: Total functional capacity.

A) Correlation matrix and B-D) selected scatter plots illustrating Spearman’s rho correlations between DTI, volumetric measures and the Q-Motor principal component.
A) Each cell represents the Spearman’s rho correlation strength, with pink indicating negative and green positive correlations. B-D) Each plot includes a best-fit least squares linear regression line with standard error indicated by the grey shaded area, along with the Spearman’s rho (ρ) and the corresponding FDR-p value. Scatter dot colours represent participants’ HD-ISS stage and those who were not classified due to having CAG<40 or incomplete clinical data. Abbreviations: FA: Fractional anisotropy; MD: Mean diffusivity.
Microstructural predictors of BG volumes
Hierarchical linear regression analyses of the healthy control data (Table 6, Figure 6) revealed that 17% of volumetric variation in the left caudate was accounted for by age and apparent soma density while 11% of variation in the right caudate was explained by age and extracellular diffusivity (De). Age accounted for 25% of volumetric differences in the left putamen, and together with De for 29% of differences in right putamen. Age alone explained 17% of left and 11% of right thalamic volume variation. No significant regression models were present for bilateral globus pallidus.

Standardised beta coefficients of SANDI microstructural metrics predicting volume (normalised for intracranial volume) in regions of interest in the healthy control group.
Abbreviations: De: Extracellular diffusivity; fis: Soma density signal fraction; rs: Soma radius; TFC: Total functional capacity. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

Hierarchical Linear Regression Predicting Normalised Volumes from SANDI Microstructural Metrics, Controlling for Age in the Healthy Control Participants
In contrast, regression analyses for the HD data (Table 7, Figures 7 & 8) showed that 60% of volume variation in the left caudate and 51% of variation in the right caudate were accounted for by age and apparent soma density and size. Similarly, 57% of variation in the right putamen volume were explained by age and apparent soma size, while 63% of volume differences in the left putamen were explained by age, apparent soma size as well as extracellular signal and diffusivity. Comparable to the healthy control results, age alone accounted for 30% of volume variation in the left and for 35% in the right thalamus while no age effects were present for bilateral globus pallidus. However, in HD patients 42% of volume variation in the left pallidum was explained by apparent soma size and extracellular signal and 27% of volume variation in the right pallidum by extracellular signal fraction only. No significant contributions of TFC were present.


Hierarchical Linear Regression Models Predicting Normalised Volumes in each Region of Interest from SANDI Microstructural Metrics, Controlling for Age and TFC in HD Gene-Positive Participants

Standardised beta coefficients of SANDI microstructural metrics predicting volume (normalised for intracranial volume) in left hemisphere regions of interest in Huntington’s disease patients.
Abbreviations: De: Extracellular diffusivity; fec: Extracellular signal fraction; fis: Soma density signal fraction; rs: Soma radius. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

Standardised beta coefficients of SANDI microstructural metrics predicting volume (normalised for intracranial volume) in right hemisphere regions of interest in Huntington’s disease patients.
Abbreviations: fec: Extracellular signal fraction; fis: Soma density signal fraction; rs: Soma radius; TFC: Total functional capacity. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Correlation of disease burden with microstructural and volumetric measures
The CAP100 score as an index of disease progression was correlated with brain measurements to explore the relationship between disease burden and microstructural and volumetric differences (Figure 9). Figure 9A summarises correlation coefficient strengths and levels of significance. Figures 9B-J display scatter plots of significant correlations between the CAP100 and microstructural and volumetric measures. Increased CAP100 was negatively correlated with apparent soma density, and volume size in bilateral caudate and putamen, as well as with pallidal apparent soma size. Positive correlations were observed between CAP100 and extracellular diffusivity and signal fraction, apparent soma size in caudate, putamen, and thalamus, apparent neurite density in putamen, FA in the basal ganglia, and MD in caudate and putamen.

