Figures and data
MAGIC regulators revealed by a genome-wide screen in yeast and validations in human RPE-1 cells.
(A) Workflow of the spGFP-based genetic screen in yeast. (B) KEGG pathway analysis of validated mutants that affect MAGIC. The size of the node indicates the number of genes identified. Pathways with at least two associated genes are shown. (C, D) Representative images (C) and quantification (D) of Lsg1 spGFP signal in WT and Δsnf1 cells at 30 °C. Shown in (C): Top, Lsg1 spGFP; Bottom, merged images of spGFP and mitochondria labeled with MTS-mCherry. Shown in (D): means ± SEM of spGFP/mCherry ratio . Unpaired two-tailed t-test. (E) Schematic diagram of Snf1 activation in yeast. (F, G) Representative images (F) and quantification (G) of Lsg1 spGFP signal in Δltv1 and wild-type LTV1 cells at 30°C and after HS. Shown in (G): means ± SEM of spGFP/mCherry ratio . Paired two-tailed t-test. HS: heat shock. (H, I) Representative images (H) and quantification (I) of FlucSM spGFP in Snf1-inactive (REG1 in HG) and Snf1-active cells (Δreg1 in HG; REG1 in LG). Shown in (H): Top, FlucSM spGFP; Bottom, merged images of spGFP and mitochondria labeled with Tom70- mCherry. Shown in (I): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity . Paired (REG1 in HG vs. LG) or unpaired (REG1 vs. Δreg1 in HG) two-tailed t-test. (J) Representative images of FlucDM spGFP in RPE-1 cells treated with DMSO, dorsomorphin, or AICAR. Top, FlucDM spGFP; Middle, mitochondria-targeted mCherry; Bottom, merged images. (K-M) Flow cytometry-based quantifications of FlucDM spGFP in RPE-1 cells treated with DMSO, dorsomorphin, or AICAR (K, M), and GST spGFP in cells treated with DMSO or dorsomorphin (L). Means ± SEM are shown. Paired two-tailed t-test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant, P > 0.05. HG: 2% glucose; LG: 0.1% glucose plus 3% glycerol. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Snf1 negatively regulates mitochondrial import of cytosolic misfolded proteins.
(A) Schematic diagram showing three possible explanations for reduced spGFP in mitochondria of Snf1-active cells: reduced MPs, blocked import, or enhanced degradation. (B, C) Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of FlucSM spGFP in Snf1-inactive and Snf1- active cells overexpressing copper-inducible PIM1 or pim1S974D. Shown in (C): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. (D) Relative luciferase activity in Snf1-inactive and Snf1-active cells after 90 min of estradiol treatment. Means ± SEM of normalized FlucSM activity are shown. Paired (WT in different media) or unpaired (WT vs. Δreg1 in HG) two-tailed t-test. LG-Gly: 0.1% glucose only. (E) Hypothetical regulations of import of MPs through transcriptional repressors and activators downstream of Snf1 activation. (F, G) Representative images (F) and quantification (G) of FlucSM spGFP in Δreg1 and Δreg1Δhap4 cells in HG medium. Shown in (G): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. (H, I) Representative images (H) and quantification (I) of FlucSM spGFP in wild-type cells (control) or with constitutive overexpression of HAP4 in HG medium. Shown in (I): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant, P > 0.05. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Mechanisms underlying Snf1-regulated MP import into mitochondria.
(A) Fold changes in protein abundance of TOM complex components in Snf1-active condition (glycerol or galactose) compared to Snf1-inactive condition (glucose). Raw data are retrieved from a published quantitative mass spectrometry dataset (24). (B, C) Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of FlucSM spGFP in wild-type control cells and cells overexpressing Tom20cd, Tom22cd, and Tom70cd (C), or truncated Tom70cd variants (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D) in LG medium. Shown in (C) are means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test between control and overexpression strains. (D, E) Representative images (D) and quantification (E) of FlucSM spGFP in wild-type control, Δtom70, Δtom71, and Δtom70 Δtom71 (ΔΔ) cells in HG medium. Shown in (D): Top, FlucSM spGFP; Bottom, merged images of spGFP and mitochondria labeled with mCherry-Fis1TM. Shown in (E): means ± SEM of normalized spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. (F, G) Representative images (F) and quantification (G) of FlucSM spGFP in control and Δtom6 cells overexpressing Tom70cd in LG medium. Shown in (G): means ± SEM of normalized spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant, P > 0.05. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Snf1 activation protests cellular fitness under proteotoxic stress.