A) Correlation matrix and B-J) selected scatter plots illustrating Spearman’s rho correlations between SANDI, DTI, and volumetric measures with CAP100. Each scatter plot includes a best-fit least squares linear regression line with standard error indicated by the grey shaded area, along with the Spearman’s rho (ρ) and the corresponding FDR-p value. Scatter dot colours represent participants’ HD-ISS stage and those who were not classified due to having CAG < 40 or incomplete clinical data. Abbreviations: De: Extracellular diffusivity; FA: Fractional anisotropy; fec: Extracellular signal fraction; fin: Neurite density signal fraction; fis: Soma density signal fraction; MD: Mean diffusivity; rs: Soma radius; vol: Normalised volume.
Exploratory pairwise comparisons between HD-ISS premanifest and manifest HD individuals
Exploratory comparisons of apparent soma density, apparent soma size, extracellular signal fraction and diffusivity averaged across left and right basal ganglia ROIs (Table 4), were carried out between individuals at premanifest HD-ISS Stage 1 (n = 9), individuals at manifest Stages 2 and 3 (n = 17), and healthy controls (Supplementary Table 1).
Compared to the premanifest group, manifest HD individuals exhibited reduced apparent soma density in the striatum, smaller apparent soma size in the pallidum, and increased extracellular diffusivity in the putamen (rrb = 0.428–0.513, p = 0.01–0.031). Compared to controls, individuals with premanifest HD showed increased extracellular signal fraction in the basal ganglia, larger apparent soma size in the caudate and putamen, and reduced apparent soma density and extracellular diffusivity in the pallidum (rrb = 0.243–0.459, p < 0.001–0.02). The manifest group differed from controls in all measures. Descriptive statistics and statistical analysis results are in Supplementary Table 2. Bar plots displaying effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals for all pairwise comparisons are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.
Discussion
This is the first study to investigate HD-related microstructural differences in the basal ganglia with SANDI, a novel diffusion MRI technique, that was devised to probe grey matter microstructure. The objective of the study was to explore SANDI indices as potential non-invasive in vivo MRI markers of HD neuropathology that may provide more specific information about disease-related tissue abnormalities than volumetric measurements. SANDI indices of apparent soma density and size were found to be sensitive to HD pathology in the basal ganglia and explained, together with age, up to 63% of striatal atrophy in HD. Furthermore, SANDI indices correlated with motor impairments and CAP100 disease burden in HD. This pattern of results suggests the potential of SANDI indices for future imaging biomarkers of disease progression and of the neural effects of novel disease-modifying therapeutics in HD and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Microstructural and Volumetric Alterations in HD
Well-established patterns of significant volume loss accompanied by increases in FA and MD in the basal ganglia were replicated in HD compared with healthy controls. FA increases in the caudate and putamen are thought to occur due to the selective degeneration of medium spiny neuron connections.20,84 No microstructural differences and only trends for volumetric reduction were present in the thalami. This pattern of macro- and microstructural differences in the basal ganglia is in accordance with previously reported changes in the basal ganglia associated with premanifest and early manifest HD stages.31,85
Importantly, the application of SANDI revealed novel information about HD-related microstructural differences in the basal ganglia. In gene-positive compared with healthy individuals, apparent soma density was reduced and accompanied by increases in extracellular signal fraction and diffusivity across the caudate, putamen, and pallidum but not the thalami. In addition, apparent soma size was increased in the caudate and putamen and reduced in the globus pallidus in individuals with HD.
HD-related reductions of apparent soma density in the basal ganglia are consistent with the loss of striatal medium spiny neurons, the histopathological hallmark of HD,22,23 and downstream degeneration of pallidal neurons likely due to the loss of striatal projections. Furthermore, changes in apparent soma size may reflect shifts in the proportion of neural and glial cell density and/or changes in cell morphology, including astrocyte and microglia swelling in response to neurodegeneration22,24–26 and soma shrinkage prior to neuronal cell death.86,87
Exploratory analyses using stratification into premanifest HD-ISS Stage 1 and manifest Stages 2 and 3 revealed that apparent soma density reductions in the striatum became more pronounced with disease progression. Regional variability of differences in apparent soma size were observed with early increases in the striatum and later reductions in the globus pallidus. Increases in extracellular signal fraction with disease progression were apparent across all basal ganglia ROIs while increases in diffusivity were particularly pronounced in the putamen and pallidum at manifest stages. These preliminary findings suggest that SANDI indices may be sensitive to neuropathological processes associated with different stages of HD.
Microstructural predictors of basal ganglia atrophy in HD
Regression analyses testing for microstructural predictors of HD-related atrophy in each ROI demonstrated that SANDI indices accounted for a significant proportion of atrophy in the basal ganglia but not the thalami.
Up to 63% of HD-related striatal atrophy was predicted by apparent soma density and size and age. This dropped to 27% and 42% of atrophy in right and left pallidum explained by apparent soma size and extracellular signal fraction, while age alone accounted for volume differences in the thalami. The latter finding in the thalami mirrored the pattern of results in the healthy control data where age was the most significant predictor across all ROIs (except bilateral pallidum) and the only predictor in the thalami, while diffusivity contributed to right-lateralised basal ganglia regions and apparent soma density to left caudate only.
Together these results demonstrate that SANDI indices of apparent soma density and size may capture HD-related differences in striatal grey matter microstructure in vivo. As outlined above, striatal reductions in apparent soma density and increases in apparent soma size are in accordance with the HD characteristic loss of medium spiny neurons and reactive gliosis and explained a significant proportion of HD-related atrophy in the caudate and the putamen.
Associations Between SANDI microstructural indices and Motor Function
The observed correlations between SANDI metrics and motor measures provide novel insights into the functional implications of microstructural alterations in HD. Consistent with the role of the basal ganglia in motor initiation and coordination,88 the present study demonstrated that microstructural differences in HD, notably reduced apparent soma density in the striatum and reduced apparent soma size in the pallidum were associated with poorer Q-Motor performance, which in turn was associated with larger disease burden. This is evidenced by increased IOI and ACU in speeded tapping tasks, as well as difficulties in the paced metronome tapping task. Similarly, increased apparent soma size in the striatum, as well as elevated extracellular signal and diffusivity across all three basal ganglia regions, and striatal FA and MD, were linked to motor impairments. These findings suggest that microstructural differences due to basal ganglia neurodegeneration and associated glial reactivity are directly linked to subtle motor impairments.
Clinical Implications and Future Directions
The present study acquired multi-shell (max b-value = 6,000 s/mm2) DWI data on a non-clinical ultra-strong gradient (300mT/m) 3T MRI system. Ultra-strong gradient imaging has the advantage of improving the signal-to-noise-ratio at high b-values due to shorter echo times (TE), which in turn provides enhanced sensitivity to small water displacement,39 and minimises bias due to inter-compartmental exchange.89,90 However, it is important to note that it has been demonstrated feasible to acquire multi-shell DWI data for SANDI modelling on standard clinical 3T MRI systems,91 and that such acquisitions have been shown to be sensitive to neuropathology in MS.43 Thus, it is possible apply SANDI indices clinically.
Our findings highlight the potential of SANDI-derived metrics as future markers for tracking disease progression and assessing therapeutic efficacy in HD and more common neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. The sensitivity of apparent soma density and size, and extracellular water signal to microstructural changes in HD offers a complementary perspective to volumetric measures, which are currently the most widely employed imaging modality in clinical trials. Furthermore, the associations between SANDI metrics and motor measures that were correlated with disease burden scores underscore their relevance in evaluating the efficacy of emerging disease-modifying treatments.
Conclusion
In our study, we demonstrate the utility of SANDI for characterising microstructural abnormalities in HD, providing a detailed view of basal ganglia pathology and its implications for motor functions. By bridging the gap between histopathological findings and in vivo imaging, SANDI offers a promising avenue for advancing HD research and clinical care.