(A) Growth rates of wild-type cells and cells overexpressing Tom70cd with (Estradiol) or without (EtOH) FlucSM expression in HG and LG medium. Means ± SEM of OD 600 or growth rates are shown. Paired two-tailed t-test. (B) Fraction of FlucSM spGFP-positive cells measured by flow cytometry. Means ± SEM are shown. Unpaired two-tailed t-test for cells growing in the same medium. Paired two-tailed t-test for control cells growing in different medium. (C) Comparisons of mitochondrial membrane potential between FlucSM spGFP-negative and spGFP-positive cells measured by TMRM. Means ± SEM are shown. Paired two-tailed t-test. (D-I) Representative images and quantifications of α-synuclein (αSyn) spGFP and FUSP525L spGFP signal. Shown in (F, H): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity measured by confocal imaging. Shown in (G, I): means ± SEM of fraction of spGFP-positive cells measured by flow cytometry. Unpaired two-tailed t- test for cells growing in the same medium. Paired two-tailed t-test for control cells between HG and LG medium. (J, K) Comparisons of membrane potential between αSyn or FUSP525L spGFP- negative and spGFP-positive cells measured by TMRM. Means ± SEM are shown. Paired two- tailed t-test. n.d.: not determined due to limited positive cell counts in control cells growing in LG medium. (L) Fraction of respiratory-deficient petite cells measured by using tetrazolium overlay. Means ± SEM are shown. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. HG: 2% glucose; LG: 0.1% glucose plus 3% glycerol. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant, P > 0.05. Scale bars, 5 μm.
AMPK activation prevents the accumulation of ALS-associated FUSP525L in mitochondria of RPE-1 cells and alleviates FUS-induced cytotoxicity.
(A, B) Representative images (A) and flow cytometry quantification (B) of FUSP525L spGFP and GST spGFP in mitochondria of RPE-1 cells treated with or without AICAR. Shown in (B): Means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. (C, D) Fraction of TMRM-negative cells (C) and normalized cell viability (D) of RPE-1 cells expressing GST-HA-GFP11 or FUSP525L-HA-GFP11 with or without AICAR treatment. Means ± SEM are shown. (E)Working model wherein Snf1/AMPK balances the metabolic and proteostatic function of mitochondria in response to glucose availability. Paired two-tailed t-test for the same cell line treated with drug or control medium. Unpaired two-tailed t-test between cell lines expressing GST and FUSP525L. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns, not significant, P > 0.05. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Schematics of MAGIC pathway and spGFP-based imaging in the whole-genome screen in yeast.
(A) Schematic diagram of MAGIC involving the import of cytosolic misfolded proteins through mitochondrial import machineries and the subsequent degradation under proteotoxic stresses (heat shock or overload of MPs). (B) Schematic diagram of spGFP reporter. (C) Hsp104 spGFP in mitochondria at 30 °C and after heat shock (HS) at 42°C for 30 min. Endogenous Hsp104 was tagged with GFP11, while GFP1-10 was constitutively targeted to the mitochondrial matrix by linking to matrix protein Grx5. Similar results were obtained by using MTS-mCherry-GFP1-10 (7). 3 biological repeats, 63 cells (30 °C) and 220 cells (HS) imaged. Scale bar, 5 μm. (D) Flow cytometry readouts of yeast knockout mutants at 30 °C and after 42 °C HS. Red dots indicate mutants that failed to show an increase in Lsg1 spGFP after HS.
Snf1 regulates the accumulation of misfolded proteins in mitochondria after acute overexpression of FlucSM.