Data availability
This research utilised baseline data from the HD-DRUM project that has been endorsed by the Enroll-HD Scientific Oversight Committee (SOC) (14/11/2022). At the end of the HD-DRUM project, the coded study data will be shared and made accessible to the research community via the Enroll-HD specific data request process.
Supplementary figures

Bar plot showing the effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals for all the exploratory pairwise comparisons between premanifest, manifest and control groups.
Significant comparisons are marked with * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), and *** (p < 0.001).

Demographic and clinical information per HD-ISS stage.

Descriptive statistics and non-parametric pairwise comparisons for SANDI indices (significant for HD vs HC) between premanifest, manifest, and control participants.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Amy Dangerfield, Allison Cooper and Sonya Foley-Bozorgzad for their help with data collection as well as Derek Jones and John Evans for their advice and support with regards to the implementation of MRI data acquisition protocols. We would like to thank the following clinical and administrative staff at the participating patient identification centres for their help with identifying suitable patients for the study: Eileen Donovan, Kim Munnery, and Jane Davies from the Cardiff HD clinic; Jessica Prado Mota from the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust in Exeter; Jenni Burns from the Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust in Liverpool; Natalie Rosewell, Anya Soonderpershad, and Dr Liz Coulthard from the Bristol Brain Centre; Claire Tilley and Dr Hugh Rickards from the Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust. In addition, we would like to thank all Public Involvement contributors and the members of the Enroll-HD Scientific Oversight Committee for their input into the study as well as all participants for their generous time commitment to help us conducting this research.
Additional information
Funding
This work was supported by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) Advanced Fellowship to CM-B (grant number: NIHR-FS(A)-2022). The Centre for Trials Research at Cardiff University receives infrastructure funding from HCRW. MP is supported by the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship MR/T020296/2. CC was funded by a Wellcome Trust PhD studentship (204005/Z/16/Z) and LL by a PhD studentship of the School of Psychology at Cardiff University. The WANDI project was funded by a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award (096646/Z/11/Z), a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (104943/Z/14/Z), and a Wellcome Discovery Awards (227882/Z/23/Z and 317797/Z/24/Z).
Funding
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR-FS(A)-2022)
Claudia Metzler-Baddeley
Health and Care Research Wales (NIHR-FS(A)-2022)
Claudia Metzler-Baddeley
UKRI (MR/T020296/2)
Marco Palombo
Wellcome Trust
https://doi.org/10.35802/204005
Chiara Casella
Cardiff University
Lucy Layland
Wellcome Trust
https://doi.org/10.35802/096646
Wellcome Trust
https://doi.org/10.35802/227882
Wellcome Trust (317797/Z/24/Z)
Wellcome Trust
References
- 1.Huntington’s disease (HD): the neuropathology of a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder of the human brainBrain Pathology 26:726–740https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12426Google Scholar
- 2.Biological and clinical changes in premanifest and early stage Huntington’s disease in the TRACK-HD study: the 12-month longitudinal analysisLancet Neurol 10:31–42https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70276-3Google Scholar
- 3.Huntington’s disease: A clinical reviewOrphanet J Rare Dis 5https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-5-40Google Scholar
- 4.Huntington’s diseaseThe Lancet 369:218–228https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60111-1Google Scholar
- 5.Huntington disease: Natural history, biomarkers and prospects for therapeuticsNat Rev Neurol 10:204–216https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.24Google Scholar
- 6.Striatal volume contributes to the prediction of onset of Huntington disease in incident casesBiol Psychiatry 71:822–828https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.030Google Scholar
- 7.Cortical morphometry and neural dysfunction in Huntington’s disease: a reviewEur J Neurol 28:1406–1419https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14648Google Scholar
- 8.Volumetric MRI-Based Biomarkers in Huntington’s Disease: An Evidentiary ReviewFront Neurol 12https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.712555Google Scholar
- 9.Striatal morphology and neurocognitive dysfunction in Huntington disease: The IMAGE-HD studyPsychiatry Res Neuroimaging 291:1–8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.07.003Google Scholar
- 10.Biological and Clinical Characteristics of Gene Carriers Far from Predicted Onset in the Huntington’s Disease Young Adult Study (HD-YAS): A Cross-Sectional AnalysisLancet Neurol 19:502–512Google Scholar
- 11.Detection of Huntington’s disease decades before diagnosis: The Predict-HD studyJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:874–880https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.128728Google Scholar
- 12.Refining the diagnosis of huntington disease: The PREDICT-HD studyFront Aging Neurosci 5:1–8https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00012Google Scholar
- 13.Biological and clinical manifestations of Huntington’s disease in the longitudinal TRACK-HD study: cross-sectional analysis of baseline dataLancet Neurol 8:791–801https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70170-XGoogle Scholar
- 14.Potential endpoints for clinical trials in premanifest and early Huntington’s disease in the TRACK-HD study: analysis of 24 month observational dataLancet Neurol 11:42–53https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70263-0Google Scholar
- 15.Predictors of phenotypic progression and disease onset in premanifest and early-stage Huntington’s disease in the TRACK-HD study: Analysis of 36-month observational dataLancet Neurol 12:637–649https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70088-7Google Scholar
- 16.Potential disease-modifying therapies for Huntington’s disease: lessons learned and future opportunitiesLancet Neurol 21:645–658https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00121-1Google Scholar
- 17.Huntington’s disease-neuropathologyHandbook of Clinical Neurology 100:83–100Google Scholar
- 18.Longitudinal imaging highlights preferential basal ganglia circuit atrophy in Huntington’s diseaseBrain Commun 5https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad214Google Scholar
- 19.Dynamics of Cortical Degeneration Over a Decade in Huntington’s DiseaseBiol Psychiatry 89:807–816https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.11.009Google Scholar
- 20.Diffusion imaging in Huntington’s disease: Comprehensive reviewJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 92:62–69https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324377Google Scholar
- 21.A biological classification of Huntington’s disease: the Integrated Staging SystemLancet Neurol 21:632–644https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00120-XGoogle Scholar
- 22.Decreased Neuronal and Increased Oligodendroglial Densities in Huntington’s Disease Caudate NucleusJ Neuropathol Exp Neurol 50:729–742https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199111000-00005Google Scholar
- 23.Expression pattern of apoptosis-related markers in Huntington’s diseaseActa Neuropathol 109:321–328https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-004-0957-5Google Scholar
- 24.Connexin expression in Huntington’s diseased human brainCell Biol Int 22:837–847https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.1998.0388Google Scholar
- 25.Ferritin accumulation in dystrophic microglia is an early event in the development of Huntington’s DiseaseGlia 55:1074–1084https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20526Google Scholar
- 26.Early and Progressive Accumulation of Reactive Microglia in the Huntington Disease BrainJ Neuropathol Exp Neurol 60:161–172https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/60.2.161Google Scholar
- 27.Imaging of diffusion and microcirculation with gradient sensitization: Design, strategy, and significanceJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1:7–28https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880010103Google Scholar
- 28.MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imagingBiophys J 66:259–267https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1Google Scholar
- 29.Microstructural and Physiological Features of Tissues Elucidated by Quantitative-Diffusion-Tensor MRIJ Magn Reson B 111:209–219https://doi.org/10.1006/jmrb.1996.0086Google Scholar
- 30.Automated differentiation of pre-diagnosis Huntington’s disease from healthy control individuals based on quadratic discriminant analysis of the basal ganglia: The IMAGE-HD studyNeurobiol Dis 51:82–92https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2012.10.001Google Scholar
- 31.Evaluation of multi-modal, multi-site neuroimaging measures in Huntington’s disease: Baseline results from the PADDINGTON studyNeuroimage Clin 2:204–211https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2012.12.001Google Scholar
- 32.Microstructural imaging of the human brain with a ‘super-scanner’: 10 key advantages of ultra-strong gradients for diffusion MRINeuroimage 182:8–38https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.047Google Scholar
- 33.Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brainNeuroimage 27:48–58https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.042Google Scholar
- 34.NODDI: Practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brainNeuroimage 61:1000–1016https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072Google Scholar