(A) Representative super-resolution imaging for FlucSM spGFP signal in mitochondria after 90 min estradiol induction. Top, maximum projection. Bottom, 3D rendering. OM: outer membrane labeled by Tom70-mCherry. (B, C) Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of time-dependent accumulation of FlucSM spGFP signal in mitochondria at 30 °C after estradiol or ethanol treatment in HG medium. Shown in (B): Top, FlucSM spGFP; Middle: mitochondria labeled with Tom70- mCherry; Bottom: merged images. Shown in (C): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Paired two- tailed t-test comparing 0 min and 90 min estradiol treatment. (D, E) Representative images (D) and quantification (E) of FlucWT, FlucSM, and FlucDM spGFP after 90 min estradiol treatment in HG medium. Shown in (E): means ± SEM of normalized spGFP intensity . Unpaired two- tailed t-test between FlucWT and FlucDM. (F, G) Representative images (F) and quantification (G) of FlucSM spGFP in cells that grew in HG, LG, and LG-Gly media. Shown in (G): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Paired two-tailed t-test. (H, I) Representative images (H) and quantification (I) of the nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation of Mig1-GFP. Shown in (I): means ± SEM of normalized Mig-GFP nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio. Paired (WT in HG vs. LG or LG-Gly) or unpaired (WT vs. Δreg1 in HG) two-tailed t-test, and one-way ANOVA for comparing Δreg1 in HG, WT in LG, and LG-Gly). (J) Immunoblots of FlucSM-HA-GFP11 and Grx5-HA-GFP1-10 in cell lysates of Snf1-inactive and Snf1-active cells. Relative FlucSM levels (FlucSM/Pgk1) and relative Grx5 levels (matured Grx5/Pgk1) of three biological repeats are shown. Paired (HG vs. LG or LG-Gly) or unpaired (WT vs. Δreg1 in HG) two-tailed t-test. Asterisk indicates the precursor species of Grx5-HA-GFP1-10 that are excluded from quantification. HG: 2% glucose; LG: 0.1% glucose plus 3% glycerol; LG-Gly: 0.1% glucose. EtOH: ethanol. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant, P > 0.05. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Reduced accumulation of misfolded proteins in mitochondria in Snf1-active cells is neither caused by elevated autophagy nor mediated by certain transcription factors.
(A, B) Representative images (A) and quantification (B) of FlucSM spGFP in control cells and autophagy-deficient mutants in LG medium. Shown in (A): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test between control and each mutant. (C, D) Representative images (C) and quantification (D) of FlucSM spGFP in wild-type (MIG1 MIG2), Δmig1, Δmig2, and Δmig1Δmig2 (ΔΔ) cells in HG medium. Shown in (D): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test between WT and each mutant. (E, F) Representative images (E) and quantification (F) of FlucSM spGFP in Δreg1 and double mutant cells in HG medium. Shown in (F): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test between Δreg1 and each double mutant. ns, not significant, P > 0.05. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Role of Tom70 cytosolic domain and Tom6 in regulating misfolded protein import.
(A) Working model of preprotein import and misfolded protein import through limited TOM channels. Introducing cytosolic binders of preproteins may release the import capacity for misfolded proteins. (B, C) Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of FlucSM spGFP in cells with or without Tom70cd overexpression in HG medium. Shown in (C): means ± SEM of normalized spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. (D) Representative images of FlucSM spGFP in cells overexpressing truncated Tom70cd variants in LG medium. Quantification is shown in Figure 4C. (E) Immunoblots of overexpressed Tom70cd-3×Flag variants in lysates of cells that grew in LG medium. Anti-HA panel shows FlucSM-HA-GFP11 after 90min estradiol treatment and constitutively expressed Grx5-HA-GFP1-10. Arrowheads indicate intact Tom70cd-3×Flag variants. (F, G) Representative images (F) and quantification (G) of FlucSM spGFP in WT and Δtom6 cells in LG medium. Shown in (G): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns, not significant, P > 0.05. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Snf1 activation protects against stress associated with FlucSM overexpression and prevents the accumulation of α-synuclein and FUSP525L in yeast mitochondria.
(A, B) Growth curves of wild-type control cells (A) and cells overexpressing Tom70cd (B) with (Estradiol) or without (EtOH) FlucSM expression in HG and LG medium. Fitted growth rates are shown in Figure 4A. (C) Relative growth rates of control cells and cells overexpressing Tom70cd variants. Means ± SEM are shown. Unpaired two-tailed t-test between control and Tom70cd variants that grew in the same medium (HG or LG). (D, E) Growth curves (D) and growth rates (E) of BY4741 cells lack of FlucSM spGFP reporter in HG and LG medium. Means ± SEM are shown. Paired two-tailed t-test. (F, G) Representative super- resolution imaging for FUSP525L spGFP signal in mitochondria after 100 min of estradiol induction. Shown in (F): maximum projection image. Shown in (G): 3D rendered image. Mitochondrial OM: Mitochondrial outer membrane labeled with Tom70-mCherry. (H-K) Representative images (H, J) and quantification (I, K) of α-synuclein (αSyn) spGFP signal FUSP525L spGFP signal in wild-type (REG1) and Δreg1 cells. Shown in (I, K): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. HG: 2% glucose; LG: 0.1% glucose plus 3% glycerol. EtOH: ethanol. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns, not significant, P > 0.05. Scale bars, 5 μm.