- 35.Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Recent Advances and Applications. Seminars in UltrasoundCT and MRI 42:490–506https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2021.07.006Google Scholar
- 36.COMMIT: Convex Optimization Modeling for Microstructure Informed TractographyIEEE Trans Med Imaging 34:246–257https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2352414Google Scholar
- 37.In vivo characterization of white matter pathology in premanifest huntington’s diseaseAnn Neurol 84:497–504https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25309Google Scholar
- 38.SANDI: A compartment-based model for non-invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion MRINeuroimage 215:116835https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116835Google Scholar
- 39.MICRA: Microstructural image compilation with repeated acquisitionsNeuroimage 225:117406https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117406Google Scholar
- 40.Soma and Neurite Density MRI (SANDI) of the in-vivo mouse brain and comparison with the Allen Brain AtlasNeuroimage 254https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119135Google Scholar
- 41.Detection of grey matter microstructural substrates of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosisBrain Commun 5https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad153Google Scholar
- 42.In vivo quantification of brain soma and neurite density abnormalities in multiple sclerosisJ Neurol 270:433–445https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11386-3Google Scholar
- 43.A novel imaging marker of cortical “cellularity” in multiple sclerosis patientsSci Rep 14:9848https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60497-6Google Scholar
- 44.Evaluation of Mutant Huntingtin and Neurofilament Proteins as Potential Markers in Huntington’s Disease10https://www.science.org
- 45.Cortical microstructural correlates of plasma neurofilament light chain in Huntington’s diseaseParkinsonism Relat Disord 85:91–94https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.03.008Google Scholar
- 46.Tapping linked to function and structure in premanifest and symptomatic Huntington diseaseNeurology 75:2150–2160https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182020123Google Scholar
- 47.Standardizing the CAP Score in Huntington’s Disease by Predicting Age-at-OnsetJ Huntingtons Dis 11:153–171https://doi.org/10.3233/JHD-210475Google Scholar
- 48.Protocol for a randomised controlled unblinded feasibility trial of HD-DRUM: a rhythmic movement training application for cognitive and motor symptoms in people with Huntington’s diseaseBMJ Open 14:e082161https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082161Google Scholar
- 49.Mutation-related magnetization-transfer, not axon density, drives white matter differences in premanifest Huntington disease: Evidence from in vivo ultra-strong gradient MRIHum Brain Mapp :3439–3460https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25859Google Scholar
- 50.WAND: A multi-modal dataset integrating advanced MRI, MEG, and TMS for multi-scale brain analysisSci Data 12:220https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04154-7Google Scholar
- 51.Unified Huntington’s disease rating scale: A follow upMovement Disorders 13:915–919https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.870130609Google Scholar
- 52.The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive ImpairmentJ Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.xGoogle Scholar
- 53.Test of Premorbid FunctioningGoogle Scholar
- 54.Unified Huntington’s disease rating scale: Reliability and consistencyMovement Disorders. 11:136–142https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.870110204Google Scholar
- 55.Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)WPS Google Scholar
- 56.F55 Q-motor speeded tapping and pointing assessments: feasibility of a dual task design. In: F: Clinical Studies: Case ReportsObservational Studies and Trials :A56.1–A56https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-ehdn.146Google Scholar
- 57.F63 Preliminary results from Q-MOTOR/Q-COG analyses in the repair-hd studyClinical Studies :A62.1–A62https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.164Google Scholar
- 58.Motor Outcome Measures in Huntington Disease Clinical TrialsElsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801893-4.00018-3Google Scholar
- 59.F41 The proof-hd phase 3 study: pridopidine’s outcome on function in huntington disease (PROOF)F: Clinical Studies: Case Reports, Observational Studies and Trials BMJ Publishing Group Ltd :A36.1–A36https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-EHDN.84Google Scholar
- 60.Safety and efficacy of laquinimod for Huntington’s disease (LEGATO-HD): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 studyLancet Neurol 23:243–255https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00454-4Google Scholar
- 61.Multifeature quantitative motor assessment of upper limb ataxia including drawing and reachingAnn Clin Transl Neurol 11:1097–1109https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52024Google Scholar
- 62.High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneityMagn Reson Med 48:577–582https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10268Google Scholar
- 63.Fast robust automated brain extractionHum Brain Mapp 17:143–155https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10062Google Scholar
- 64.MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisationNeuroimage 202https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137Google Scholar
- 65.ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR dataIn: ISMRM Google Scholar
- 66.Fast and accurate Slicewise OutLIer Detection (SOLID) with informed model estimation for diffusion MRI dataNeuroimage 181:331–346https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.003Google Scholar
- 67.How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imagingNeuroimage 20:870–888https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7Google Scholar
- 68.Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSLNeuroimage 23:S208–S219https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051Google Scholar
- 69.An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imagingNeuroimage 125:1063–1078https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019Google Scholar
- 70.Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shiftsMagn Reson Med 76:1574–1581https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26054Google Scholar
- 71.Complex diffusion-weighted image estimation via matrix recovery under general noise modelsNeuroimage 200:391–404https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.039Google Scholar
- 72.Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theoryMagn Reson Med 76:1582–1593https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26059Google Scholar
- 73.Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theoryNeuroimage 142:394–406https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016Google Scholar
- 74.FreeSurferNeuroimage 62:774–781https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021Google Scholar
- 75.Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain ImagesNeuroimage 17:825–841https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(02)91132-8Google Scholar
- 76.JASP
- 77.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
- 78.RStudio: Integrated Development for R
- 79.IBM SPSS Statistics for WindowsGoogle Scholar
- 80.Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple TestingJ R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57:289–300https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.xGoogle Scholar
- 81.Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analysesEur J Soc Psychol 44:701–710https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023Google Scholar
- 82.Exploratory Factor Analysis in Behavior Genetics Research: Factor Recovery with Small Sample SizesBehav Genet 32:153–161https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015210025234Google Scholar
- 83.Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample SizesMultivariate Behav Res 44:147–181https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794206Google Scholar
- 84.The Effect of Huntington’s Disease on the Basal Nuclei: A ReviewCureus https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24473Google Scholar
- 85.Seeking huntington disease biomarkers by multimodal, cross-sectional basal ganglia imagingHum Brain Mapp 34:1625–1635https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22019Google Scholar
- 86.Neuronal Cell DeathPhysiol Rev. 98:813–880https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00011.2017Google Scholar
- 87.Apoptosis: A Basic Biological Phenomenon with Wideranging Implications in Tissue KineticsBr J Cancer 26:239–257https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1972.33Google Scholar
- 88.What, If, and When to Move: Basal Ganglia Circuits and Self-Paced Action InitiationAnnu Rev Neurosci 42:459–483https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031033Google Scholar
- 89.Diffusion time dependence, power-law scaling, and exchange in gray matterNeuroimage 251:118976https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118976Google Scholar
- 90.Neurite Exchange Imaging ((NEXI): A minimal model of diffusion in gray matter with inter-compartment water exchangeNeuroimage 256https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119277Google Scholar
- 91.Mapping tissue microstructure across the human brain on a clinical scanner with soma and neurite density image metricsHum Brain Mapp 44:4792–4811https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26416Google Scholar
Article and author information
Author information
Version history
- Preprint posted:
- Sent for peer review:
- Reviewed Preprint version 1:
Cite all versions
You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.107661. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.
Copyright
© 2025, Ioakeimidis et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
- views
- 810
- downloads
- 2
- citations
- 0
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.